Skip to main content

Home/ Government Diigo/ Group items tagged threat

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
qanderson136

North Korea warns of Very grave situation after Biden called it a security threat - 11 views

www.nbcnews.com/...after-biden-called-it-n1266072

shared by qanderson136 on 03 May 21 - No Cached
  • qanderson136 on 03 May 21
     
    Thoughts?
  • ...8 more comments...
  • joeypo10 on 03 May 21
     
    Personally i feel like this is a step backwards in our relations with North Korea. In Trumps presidency we created peace with North Korea rather than accusing them of a world threat and raising tensions.
  • noahsandbothe on 03 May 21
     
    I think we need to be careful but North Korea is a terrible place and has a terrible leader who murders his own citizens. We can't be friends with them while their leader is going against American ideals and committing atrocities in his own country.
  • tsilva588 on 03 May 21
     
    I believe that North Korea is a threat but not one to the United States. He claimed before that we were within reach of his destruction but that wasn't the case. Kim called Biden ¨a rabid dog¨ so this seems to just be him showing that he doesn't like Biden and would prefer Trump.
  • aburianek421 on 03 May 21
     
    I think Kim Jong Un certainly has bad intentions, and he certainly is a threat. However, he's making empty threats because not only is the US military far stronger than North Korea's, but also because if North Korea launched an attack on any country, many other countries would immediately come to their aid and fight against N. Korea
  • ericschmidtberge on 04 May 21
     
    Yes, I think that we did take a step back from where we were with North Kora but honestly, I don´t see them as that much of a threat. I think that America´s army and tec is so ahead of North Kora that we're much more of a threat to them than they are to us. I think that most likely Kim Jong Un will continue to make threats like this but will never act on them. Hopefully, at some point, North Kora will be able to overcome being controlled by a dictator and can be treated fairly.
  • rosellyrosas on 05 May 21
     
    North Korea is such a terrible place to even live with. We shouldn't try to "mess" with them and cause a bigger problem. This could cause us so much danger. Not only because the President has bad intentions, but also because they have more and bigger weapons than us.
  • jdogan on 05 May 21
     
    North Korea is a failing nation and really the only reason it doesn't fall as it is is because of china not wanting the influx of refuges fleeing there. When North Korea does all this show of it being a threat it's really not that much of a threat to the US because of the far greater military potential of the US. With Military bases around the world there's not really any way to wage an effective war against the US since they can strike anywhere, and countries know this and they know they couldn't win a war with the US so they will never try and ultimately North Korea will fall in on itself over time anyway.
  • thomaschau on 10 May 21
     
    I wouldn't really call North Korea a major threat but that doesn't mean we shouldn't keep an eye on them though. The Government has threatened the United States with an all-out war or a nuclear attack, but with no actual outcome. North Korea is a country that is bark with no bite. Our military arsenal is far superior in every way possible and for any country like North Korea were to attack us it would be their entire government brought down to rubbles. Saddam Hussein found out the hard way in Iraq.
  • mgerman776 on 24 May 21
     
    North Korea has always been an issue and I think they should keep an eye on them. We've almost always had issues with them it's hard to imagine being allies with them like that.
  • jcontreras201 on 25 May 21
     
    North Korea has always been a threat to the U.S. because of how unpredictable they can be. We have literally always had problems with them.
Bryan Pregon

Classes Resume After "Hit List" Threat Closes Schools - 4 views

www.wowt.com/...-Closes-Schools-249722811.html

shared by Bryan Pregon on 12 Mar 14 - No Cached
john cannon liked it
  • Bryan Pregon on 12 Mar 14
     
    "Burwell, Nebraska Public Schools after they were canceled so administrators could prepare new security measures in the wake of a threat mailed to City Hall."
  • ...9 more comments...
  • Hailey Hallagan on 12 Mar 14
     
    I think that they should of shut school down for a while. They put a bunch of peoples lives in danger. Even if they checked their bags and what not, that doesn't mean they aren't considered dangerous.
  • Abbey Tierney on 12 Mar 14
     
    i Think that they should shut the school down until they take all the security measures possible to make sure something doesn't happen again
  • Kelly Hickey on 12 Mar 14
     
    It stinks that things like this keep happening. Why do people keep making serious threats to hurt other people at schools? What do they gain from that?
  • rjackson654 on 12 Mar 14
     
    They should have shut down the school for awhile. It should be taken with more precaution they should have taken even just a day or two to decide if what they are doing is enough to keep people safe.
  • rpeters048 on 12 Mar 14
     
    I feel like they have done everything right in this situation, there isn't a whole lot more they can do to help the cause. Closing school a little longer I feel wouldn't have a huge effect on the situation, yet it could help the students clear their mind and stuff.
  • Autumn Bettcher on 12 Mar 14
     
    Safety measures should be taken and those who were addressed in the "hit list" should have extra protection seeing as they are targets of this threat.
  • Bryan Pregon on 13 Mar 14
     
    I agree with many comments here. It would seem that there must have been enough credible evidence to think that the person making the threat might act on it. Even though I posted the article, I think we can sometimes get over excited when hearing these sorts of stories... the fact is, schools are among the SAFEST places for us to be. There has been school violence (even locally), but those situations are thankfully very rare!
  • Melanie Mathiesen on 13 Mar 14
     
    It makes sense that the school is taking the measures needed to make the school a safer environment. No one should have to go to their job or their classes scared of being killed.
  • Lauren Colpitts on 14 Mar 14
     
    School should have been closed for awhile until it was safe for everyone. They need to make sure that no one is in any sort of danger. The school should go through all the things wrong and find ways to fix it all.
  • Bethany Churchill on 14 Mar 14
     
    I agree that it is important for threats to be prevented, and I think what they are doing to prevent them may just be what is needed to be done.
  • Este Smiley on 14 Mar 14
     
    I think the steps they are taking are the right way to handle the situation. Everyone should be considered a suspect, you never know who could be behind the threats. The administrators and students safety should be their top priority.
nwailes919

Bomb threat targets 'Making a Murderer' sheriff - 7 views

www.usatoday.com/...79803648

shared by nwailes919 on 04 Feb 16 - No Cached
  • nwailes919 on 04 Feb 16
     
    MANITOWOC, Wis. - Authorities investigated a bomb threat made Wednesday night against the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Office and evacuated buildings near the downtown office. The sheriff's office has recently received significant criticism from members of the public for its handling of the investigation of the investigation of the 2005 slaying of photographer Teresa Halbach.
  • gpearson033 on 16 Feb 16
     
    I think that the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Office should be prepared for the threats from people, because this documentary did take a rather big impact on peoples lives, and probably affected them in many ways. Releasing the documentary is something that should be taken really seriously, and cautiously.
Melissa Diaz-Aguilera

After threats against U.S., North Korea turns ire to South - 0 views

www.cnn.com/...index.html

Government Politics News cnn threats N.Korea

shared by Melissa Diaz-Aguilera on 25 Jan 13 - No Cached
  • Melissa Diaz-Aguilera on 25 Jan 13
     
    Seoul, South Korea (CNN) -- In its latest bout of hostile rhetoric, North Korea on Friday warned of the possibility of "strong physical counter-measures" against South Korea in relation to tougher sanctions imposed this week by the United Nations.
  • patrick boian on 31 Jan 13
     
    as long as they test their weapons by not firing them at their or anyone elses people they should not be sanctioned
  • Bryan Pregon on 31 Jan 13
problero

Is Donald Trump A Threat To Democracy? - 2 views

www.npr.org/...ld-trump-a-threat-to-democracy

shared by problero on 12 Dec 16 - No Cached
  • problero on 12 Dec 16
     
    Even before he's sworn in, Donald Trump is putting his own stamp on the role of chief executive. That has some people rejoicing - and others worried about where he's going to take the country. Here's why some of Trump's critics say the president-elect could be a threat to democratic institutions and why others say those fears are overblown.
danielaespinoza

U.S. threatens peace in South China Sea, Beijing says - CNNPolitics.com - 4 views

www.cnn.com/...index.html

shared by danielaespinoza on 26 May 15 - No Cached
  • danielaespinoza on 26 May 15
     
    The message was delivered after the U.S. military on Wednesday undertook a reconnaissance flight on which a CNN crew flew. "The recent surveillance activity by a U.S. plane posed potential threats to China's islands and reefs, making it highly possible to lead to misjudgment, which could cause maritime or air accidents," said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei, according to a report on state-run CNTV.
  • britthutch12 on 26 May 15
     
    A message was delivered on Wednesday after the US military undertook a flight on which a CNN crew flew on. The Chinese said that surveillance activity by U.S posed potential threats to China's islands, as well as threats/
trocha340

Los Angeles Schools Closed Threat - CNN.com - 0 views

www.cnn.com/...index.html

shared by trocha340 on 15 Dec 15 - No Cached
  • trocha340 on 15 Dec 15
     
    Classes have been canceled for the Los Angeles Unified School District due to an unspecified threat i think that it was right for them to shut down the schools and inspect to see if there was anything wrong for for the wellness of the students
Bryan Pregon

Texas files suit in federal court over Syrian refugees - CNNPolitics.com - 29 views

www.cnn.com/...index.html

shared by Bryan Pregon on 03 Dec 15 - No Cached
agilbert921 liked it
  • Bryan Pregon on 03 Dec 15
     
    "Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a complaint in federal court against the United States, State Department and the International Rescue Committee, seeking a stay of federal plans to settle any Syrian refugees in his state."
  • ...12 more comments...
  • agilbert921 on 04 Dec 15
     
    Texas should let more refuges into their state because its not their decision, its the american goverenments
  • baddison758 on 04 Dec 15
     
    I think we should help these refuges because we have procedures in our immigration process that, if done correctly, we will be protected against the very few ISIS terrorists that hide withing those refuges. Also it is a stand against ISIS if we continue letting them in because we will show that we are not afraid of them and fear is all terrorists have against the world.
  • ncasson324 on 04 Dec 15
     
    I think since Texas wasn't informed that the refugees were coming, they have a reason to be mad. Suing may be a little extreme, but it is a huge worry if they are threats to the safety of the Texas people, especially since it was confirmed they cannot do accurate background checks on them
  • lcarman980 on 04 Dec 15
     
    I think that the US should be doing what we can to help but I don't think anymore refugees should be allowed into the country. We should not be held accountable for taking care of them. If our nation will be put in danger by possible terrorists posing as refugees, we shouldn't allow anymore. A lot of the refugees that have already come to America have been complaining because we aren't giving them more things. We gave them food, shelter and protection but they complain about not being given TVs. Why should they get free things if half of our nations populous is under poverty line and expected to fend for themselves? I completely understand that they need help but we should not have to put our country in harms way to do it. There is no way to know if they are terrorists or refugees so we shouldn't take the risk.
  • haveltherock on 04 Dec 15
     
    We should let them in but only with very high monitoring to track out the terrorists hiding in the crowds. It might be a evil way to do it but we will be able to stop the terrorists dead in their tracks without just ignoring their please for help. (ZAC OLSON)
  • chowe892 on 04 Dec 15
     
    Texas should let them in but they should take certain steps to make sure that they are not terrorists. It isnt their choice to keep them out its the governments.
  • masoncutting on 04 Dec 15
     
    The American Government should let the state make their own decision. If the state doesn't want to help, then let it be.
  • molson922 on 04 Dec 15
     
    I really don't know what I think the government should do at this point. I'm pretty neutral on the subject, because I fear for our safety while I also fear for the refugees. I do strongly believe though that these refugees do need a place to go where they can be safe, but it's hard to know whose good or bad.
  • trocha340 on 04 Dec 15
     
    i wouldnt the refugees in because you dont know which ones are a threat i believe it would be to much of a risk
  • jwondercheck947 on 04 Dec 15
     
    I think that the way things are now, with the US not being able to individually make the decision whether or not refugees are allowed into a specific state, is the best for us right now because having one decision for the whole country is more organized and orderly than having every state with a different policy on refugees. Personally, I feel for the Syrian refugees because most of them are women and children. But at the same time, with the risk of letting terrorists in, it is a tough decision. If we did thorough background checks on every single person that came into the US from Syria then maybe I would think this would be okay. Because I don't think it's fair to stop women and children from living a good life here because there MAY be a terrorist among them.
  • rwilson761 on 04 Dec 15
     
    I believe that we shouldn't let just anyone in maybe do a background check before they enter our country just in case something is likely to happen, Not being stereotypical but with all the things that ISIS has done so far they could possibly plan something if we were to not accept any Syrians at all because we're "afraid".
  • garrettross420 on 04 Dec 15
     
    They do and they dont know whats all going down but they should let them in because its choice of the government to let the refuges in
  • tbonaparte on 04 Dec 15
     
    I think that we should take refugees in because they're trying to get out of that environment and the U.S could be a lot of help to them, but I also think we should keep our eyes opened because we don't know who is a threat and who isn't. It's a tough decision to be honest.
  • natehathaway on 04 Dec 15
     
    I think that it's up to the government and not the individual states to decide whether to let the immigrants in or not
Bryan Pregon

'Dictatorships often start in the face of a threat': UN privacy chief warns against lon... - 0 views

www.independent.co.uk/...-nations-privacy-a9438561.html

shared by Bryan Pregon on 01 Apr 20 - No Cached
  • Bryan Pregon on 01 Apr 20
     
    "'Dictatorships often start in the face of a threat': UN privacy chief warns against long-lasting theft of freedoms amid coronavirus surveillance"
Breanna Schmitt

Russia claims it can wipe out US Navy with single 'electronic bomb' - 15 views

www.foxnews.com/...th-single-electronic-bomb.html

shared by Breanna Schmitt on 19 Apr 17 - No Cached
  • Breanna Schmitt on 19 Apr 17
     
    Russia has claimed it can disable the entire US Navy in one fell swoop using powerful electronic signal jamming. A news report from the country - where the media is essentially controlled by the state - said the technology could render planes, ships and missiles useless.
  • ...7 more comments...
  • dmoritz558 on 24 Apr 17
     
    Russia is threatening the US with statements saying that they could destroy our navy and air force by jamming all of the signals. In my opinion Trump should take action to make sure that they don't do that because then America would be vulnerable. I'm not saying that we should attack but we should focus on defense right now.
  • lmakram on 09 May 17
     
    If so, why don't the Russians do it? And now that Russia apparently claimed what they can do, can America compete with this and maybe use the same technology on the Russians?
  • taylor_m on 09 May 17
     
    How credible is this information? If it is credible what is the Government doing about the threat?
  • daniel hetrick on 09 May 17
     
    Because Russia says they are capable of doing this. There is a possiblity of them expressing it over dramatically. If you look at the technology comparison, the United states is much farther ahead. You don't think we can do the same back at them? We probably can. Just get an EMP.
  • isaaclidgett on 09 May 17
     
    You cant jam an M16 with an electric bomb.
  • Bryan Pregon on 09 May 17
     
    I was also reading from a few different sources that an ex-Russian official has suggested that Russia military has the ability to use underwater nukes to detonate a "tsunami bomb" off our coasts. This claim has been officially denied by the Putin govt, but interesting to consider weapons like this. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/01/russia-can-launch-tsunami-against-us-nuclear-bombs-buried-ocean/
  • caileyhartenhoff on 09 May 17
     
    I'm not quite sure why we're so worried about alleged claims created by Russia. Not only that but the U.S. military as well as U.S. technology like Daniel said is much more advanced. If we really want to know if these allegations are true find out. Otherwise you stay living in fear over whether something is true or not. Take their threat and do something about it if it's a threat that's that high in severity.
  • Jorden Crinklaw on 09 May 17
     
    I wonder if Donald Trump has done anything about this, or is planning to. Russia threatening us with this is very serious and I have a feeling Trump is not doing much. Could Russia really disable all planes and missiles through an electronic signal?
  • amcclary122 on 09 May 17
     
    Is the government going to do anything about this issue? Or should the people have to worry about a near future war ahead?
Bryan Pregon

Your Right to Own, Under Threat | Electronic Frontier Foundation - 1 views

www.eff.org/...your-right-own-under-threat

shared by Bryan Pregon on 29 Oct 12 - No Cached
  • Bryan Pregon on 29 Oct 12
     
    The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments today in a case called Kirtsaeng v. Wiley, and their final decision could help shape the future of "first sale," a legal doctrine that underpins the right to sell, lend, or give away the things you buy, even if those things contain copyrighted elements.
  • Jeremy Vogel on 29 Oct 12
     
    I actually read another article about this somewhere (wish I had saved it now.) In the article I read a law professor or a lawyer or someone like that said that it isn't things manufactured overseas but things originally bought overseas. The example used in the article I read was if you bought an iPod in China because it was cheaper then tried to sell it here for a profit then the "first sale" doctrine doesn't protect you. However, if you buy the iPod here in the United States, even if it was made in China, then you'd be protected. Not sure how accurate/unbiased the article I read was as I don't remember who it was by but I do think that this article sounds a little biased and like they are trying to push two sperate issues together ("first sale" and the controversial digital licences issue). Just my take though.
Bryan Pregon

A Saudi woman tweeted a photo of herself without a hijab. Police have arrested her. - T... - 19 views

www.washingtonpost.com/...b-police-have-now-arrested-her

shared by Bryan Pregon on 14 Dec 16 - No Cached
  • Bryan Pregon on 14 Dec 16
     
    "Late last month, she tweeted a photo of her outfit, and the post circulated through Saudi Arabia, drawing death threats and demands to imprison or even execute the woman. On Monday, police in the country's capital of Riyadh said they had arrested the woman"
  • ...19 more comments...
  • Landon Mohr on 15 Dec 16
     
    I know it is their culture to where a hijab but the woman should get freedom. They shouldn't be forced to wear the hijab all the time in public. It's a disgrace towards women. What she did was her belief and I think other women in Saudi Arabia don't want to wear their hijab all the time but they are too afraid of what will happen to them. Now that she has done it maybe other women will follow in her footsteps.
  • kelsi836 on 04 Jan 17
     
    I understand that wearing the hijab is important to this religion and this country, but isn't it going a little far by arresting her? What they are trying to prove is that the country has a power of fear over it's citizens, mostly it's women citizens. This shows the importance of how religion and state should be separate because if it was, she wouldn't have gotten arrested.
  • emma spidle on 04 Jan 17
     
    I agree with Landon now that she took off her hijab maybe other women will follow in her footsteps
  • lmcdowell956 on 04 Jan 17
     
    I agree with Landon because, the woman shouldn't have to wear something they don't want to wear all the time.
  • lauren rambo on 18 Jan 17
     
    Nobody should be told what to believe or how to dress. This woman was simply expressing herself but was arrested for moral disagreements.
  • nate kliegl on 18 Jan 17
     
    Landon got it right by saying she should get the freedom to wear whatever. And no woman or man should be disgraced by what they wear
  • brettday on 18 Jan 17
     
    I agree with Lauren on that people should have the freedom to dress how they want
  • kplowman702 on 18 Jan 17
     
    I agree with Lauren. The women should express herself in anyway she wants.
  • jakecolburn on 18 Jan 17
     
    This seems nuts. Like a spoof of middle eastern living on youtube. Does not seem real that a lady would be threatened with death and imprisoned for wearing a dress and coat. this is very different from my reality. I obviously think she should wear what she wants, it think the real issue is understanding that there is a large number of people that do not feel the same way.
  • Bradley Daugherty on 18 Jan 17
     
    She should have the freedom to dress how she wants and maybe others will follow her by dressing how they want.
  • hmiller403 on 18 Jan 17
     
    I think she is brave to stand up for what she believes in, many women there are too scared to throw out the head scarfs and put on something that they feel nice in. I think she should be let free and allowed to wear whatever. There is no legal dress code there it's just considered taboo which is wrong.
  • jwelch096 on 18 Jan 17
     
    I agree with Landon because this woman is now facing death all because she wanted to make a statement for women.
  • Matthew E on 18 Jan 17
     
    Unfortunately for the Arabic culture this is illegal and is shamed. With our culture this would be welcomed because people are allowed to show their skin, but with them its shamed and its not going to change.
  • jwells549 on 18 Jan 17
     
    I think it is unfair, sexist, and probably uncomfortable for the women. (Besides the constant torture, rape, imprisonment, etc etc that happens in saudi) they are being punished for wanting to be equal and expressing themselves.
  • kim bagshaw on 18 Jan 17
     
    I think that the woman is trying to promote change however she did not do it in the right way. Her actions were wrong because if its just her doing it than it won't have as much of an impact as it would if 20 or more did it. However if she really wanted to not wear them than can she just move to a different place so she can. I will admit arresting her is silly and doesn't solve anything, it could promote not wearing them by arresting her if you think about it.
  • mckenzie spanjer on 18 Jan 17
     
    I agree with Kim that she's trying to promote change, but I also understand that there are morals that the country believes women should follow. Instead of just her breaking the moral she should have gotten other women to join so there would have been more of an impact and something could have changed.
  • ebouvier878 on 18 Jan 17
     
    I think that even though it does not seem right, that is what the country believes and she knew that something was going to happen.
  • Alex Thacker on 18 Jan 17
     
    I think it's her freedom to dress how she wants and she shouldn't be forced to wear the hijab
  • ogomez1025 on 18 Jan 17
     
    I think that people have the right and free from what they want to wear only that it is not inappropriate to offend people depending also if they are in a place such as black people or other people of different ideologies and have some message discriminating That is a different way but for the rest, there is always freedom of expression and of being able to dress as one always wants and when one does not in a bad way.
  • bayleefox1 on 18 Jan 17
     
    I know it is their culture but the woman should get freedom, shouldn't be forced to wear the hijab all the time in public. It's a disgrace, you should be able to do/wear what you please.
  • amonge914 on 18 Jan 17
     
    It is so crazy how around the world women are held to higher or even lower expectations when it comes to, education, clothing, physically beauty and intelligence. How is it even possible to imagine a world where the clothes you wear lands you into jail? There is justice that needs to be served her to have an innocent women in jail. There has to be something that is done for the world when it comes to woman suffrage. The hard part isn't going through with a plan to do that, the hardest part is finding a plan-- to do just that.
amonge914

European Union president trashes Trump as 'threat' - 0 views

www.cnn.com/...european-union-trump

shared by amonge914 on 07 Feb 17 - No Cached
  • amonge914 on 07 Feb 17
     
    European Union President Donald Tusk's diplomatic bombshell listed the Trump administration as a threat alongside China, Russia, terrorism and radical Islam, adding that "worrying declarations by the new American administration all make our future highly unpredictable."
kroark782

U.S., Russia discussing high-tech aid to counter Olympic terror threat - 0 views

security.blogs.cnn.com/...-counter-olympic-terror-threat

Government Politics news cnn

shared by kroark782 on 23 Jan 14 - No Cached
  • kroark782 on 23 Jan 14
     
    By Barbara Starr Top U.S. and Russian military officials on Tuesday discussed the potential for the United States to share high-tech equipment to counter any use of improvised explosives by terrorists during the Sochi Olympics, a U.S. official told CNN. Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey and his Russian counterpart, Gen.
  • Daniel Bonner on 23 Jan 14
     
    I like this idea considering that there are so many people going to the olympics, Safety first.
  • jsteenbock23 on 30 Jan 14
     
    This is a good solution if they are able to find a way to make it work. The Olympics are gonna be interesting this year with everyone on high alert.
jasminemarie16

Miriam Carey was the girl in the car at the Capitol shooting. - 1 views

www.cnn.com/...index.html

shared by jasminemarie16 on 04 Oct 13 - No Cached
  • Bryan Pregon on 04 Oct 13
     
    OK I want YOUR opinions on this issue... Was it appropriate for the capital city police shoot her once her car had crashed? She had no weapon, but were they acting to protect public safety? What is your view?
  • ...6 more comments...
  • Mikaela Bowen on 07 Oct 13
     
    In my opinion, they shouldn't of shot her. I'm almost sure that the reason they had chosen to take this action is because they feared that she was trying to attack the white house. It's likely that if the thought that she might be targeting the government wasn't an assumption that had been made, she wouldn't of been shot. That represents inequality in our society, because had it been anyone else that seemed like a target, this person wouldn't of lost her life. Her car was already crashed, and no weapons were in her possession. Knowing that, how could she of been a threat to the public in any way?
  • Rachel Cottone-Dungan on 07 Oct 13
     
    She tried to run her car into the white house. She knew what she was doing. She knew she would end up in jail or in trouble at least. If your going to do something stupid, and try to endanger several people's lives over something you can't control, then whatever happens, happens.
  • Sara Borgaila on 07 Oct 13
     
    I think she was using her vehicle as a weapon but I don't think that means that they needed to shoot her. I think she was crazy for having her kid in the car with her and they should have arrested her to then be able to question her for her actions now they'll never know.
  • Victoria Kirk on 07 Oct 13
     
    They shouldn't have shot her. They probably did it to avoid more paper work and hassle. Always looking for a reason to kill people who defy the government. Plus she wasn't the only one in the car. Talk about devastating.
  • tyler nielsen on 07 Oct 13
     
    It was okay that she was shoot. Because what if she had a bomb. And she was a threat to national security that is why she was shoot
  • sarah smith on 07 Oct 13
     
    I think they shouldn't have shot her.Especially since her one year old daughter was in the vehicle and probably witnessed the horror of her mom being shot and killed in front of her.
  • amber1996 on 07 Oct 13
     
    No it wasn't right to do that. Yes they were trying they could of shot somewhere else on her that wouldn't of killed her but just got her to stop what she was doing.
  • Sara Dunn on 08 Oct 13
     
    They should have shot her in the arm or leg just to stop her but to kill her in front of her kid is wrong. But she was also wrong for bringing her child with and putting her in a dangerous situation.
oelliff884

YouTube "Let's Player" Placed into Custody for Bomb Threat - 0 views

YouTuber Kootra was 'swatted' on camera when someone sent in an anonymous phone call to police about a bomb threat. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/28/kootra-swatting-swat-team-livestream_n...

Government Swat YouTube

started by oelliff884 on 04 Sep 14 no follow-up yet
Bryan Pregon

Transcript: President Obama's address to the nation on the San Bernardino terror attack... - 27 views

www.cnn.com/...index.html

shared by Bryan Pregon on 07 Dec 15 - No Cached
  • Bryan Pregon on 07 Dec 15
     
    "Transcript: President Obama's address to the nation on the San Bernardino terror attack and the war on ISIS"
  • ...7 more comments...
  • tbonaparte on 07 Dec 15
     
    I feel like Obama is actually trying to help us because America has done a lot of snooping and getting in other's business these past few years. The bombs in different cities are a huge problem and he's trying to resolve it, but not in war. America is trying to make peace with everyone, but we really can't when there's so much fighting and hate in the world.
  • rwilson761 on 07 Dec 15
     
    I agree with what president Obama said, I think that since the attack its finally opening his eyes and realizing that were in danger to snd they need to take action and do something about it.
  • baddison758 on 07 Dec 15
     
    I think that Obama is taking very good steps in the fight against ISIS by showing the international community that we are willing to help and that we need the help of other countries to be able to defeat a force that affects everyone. I think he is doing the right thing with our defense against ISIS getting agents in our country with focusing the fight online and in our immigration process.
  • haveltherock on 08 Dec 15
     
    I agree that Obama should at least act on the threat because of the attack. Its bring violence to his doors that he needs to act upon before its to late that terrorists are running up and down our streets. ( ZAC OLSON )
  • molson922 on 08 Dec 15
     
    I think that Obama is doing a good job to comfort the concerns of the U.S., and I also think why so many people think the government is doing nothing is because they have to keep some of it secret for our own safety and so ISIS does'nt known our plan.
  • trocha340 on 08 Dec 15
     
    i think obama should act on the threat
  • ross_fisher on 08 Dec 15
     
    I believe President Obama has the right idea in taking on terrorists this way because he's not just having us as one country going after ISIS. He's having us as a group of countries go after this group that continues to terrorize for no other reason than for public awareness and publicity on their organization. He also has a good view about the "gun control" with automatic rifles, he is just saying that it's better to make sure that no one who isn't a professional can't use the weapon.
  • nwailes919 on 17 Dec 15
     
    In my opinion Obama should take action the way he plans to. How long before these plans come into action?
  • garrettross420 on 17 Dec 15
     
    doing whats best for it whatever it takes and come out
molson922

Israel's lessons for protecting Americans (Opinion) - CNN.com - 0 views

www.cnn.com/...index.html

shared by molson922 on 07 Jan 16 - No Cached
  • molson922 on 07 Jan 16
     
    After all, the most significant U.S. response to the threats facing the West post-9/11 was regime change in Iraq and Afghanistan, an approach that cost thousands of American lives and a trillion dollars, but which has failed to eliminate the threat to American citizens while leaving the Middle East in an even bigger mess than it was.
Bryan Pregon

Twitter wants to crack down on 'dehumanizing language' - 6 views

money.cnn.com/...index.html

shared by Bryan Pregon on 02 Oct 18 - No Cached
  • Bryan Pregon on 02 Oct 18
     
    "The "hateful conduct" policy prohibits users from making direct attacks or threats against people on the basis of considerations like race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or gender, for example, but it doesn't necessarily also encompass tweets that dehumanize users in different ways."
  • leviathan02 on 23 Oct 18
     
    How will twitter actually be successful in cracking down on 100% of the dehumanizing language without stepping on some free speech toes?
1 - 20 of 52 Next › Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page