A team of gamers needed just ten days to produce an answer to an enzyme riddle that had eluded experts for more than a decade.
Impulse Januar 2010 (WebTV, NZZ Online) - 2 views
Maxed out: Testing humans to destruction - 1 views
CultureLab: Is God a mathematician? - 2 views
The app that can read your mind: iPhone brainwave detector was only a matter of time | ... - 2 views
Prof. Markrams Hirnmaschine (Startseite, NZZ Online) - 2 views
-
A critical view on Prof. Markram's Blue Brain project (in German).
- ...4 more comments...
-
As far as I know it's sort of like "Let's construct an enormous dynamical system and see what happens"... i.e. a waste of taxpayer's money... Able to heal Alzheimer... Yeah... Actually I was on the conference the author is mentioning (FET 2011) and I have seen the presentations of all 6 flagship proposals. Following that I had a discussion with one of my colleagues about the existence of limits of the amount of bullshit politicians are willing to buy from scientists. Will there be a point at which politicians, despite their total ignorance, will realise that scientists simply don't deliver anything they promise? How long will we (scientists) be stuck in the viscous circle of have-to-promise-more-than-predecessors in order to get money? Will we face a situation when we'll be forced to revert to promises which are realistic? To be honest none of the 6 presentations convinced me of their scientific merit (apart from the one on graphene where I have absolutely no expertise to tell). Apparently a huge amount of money is about to be wasted.
-
It's not just "Let's construct an enormous dynamical system and see what happens", it's worse! Also the simulation of the cosmological evolution is/was a little bit of this type, still the results are very interesting and useful. Why? Neither the whole cosmos nor the human brain at the level of single neurons can be modelled on a computer, that would last aeons on a "yet-to-be-invented-extra-super-computer". Thus one has to make assumptions and simplifications. In cosmology we have working theories of gravitation, thermodynamics, electrodynamics etc. at hand; starting from these theories we can make reasonable assumptions and (more or less) justified simplifications. The result is valuable since it provides insight into a complex system under given, explicit and understood assumptions. Nothing similar seems to exist in neuroscience. There is no theory of the human brain and apparently nobody has the slightest idea which simplifications can be made without harm. Of course, Mr. Markram remains completely unaffected of ''details'' like this. Finally, Marek, money is not wasted, we ''build networks of excellence'' and ''select the brightest of the brightest'' to make them study and work at our ''elite institutions'' :-). I lively remember the stage of one of these "bestofthebest" from Ivy League at the ACT...
Web Surfing Makes You Work Better - 4 views
Gamers solve puzzle which stumped scientists for years | Mail Online - 2 views
-
link to the paper: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2119 additional info at: http://fold.it/portal/
DailyTech - NASA Releases iPhone App - 2 views
-
The U.S. space agency has worked more diligently the past few years to better interact with the public.
-
what about ESA?
- ...3 more comments...
-
I said "more" because we already gave them money in the form of Sophia and Atlas :) If we want to be consistent in promoting "open" efforts (open innovation, open source, open governance, etc.) we should avoid Apple like the plague. They are far far worse than Microsoft in terms of closedness, secrecy, shady market practices and vendor lock-in. Just google a bit and you will find lots of example of their behaviour.
-
cant' really argue about the Apple practices, although I ve read some things. I think the NASA app is more like a news feed and nothing more. But that online crowdsourcing game we had in mind, now that would be cool in a mobile version - new mobiles also have accelerometers nowadays
Why three buses come at once, and how to avoid it - physics-math - 29 October 2009 - Ne... - 4 views
-
Now systems complexity researchers Carlos Gershenson and Luis Pineda of the National Autonomous University of Mexico have devised a mathematical model that shows how the problem might be prevented
Beyond GDP: We need a dashboard for the whole economy - opinion - 21 October 2009 - New... - 1 views
Found: first 'skylight' on the moon - space - 22 October 2009 - New Scientist - 2 views
-
A deep hole on the moon that could open into a vast underground tunnel has been found for the first time. The discovery strengthens evidence for subsurface, lava-carved channels that could shield future human colonists from space radiation and other hazards.
« First
‹ Previous
61 - 80 of 197
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page