At the Digital Pedagogy Lab Institutes where we’ve taught, there’s one exercise in particular we return to again and again. In our “crap detection” exercise (named for Rheingold’s use of the term), participants use a rubric to assess one of a number of digital tools. The tools are pitted, head to head, in a sort of edtech celebrity deathmatch. Participants compare Blackboard and Canvas, for instance, or WordPress and Medium, Twitter and Facebook, Genius and Hypothes.is.
We start by seeing what the tools say they do and comparing that to what they actually do. But the work asks educators to do more than simply look at the platform’s own web site, which more often than not says only the very best things (and sometimes directly misleading things) about the company and its tool. We encourage participants to do research — to find forums, articles, and blog posts written about the platform, to read the tool’s terms of service, and even to tweet questions directly to the company’s CEO.
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url
1More
Research: The Proof is In! Multi-Tasking in Class Reduces Test Scores -- Campus Technology - 1 views
1More
16 OER Sites Every Educator Should Know -- Campus Technology - 1 views
A Learning Science Alternative to Bloom's Taxonomy | Learning Solutions Magazine - 1 views
The Digital in the Humanities: An Interview with Marisa Parham - Los Angeles Review of ... - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
41 - 60 of 78
Next ›
Showing 20▼ items per page