Skip to main content

Home/ CCK 12/ Group items tagged papers

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Diethild Starkmeth

paper007-fullpaper.pdf (application/pdf Object) - 1 views

  •  
    This is an article about the technology to create openness in learning networks.
ce_bclark

External material: eLearnSpace - 10 views

Hi all, I found the folloiwng paper on-line: Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm

Siemens Connectivism 'Learning Theory'

started by ce_bclark on 23 Jan 12 no follow-up yet
anonymous

Lurking is Learning (Part 1 of 2) - 6 views

  •  
    Hi Brainy. Good post on lurking. I "lurk" when I listen to radio, download podcasts, watch TV, and read the newspaper. Works for me. A live session where "presence" and group dynamics is central to the activity is a bit different (if the name of everyone "in the room" is displayed, lurkers are visible to others, even if they say nothing). In live MOOC sessions, most people lurk most of the time. That doesn't mean they are not engaged, they may simply feel that sitting at the back of the room suits them better. Mark McGuire
  • ...1 more comment...
  •  
    Thanks, Mark. I do believe that lurkers are often well-engaged in their own chosen ways. Could be observation from 'the back of the room'. Could be that they are taking notes or drawing or mindmapping (with good old pen and paper or some electronic means). They could be tweeting about it the live session instead of chatting within the backchannel. I hope more lurkers come forward and let us know what they're up to in order to help dispel some myths. :)
  •  
    Hello Brainy Smurf, Guess I've been lurking in #cck12, but I don't see it as much different from face-to-face classrom behaviour. Not everyone comments no matter what the forum--eliciting participation is part of the "dark art" of facilitation, no?
  •  
    Hi, Sandra, thanks for weighing in. I agree that lurking online is essentially the same as a classroom, it just might not be as obvious since the online facilitator (if there is one) can't see body language or eye contact. The more I play around in moocs (currently in my 3rd, 4th and 5th at the moment), the more the idea of eliciting participation (or 'engaging' participants) is starting to make me cringe. I'm becoming more confident that learning doesn't need to invite engagement as explicitly as we think it does. Participants will decide how much/little to interact for a million different reasons on any given day (e.g., fatigue, boredom, illness, distraction, reflection, synthesizing, doodling) and I think we should let them own those choices.
Joanne Kaattari

Purdue OWL: APA Formatting and Style Guide - 2 views

  •  
    As I slog through APA formatting, I found their guidance on how to source wkis very interesting: "Please note that the APA Style Guide to Electronic References warns writers that wikis (like Wikipedia, for example) are collaborative projects that cannot guarantee the verifiability or expertise of their entries." - It sounds like Purdue doesn't overly value connected knowledge!
  •  
    Thanks for sharing Joanne - I have used the purdue owl quite a few times over the years but have never had to reference a wiki. Our of interest I think I'll take a look at the APA style guide tomorrow and see if they are similarly sceptical...
  •  
    Thank you for posting Joanne, you beat me to the punch. I use this site often for paper writing and was wondering why it wasnt posted sooner.
Diethild Starkmeth

The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts... - 0 views

  •  
    "Scaffolding, according to this author, "fades out" over time and enables the learner to perform a skill or task autonomously. Distributed intelligence, on the other hand, is a support system that emerges from a network of people, artifacts, and situations to support learners at any given moment."
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page