Group items matching

in title, tags, annotations or url

Status of UCF (2nd largest univ in the US) blended learning and online learning systemic approach for quality to assure improvement - faculty development is required; social-constructivist paradigm and faculty engaged in action research; measure "student success" via grades earned A,B,C and blended does better with web-based or video-based; withdrawal and satisfaction rates nearly the same as f2f tho video has slightly higher; online learning benefits for students = convenience, reduced logistical demands, increased flexibility, information fluency; for faculty = professional devt, flexibility, teaching/research support; UCF expanded capacity, ability to serve students anywhere, buffers competition; online learning costs a little more but provides capacity equivalent to >$64M of classroom construction (which would have an annual operating cost of $4.1M = cost avoidance model), more efficient use of existing CR space, growth with quality

flipped his machine learning class in Spring 2012 using online lectures from the F2011 Stanford MOOC (an inclass "wrapper" around a MOOC - online discussion and grading with additional requirements from the onsite instructor, e.g., add'l readings, small group discussions, final project) "I now view MOOCs, and the assessment and discussion infrastructure that comes with them, as invaluable resources that I embrace and to which I add value. I, and I am guessing many others, are short steps away from full-blown customizations of individual courses and even entire curricula, drawing upon resources from around the world and contributing back to those resources."

See Peter Norvig's EE380 talk at Stanford on November 14th. "Online Education: One Year Later"

Video recording of Sebastian Thrun's (Google, Udacity) keynote at this week's 18th Annual Sloan Consortium Conference on Online Learning

Mr Shirky lets it all hang out. Good read.

Napster lost the battle but won the war - changing the story and disrupting the cost models; in higher ed our MP3 is the MOOC and our Napster is Udacity...

Napster did lose. What won was DRM-laden iTunes, then Amazon. What lesson will higher education draw from that?

Technology in Education can be used to facilitate instruction and realise many long-standing and sound goals around personalised learning, and clear learning outcomes, on campus and in online education.

"It's a long process of aculturation that transitions students into the adult world." I agree with this 100% and was glad to read it. While I support online learning, this reason alone makes me believe that if the college campus was taken away, we would be doing those young students a disservice.

definitions, economics, platforms, assessments, pedagogies still morphing; his perspective as a Fellow at Korea National Open University (and Open U) warns about all the previous efforts that "were ignominiously shuttered"

a wise and wonderful essay - especially important for those scholars who might buckle under the bullying and harassment so common in academia but more frightening when open and in the public domain. MOOCs should encourage public scholarship - and help to make it more valued... and of higher quality - but they will need to include in the design that the facilitators modeling advocacy and constructive kinds of alliances for the participants. That is, providing that "institutional commitment" for public scholarship that is thoughtful and intriguing (vs. public showboating).