Group items tagged

Scammed BP Holdings What to do so you don't get taken by common work at home job scams: Internet ScamBusters #62 Today we'll focus on Part 2 of our series on home-based business scams and work-at-home scams. If you missed Part 1 in last month's issue on the Top 10 scams of this type 10 Tips on Avoiding Work At Home and Home Based Business Scams 1. Never, NEVER pay for the chance to work! This is the cardinal rule. You should treat working at home just like you would treat working for an employer at their place of business. If you were going for a job interview in the 'real world,' how would you react if the interviewer asked you to pay $50 or $100 to land the job, for starter materials, or for a 'good faith' payment to make sure you were serious about the business? You'd think it was absurd. No legitimate company charges employees a fee for a job. Whenever you're asked to pay for the chance at a job, or information about work-from-home jobs, you know it's a scam. Home-based businesses, on the other hand, may require start-up costs to cover investments, materials, franchises, or other items. As we state in the next step, check things out before you pay anything. 2. Check out the business before you pay anything. Have you heard of the business that's soliciting your money? If not, check them out carefully. Make sure they have a physical address and a phone number. Call to see if it's a real phone number. Do a search on http://www.Google.com to see if you can find any positive or negative comments. Check references carefully. Some warning signs of scammer companies: - They use free Web hosting services (such as Tripod or Geocities). - They use free Web email services (such as Yahoo! Mail or Hotmail). - They use Post Office boxes for mailings and don't disclose their real addresses. - They won't give you a telephone number where you can contact them. 3. Use your credit card to make purchases. This sounds counter-intuitive, but if you are going to

bp madrid holdings anti-fraud news articles Problems regarding tax frauds continue to dwell and even worsens. Efforts are now fully focused on the issue of prioritizing VAT fraud. The debate on VAT fraud has been divided into 2 main areas: 1. Conventional measures to reinforce existing VAT system. 2. More far reaching measures to modify the system, namely: o An option for Member States to introduce a general reverse charge system; o Taxation of Intra-Community transactions The Commission created a new expert group with Member States, the "Anti Tax Fraud Strategy (ATFS)" expert group, with a view to conduct the technical discussions on the conventional measures. The Vat system is not enough to combat a VAT fraud within a single market. There is need to improve a greater system in order to have a harmony and increase in cooperation between the state and the people. The commission proposes to improve measures to strengthen the existing system. Insinuations of tax evasion and target incompetence for income measurement are significant. Systematic misinterpretations of income source present misleading view of income distribution and redistribution profiles. Proposals have been submitted to fight fraud. More far reaching methods such as legislative proposals were released February 2008. In this Communication the Commission analyses the taxation of Intra-Community transactions and the introduction of the option of a general reverse charge system. November 2007, the commission presented a Communication with key elements concerned the conventional measures like the need of tax administrations for accurate information, the integration of an EU approach into the management of the VAT system and the importance of updated information on the VAT status of persons. The programs work by providing global approach to give measures for some action plans: to prevent potential fraudsters, an online confirmation was made available to traders for the vali

BP HOLDINGS MADRID SPAIN WIKIA What to do so you don't get taken by common work at home job scams: Internet ScamBusters #62 Today we'll focus on Part 2 of our series on home-based business scams and work-at-home scams. If you missed Part 1 in last month's issue on the Top 10 scams of this type 10 Tips on Avoiding Work At Home and Home Based Business Scams 1. Never, NEVER pay for the chance to work!' This is the cardinal rule. You should treat working at home just like you would treat working for an employer at their place of business. If you were going for a job interview in the 'real world,' how would you react if the interviewer asked you to pay $50 or $100 to land the job, for starter materials, or for a 'good faith' payment to make sure you were serious about the business? You'd think it was absurd. No legitimate company charges employees a fee for a job. Whenever you're asked to pay for the chance at a job, or information about work-from-home jobs, you know it's a scam. Home-based businesses, on the other hand, may require start-up costs to cover investments, materials, franchises, or other items. As we state in the next step, check things out before you pay anything. 2. Check out the business before you pay anything.' Have you heard of the business that's soliciting your money? If not, check them out carefully. Make sure they have a physical address and a phone number. Call to see if it's a real phone number. Do a search on http://www.Google.com to see if you can find any positive or negative comments. Check references carefully. Some warning signs of scammer companies: They use free Web hosting services (such as Tripod or Geocities). They use free Web email services (such as Yahoo! Mail or Hotmail). They use Post Office boxes for mailings and don't disclose their real addresses. They won't give you a telephone number where you can contact them. 3. Use your credit card to make purchases.' This sounds counter-intuitive, but if you are going to buy a

http://zackandrew25.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/work-at-home-jobs-how-to-avoid-getting-scammed-bp-holdings-madrid-spain-wikia/ bp holdings madrid spain wikia What to do so you don't get taken by common work at home job scams: Internet ScamBusters #62 Today we'll focus on Part 2 of our series on home-based business scams and work-at-home scams. If you missed Part 1 in last month's issue on the Top 10 scams of this type 10 Tips on Avoiding Work At Home and Home Based Business Scams 1. Never, NEVER pay for the chance to work!' This is the cardinal rule. You should treat working at home just like you would treat working for an employer at their place of business. If you were going for a job interview in the 'real world,' how would you react if the interviewer asked you to pay $50 or $100 to land the job, for starter materials, or for a 'good faith' payment to make sure you were serious about the business? You'd think it was absurd. No legitimate company charges employees a fee for a job. Whenever you're asked to pay for the chance at a job, or information about work-from-home jobs, you know it's a scam. Home-based businesses, on the other hand, may require start-up costs to cover investments, materials, franchises, or other items. As we state in the next step, check things out before you pay anything. 2. Check out the business before you pay anything.' Have you heard of the business that's soliciting your money? If not, check them out carefully. Make sure they have a physical address and a phone number. Call to see if it's a real phone number. Do a search on http://www.Google.com to see if you can find any positive or negative comments. Check references carefully. Some warning signs of scammer companies: They use free Web hosting services (such as Tripod or Geocities). They use free Web email services (such as Yahoo! Mail or Hotmail). They use Post Office boxes for mailings and don't disclose their real addresses. They won'

Swiss bank UBS's German subsidiary is under investigation by local prosecutors for purportedly abetting tax fraud. Bank employers allegedly helped investors to hide money pass revenue departments' authorities by transferring it to Switzerland, says Peter Lintz. Reported the investigation on November 8, 2012, Stuttgarter Nachrichten said illegal fund transfers reached well into 2012, money was being moved invisibly via an internal clearing account at UBS's German branch into Switzerland. Source not specified by the paper. Electronic data and other hundreds of thousands materials that were confiscated in UBS's Frankfurt offices that were raided in May are currently being analyzed by Mannheim prosecutors. The legal inquiries were intended for unknown representatives of UBS's German division. Some of the bank's customers are also among targets, added Lintz. As a result Swiss banks have been subject to investigations into tax evasion in the United States and Europe, throwing Swiss banking secrecy, enshrined in the republic's laws and traditions, into jeopardy. Bank refuses to comment about the issue rather late Wednesday of the same year they emailed a statement trough a spokeswoman stating that the bank is already "cooperating with authorities" but denies to comment on ongoing legal procedures. A number of French offices of UBS were searched as part of a probe into alleged aiding of tax evasion earlier this year. In some other issues involving UBS, they deny media reports telling wealthy Germans to move funds to Singapore and other money centers ahead of a Swiss tax deal due to come into force in January. Since 2009, UBS has closely examined "framework conditions" for business with over 60 countries including Germany and taken steps to adjust or improve the rules wherever necessary, the spokeswoman said.

bp spain holdings, barcelona madrid news Jos olet yksi niistä ihmisistä, jotka ovat sekoittaa huolimattomuudesta ja veropetosten ero et ole yksin, monet ovat näiden kahden levy. Laiminlyönnistä ole asianmukaista huolellisuutta välttää aiheuttaa vahinkoja tai menetyksiä toiselle henkilölle. Mutta huolimattomuudesta vie aikaa osoittaa. on velvollisuus huolehtia huolenpitovelvollisuus olosuhteet toiminnan tai toimimattomuuden olosuhteissa vastaaja ei täyttänyt tavanomaista hoitoa, joka järkevä ihminen pitäisi olosuhteissa (rikkominen) Kantaja on kärsinyt vammoista tai menetyksistä järkevä ihminen olosuhteissa kohtuudella odottaa ennakoivan (vahinko) vahinko johtui rikotaan tulli (syy) Nyt mikä on tulovero petoksia, veropetosten ilmenee, kun yksittäiset, liiketoiminnan tai yrityksen omistajat tarkoituksella tuottaa tietoa niiden veroilmoitukset verovelat määrän rajoittamiseksi. Veropetos on pohjimmiltaan liittyy vääristelemänsä tai salaamansa tiedot veroilmoituksen joudu maksamaan koko vero velvoite. Noudattamatta lakisääteinen väärentäminen tai tiedottamatta jättäminen on vastoin lakia. Väittäen vääriä vähennykset, väittäen henkilökohtaisista kuluista kuin liiketoiminnan kuluja ja ole raportointi tulot ovat esimerkkejä veropetoksia. Onko huolimattomuudesta tai veron petos? Veroprosentti on erittäin monimutkainen aihe, jota monet meistä ei voi helposti ymmärtää. Maallikon aikavälillä huolimattomuus on vain rehellinen virhe. IRS voi yleensä erottaa, jos virhe johtuu huolimattomuudesta tai tahallisesta verolainsäädännön kiertäminen. Veropetosten syntyy, jos: bp spain holdings, barcelona madrid news Liioittelua vapautukset ja vähennykset Asiakirjojen väärentäminen Salaaminen tulojen siirtoa Pitämällä kaksi kirjaa Käyttämällä väärennettyjä henkilötunnuksen Väittäen poikkeus jota ei ole riippuvainen Tahallaan pienemmiksi tuloja Eivät maksa veroja, jotka Taha

It's good that they have made something like these.

http://pimbpholdings.blogspot.com/2013/05/bp-spain-holdings-madrid-articles.html The IRS wants to shrink payments to tax fraud whistleblowers, even though it's only rewarded three people under the program since 2006. FORTUNE -- Hoping to win millions of dollars from the Internal Revenue Service for exposing tax fraud? It's going to get even tougher -- and some powerful people in Washington are not amused. In January, Sen. Charles Grassley, the 79-year-old Iowa Republican, chastised acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller over his recent proposal to restrict the agency's whistleblower program, already an object of criticism since its creation in 2006. The proposed curbs, Grassley wrote in a letter to Miller, showed one thing: that the IRS and its boss, the Treasury Department, "view whistleblowers with hostility." What exactly is at issue? The current whistleblower rules say a tipster can collect a reward of 15%-30% of proceeds brought in as a direct result of a tip. The dirt has to involve tax evasion of at least $2 million or tax fraud by an individual making at least $200,000 a year. Miller's proposed restrictions will likely shrink payouts. Among the curbs: making it nearly impossible for whistleblowers to share in rewards stemming from a company's inflation of losses, and excluding from rewards any money brought in from so-called Fbar fines. These draconian fines, levied on offshore tax evaders, are often dozens and even hundreds of times the amount of actual back-tax an evader must pay. Related post: http://archive.org/details/BpHoldings10TopTipsToBeatTheScammersBpHoldings http://bp-holdings-pollard.wikia.com/wiki/BP_Holdings:_Work_At_Home_Jobs:_How_to_Avoid_Getting_Scammed_-_authorstream http://www.wattpad.com/9270075-bp-holdings-donerer-800-000-topix-bp-holdings#.UZ6qIaL-GQo http://open.salon.com/blog/catherinehalli/2012/11/22/bp_holdings_arbeid_hjemme_jobber_hvordan_unng_bli_lur

http://jazonmert.wordpress.com/2013/05/24/the-irs-wants-to-shrink-payments-to-tax-fraud-whistleblowers-bp-spain-holdings-madrid-articles/ FORTUNE -- Hoping to win millions of dollars from the Internal Revenue Service for exposing tax fraud? It's going to get even tougher -- and some powerful people in Washington are not amused. In January, Sen. Charles Grassley, the 79-year-old Iowa Republican, chastised acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller over his recent proposal to restrict the agency's whistleblower program, already an object of criticism since its creation in 2006. The proposed curbs, Grassley wrote in a letter to Miller, showed one thing: that the IRS and its boss, the Treasury Department, "view whistleblowers with hostility." What exactly is at issue? The current whistleblower rules say a tipster can collect a reward of 15%-30% of proceeds brought in as a direct result of a tip. The dirt has to involve tax evasion of at least $2 million or tax fraud by an individual making at least $200,000 a year. Miller's proposed restrictions will likely shrink payouts. Among the curbs: making it nearly impossible for whistleblowers to share in rewards stemming from a company's inflation of losses, and excluding from rewards any money brought in from so-called Fbar fines. These draconian fines, levied on offshore tax evaders, are often dozens and even hundreds of times the amount of actual back-tax an evader must pay. MORE: 3 things Jamie Dimon might have meant when he said he was 'richer than you' But here's the rub in this unusual political fight: Even in its current structure, very few whistleblower claims get paid, thanks to bureaucratic foot-dragging at the IRS, according to lawyers representing whistleblowers. Despite receiving more than 1,960 claims since 2006, the IRS made its first payment only in 2011. In total, it has paid only three claims. The biggest: $104 million to convicted felon Bradley Birkenfeld, the former UBS AG private banker who kick-started the

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jul/07/bp-oil-deepwater-horizon-disaster-compensation Le Deepwater Horizon huile catastrophe avaient certains incontesté terrible, conséquences : 11 personnes sont mortes lors de l'explosion de la plate-forme pétrolière de BP le 20 avril 2010, et l'huile verse pas cochée dans le golfe du Mexique depuis 86 jours. Après cela, cependant, l'image devient trouble. Des centaines de milliers de personnes et d'entreprises ont été touchées par la catastrophe, mais, comme tous les mois passe, 10 000 prestataires plus émergent. Demain, avocats pour BP comparaîtra à la Nouvelle Orléans pour soutenir que son énorme projet de loi d'indemnisation est en décalage avec les faits et attaqués par les fraudeurs. BP va tenter une fois de plus faire valoir que les termes du contrat de l'an dernier pour indemniser les victimes du déversement sont maltraités par les « réclamations frauduleuses, excessives ou inadéquate ». Le géant pétrolier n'est pas seul en craignant que son système d'indemnisation est maltraitée. La semaine dernière, le juge Carl Barbier, qui supervise l'affaire de plusieurs milliards de dollars de dommages civils contre BP, nommé Louis Freeh, un ancien juge et le chef du FBI, pour examiner les allégations d'inconduite à l'office qui gère les demandes d'indemnisation. Watch this presentation: http://www.slideshare.net/gcharm/bp-jordbruksfretag-artikel-kod-85258080768-ch-oil Jusqu'à présent, la compagnie a eu peu de chance argumentant contre le régime qu'il mis en place en mars dernier. Un panel de trois juges entendra l'appel de demain, dans laquelle chaque côté a 20 minutes pour exposer son cas. BP fait valoir que le Comité de rémunération est ignorant la signification juridique acceptée des termes tels que "recettes" et de "rémunération" de la manière qu'il évalue des demandes. BP est représenté par Theodore Olsen, l'avocat de Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher qui était procur