Skip to main content

Home/ Virtual R&D Teams/ Group items tagged Delicious

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Nader Ale Ebrahim

Free eLearning Tools - DevLearn Morning Buzz Session - 0 views

  •  
    "4946061042 4913d4f886 Z Free eLearning Tools - DevLearn Morning Buzz Session Posted Nov 5 2012 in DevLearn with 4 Comments During the Morning Buzz that I hosted on Thursday of this year's conference, myself and the participants brainstorm and shared many of the free tools that we use within our design and development process. Here is the listing of the tools that we complied as our favorite go to FREE resources. Images Microsoft Office Clipart, Photos, Animations psdGraphics stock.xchng Flickr Flickr Commons Servier Medical Art WikiMedia Commons Your own photos search for free - icons, backgrounds, clipart. Will result in many free CC to use items. Editing Tools/Screen Capture Gimp Popcorn Faststone Windows features Picasa PowerPoint Pixlr Paint Snagit ($) Screenr Jing Windows Movie Maker Audio Capture/Editing Sound Recorder (within Windows) Audicity Soundforge Captivate ($$$) YakiToMe Words to Time Calculator Collaborative Tools Sharepoint Anymeeting Google Docs Collate Box PBWorks Join.me Spring Pad Skype MS Send for Review Delicious.com Diigo Facetime Wikispaces Dropbox Evernote Livescribe ($) MS Lyncs ($) Pearltrees Voicethread Mindmeister (collaborative online tools - Robin Good) Wallwisher Pinterest Yahoo Groups Slide Sharing (or a great information resource) Prezi SlideShare Speaker Deck SlideRocket Other Favorites Zoho Pixie (color grabber) Smartsheet (project management) Trello (project management) Kuler (color schemer) MS Publisher($) Color Schemer Sizer Fodey.com (newspaper clipping generator) jRuler (virtual screen ruler) Wunderlist (task listing) Poll Everywhere (live polling) Surveymonkey (survey tool) Mailchimp (email champaign tool) Animoto (video clips)
Nader Ale Ebrahim

Virtual Team Leaders: Are You the Life of the Party? | Virtual Team Builder - Blog - 0 views

  •  
    "It shouldn't be difficult for you to imagine the last party you attended as we come out of the holiday season. Maybe you have a few standout memories of that special occasion: the food might have been delicious, the decorations, beautiful, and you might have found yourself immersed in the most interesting conversation ever with another guest. However, I'm willing to bet that those details would have meant very little without an outstanding host to tie everything together. We all know a great party host creates a safe and interesting environment for their guests and makes everyone's comfort level their top priority. Actually, when it comes down to it, an effective virtual leader possesses the very same qualities and demonstrates the same behaviours. When we really think about it, every great party host has a number of personal characteristics that enable them to be the centre of the party, providing everyone with energy, inspiration, and the ability to simply be themselves. He or she is interested in building a relationship with every guest; similarly, an effective virtual team leader builds relationships with the team members. A good party host will ask their guests questions; this is an indicator of politeness and also puts people at ease and makes them feel valued. Your host may ask "How was the drive over?" or "Have you seen any interesting movies lately?" Naturally, a virtual leader is also interested in putting their team members at ease and making them feel valued. In a virtual team situation, this involves keeping the lines of communication open; asking team members questions about the progress of their tasks or whether they need assistance. Open communication also means virtual leaders should reply to questions and issues that are raised by their team members in a timely and clear manner. An effective party host also has an unmistakable presence at their party; often, this involves achieving a balance between being overly involved with their
Nader Ale Ebrahim

Delicious - 0 views

shared by Nader Ale Ebrahim on 29 Sep 10 - Cached
Nader Ale Ebrahim

SSRN Author Page for Ale Ebrahim, Nader - 0 views

  • Nader Ale Ebrahim's Scholarly Papers
  • Nader Ale Ebrahim's Scholarly Papers
  • Nader Ale Ebrahim's Scholarly Papers
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Citation Frequency and Ethical Issue | Show Abstract Hide Abstract | Download | Electronic Physician, 6(2), 814-815. Accepted Paper Series Ale Ebrahim, Nader University of Malaya (UM) - Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering Posted: 2   Abstract: Dear Editor: I read your publication ethics issue on “bogus impact factors” with great interest (1). I would like to initiate a new trend in manipulating the citation counts. There are several ethical approaches to increase the number of citations for a published paper (2). However, it is apparent that some manipulation of the number of citations is occurring (3, 4). Self - citations, “those in which the authors cite their own works” account for a significant portion of all citations (5). With the advent of information technology, it is easy to identify unusual trends for citations in a paper or a journal. A web application to calculate the single publication h - index based on (6) is available online (7, 8). A tool developed by Francisco Couto (9) can measure authors’ citation impact by excluding the self - citations. Self - citation is ethical when it is a necessity. Nevertheless, there is a threshold for self - citations. Thomson Reuters’ resource, known as the Web of Science (WoS) and currently lists journal impact factors, considers self - citation to be acceptable up to a rate of 20%; anything over that is considered suspect (10). In some journals, even 5% is considered to be a high rate of self - citations. The ‘Journal Citation Report’ is a reliable source for checking the acceptable level of self - citation in any field of study. The Public Policy Group of the London School of Economics (LSE) published a handbook for “Maximizing the Impacts of Your Research” and described self - citation rates across different groups of disciplines, indicating that they vary up to 40% (11). Unfortunately, there is no significant penalty for the most frequent self - citers, and the effect of self - citation remains positive even for very high rates of self - citation (5). However, WoS has dropped some journals from its database because of untrue trends in the citations (4). The same policy also should be applied for the most frequent self - citers. The ethics of publications should be adhered to by those who wish to conduct research and publish their findings. Improve citation, Research impact, Publication ethics
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20 items per page