Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle

Opinion: Google's wave drowns the bling in Microsoft's Bing - Software - iTnews Australia - 0 views

The browser battle renewed today
...

Cancel
Go offline and the wave data stayed with you
...

Cancel
much promise in connecting people to knowledge
...

Cancel
...16 more annotations...
the first round clearly goes to Wave
...

Cancel
collaborative technology that blurs the lines between email, wiki, SMS and Twitter
...

Cancel
Wave integrates many of the features of disparate systems in common use
...

Cancel
application programming interfaces would make it easier for third-parties to customise web applications
...

Cancel
Microsoft's Bing, launched under the NineMSN banner in Australia
...

Cancel
a shift from discrete applications to just one to handle all communications
- Graham Perrin on 29 May 09
  
  This is almost certainly too much for me to swallow.
  
  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">This is almost certainly too much for me to swallow.</div>
  
  ...
  
  Cancel
- Graham Perrin on 29 May 09
  
  I like discrete applications.
  
  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">I like discrete applications.</div>
  
  ...
  
  Cancel
...

Cancel
ultimately it would mean a user could save all their work in the browser and dump it on the intertubes when they go back online
...

Cancel
waves worked best on standards-compliant, Webkit browsers
...

Cancel
emails (which could be translated between languages in real time) to a wave user
...

Cancel
wave that was turned back into an e-mail
...

Cancel
The same held true for instant messages and tweets
...

Cancel
getting people to change their rusted-on habits
...

Cancel
Microsoft's hand may have been moved by the launch of Wolfram|Alpha
...

Cancel
Safari
...

Cancel
Mozilla
...

Cancel
Chrome
...

Cancel

IS 339 Presents Dot-to-Dot, a Global Learning Reception - 0 views

339dottodot.com

shared by Pat Wagner on 25 May 09 - Cached

Pat Wagner on 25 May 09

Dot-to-Dot will be hosted by IS 339 on June 9, 2009." /> This is a cached version of http://339dottodot.com. Diigo.com has no relation to the site.x 0

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Dot-to-Dot will be hosted by IS 339 on June 9, 2009." /> This is a cached version of <a href="http://339dottodot.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://339dottodot.com</a>. Diigo.com has no relation to the site.x 0</div>

...

Cancel

Collaborative Translation Twitter Database - 0 views

spreadsheets.google.com/viewform

shared by James OReilly on 28 Sep 08 - No Cached

Translation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

en.wikipedia.org/Translator

shared by James OReilly on 17 Sep 08 - Cached

James OReilly on 17 Sep 08

Machine translation

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Machine translation</div>

...

Cancel

Don't Invent Anything New - Groupthink 1.0 - Collaborative Translation - 0 views

collaborative-translation.ning.com/...show

shared by James OReilly on 04 Sep 08 - Cached

Does Google Have Rights to Everything You Send Through Chrome? - ReadWriteWeb - 0 views

www.readwriteweb.com/..._google_have_rights_to_all.php

chrome letters small veneno

shared by moritz jakobsen on 03 Sep 08 - Cached

"a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services."
...

Cancel
I was intrigued as to whether this would be passed onto something as massive as a browser - and was amazed when I was reading through the terms. Blake and James have interesting points above - however I believe these are overshadowed by the very top line - "These Terms of Service apply to the executable code version of Google Chrome. " This statement must be read in conjuction with the following statement - thereby expressly inferring that it applies to Chrome. My reading and understanding of these TOS, prima facie, implies that under Clause 11 - anything you enter into the browser 'which is a Google product/service' can be used by Google whenver they want - now or in the future. It's enough to never want to use this browser. Send an email through yahoo using chrome - Google Own it. Post a facebook message - Google own it. Send an idea about a new business through Chrome - Google own it. Yes these are exagerations - but they are not limitations under that clause. Until Google remove such errenous conditions - no a chance in hell I am using that browser.
...

Cancel