CCReflect

This prospectus for a network of learning hubs was composed c. 2000. What followed from it?--this invites inquiry.

a set of the key things any person needs to learn: How to predict consequences How to read [effectively] (how to see under the surface to what each piece is doing; and to distinguish the 4 types: description, argument, explanation, definition) How to distinguish truth from fiction How to empathize How to be creative How to communicate clearly [i.e. how to write effectively; how to use the 4 types] How to learn How to stay healthy How to value yourself How to live meaningfully

"minimalistic feedback tool"

"One of our core values is "peer learning." It's kind of a wonky term, but we've grown to love it. Generally we use it as a shorthand for the following framework for learning: Everyone has expertise. We learn by connecting and sharing what we know. We give helpful feedback to each other to improve."

""The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world's problem.""

If form tends to follow function in design, what would the equivalent be in critical thinking? Are there forms of argumentation (assumptions, evidence, reasoning) that constrain the function (in contrast to the desired function dictating the form)? This line of inquiry led me to this reference.

What does this say about online learning platforms and courses? (Do they ever come with red, yellow and green lights that administrators see when they sign contracts for $$millions without knowing the educational effects of the online systems?) Note other skeptical views expressed in the comments section.

"Thrun seems to have 'discovered' that open-access, distance-education students struggle to complete," wrote Martin Weller, a professor of educational technology at the Open University, in Britain. "I don't want to sound churlish here, but hey, the OU has known this for 40 years."