Skip to main content

Home/ beyondwebct/ Group items tagged ed

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Barbara Lindsey

Stanford's open courses raise questions about true value of elite education | Inside Hi... - 0 views

  •  
    fall 2012 syllabus
Barbara Lindsey

A proposed Ph.D. in German at Colorado aims to halve time to degree | Inside Higher Ed - 0 views

  •  
    could be model for other ph.d. programs in humanities
Barbara Lindsey

TED-Ed - Lessons Worth Sharing - 0 views

  •  
    fall 2012 syllabus
Barbara Lindsey

UNC-Greensboro may offer its first fully online degree -- in philosophy | Inside Higher Ed - 0 views

  •  
    fall 2012 syllabus
Barbara Lindsey

3 Ways to Hack Your Class with Google+ | Inside Higher Ed - 0 views

  •  
    fall 2012 syllabus
Barbara Lindsey

Saylor Foundation's Free Courses Offer Path to Credit | Inside Higher Ed - 0 views

  •  
    fall 2012 syllabus
Barbara Lindsey

Christine Capota, Ed. M. - 0 views

  •  
    An example of a modern CV/Resume profile
Barbara Lindsey

Stop Chasing High-Tech Cheaters | Inside Higher Ed - 0 views

  • It has long been academe's dirty little secret that bad instructors and bad assignments create cheating.
  • "In today's information age, where a body of information in all but the narrowest of fields is beyond anyone's ability to master, why aren't colleges teaching students how to research, organize and evaluate the information that is out there?"
  • If, however, processing information is the issue, if creative solutions are being sought, if students are being asked to develop new syntheses, then cheating will be much rarer, and much more difficult, technology use will become essential, and learning will be far more relevant.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • So schools do not teach effective use of Google, of text-messaging, of instant-messaging. They don't teach collaboration. They barely teach communication outside the stilted prose only academics use. No wonder students are prepared for nothing except more school.
  • There is also the issue of educational discrimination. When schools fight against technology, they are fighting access to education for people who learn and function differently. Technology, from computers to calculators to classroom cellphones, enables a wide variety of students who would otherwise be left out to participate and succeed. Technology in the hands of all students allows disabilities and functional deficits to be invisibly accommodated so that knowledge can be developed, nurtured, and evaluated on terms fair to everyone.So, no, the problem is not cheating. The problem is firmly one of instructional and evaluation technique. It will not be solved until teachers and professors figure out that understanding and the ability to work with knowledge is what counts, and that anything you can instantly Google, or store in your calculator, or retrieve via quick text-message or phone call need not be remembered, nor tested, because, obviously, you will always be able to instantly Google it, or store it in your cellphone, or get someone to text it to you. 
Barbara Lindsey

Calhoun School: Steve's Blog Is it Learning or Training? - 0 views

  • proponents claim, the methods “work,” as represented by higher test scores.   Because, they add, the methods are efficient, meaning you can produce results with brutal economic efficiency and large classes.  And, in ed policy-speak, the systematized, highly structured methodologies are “scaleable,” easily replicated and exported to other schools. 
  • Anyone intensely “drilled” in facts or simple algorithms will demonstrate superior performance when tested on short-term retention.   The students in programs like that at Williamsburg Collegiate are being trained to give the “right” answers, but they are learning little or nothing.   Other evidence exposes the folly of these practices, as test score gains among younger students are not holding as the same students move into older grades. But the policy response in most places is reflexive, not reflective.   Drill them more and test ‘em again! 
  • Perhaps the greatest tragedy of this approach to education is that it disregards, often punishes, the qualities that most characterize real learning.  Children are discouraged from expressing a point of view – no time for that and it isn’t on the test.  Creativity is irrelevant.  Children who are sensitive and poetic are devalued, forced into quick, aggressive responses by a drill sergeant teacher.   Critical thinking is not welcome.  Where is the space for empathy and imagination?  What about the child whose unique intelligence is the ability to visualize something beautiful, to see another possible way to solve a problem, to turn a history assignment into a song?
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Most highly regimented urban charter schools are largely for the “other” –the underclass children of color whom powerful people talk about but seldom meet.    I wonder if Mssrs. Gates, Broad, Dell, Walton or Bloomberg would subject their own children to such a school environment, where they would march in tight formation and eagerly parrot the “right” answers required by the training manual?    I would guess not.  Of course I didn’t see many of those guys at Fort Benning either.         
  • There is little evidence outside of the short term, self-fulfilling cycle of call and response, that these schools are educating students at all
Barbara Lindsey

National Education Technology Plan 2010 | U.S. Department of Education - 0 views

  •  
    US DOE National EdTech Plan
« First ‹ Previous 41 - 60 of 102 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page