Group items tagged

or just to profit from it

potential customers

Plenty of research does indeed show that an individual student will learn more if you can tailor the curriculum to match her learning style, pace and interests; the tablet, he said, will help teachers do that

commercial opportunities

looking for higher test scores

exploit

It provides immediate feedback

The Amplify tablet helps make personalization possible.

The teacher’s tablet also has an app blocker and monitoring functions that can see and control what’s happening on student tablets

Companies with vested interests are pitching themselves as the solution to the country’s educational problems, he says, “but we don’t have research proving it’s true.”

apostles of disruption,

depend on good teaching

it can be easier to find money for cool new gadgets than for teachers.

must equip our students to compete with counterparts in India and China

Where technology makes a difference, it tends to do so in places with a strong organization dedicated to improving teaching and where students closely engage with teachers and one another.

for sale to schools

gaze tracking

Your future depends on it; my salary depends on it.

until I got to Central High, I literally didn't know I was a good student, because the question never came up.

There were tests, but they just gave information about what's going on. This is something we ought to be doing better.

"How can mosquitoes fly in the rain?" And then, but why is there a problem? Well, you study the force of the raindrop hitting a mosquito - it's like a person being hit by a locomotive.

It doesn't matter how much you learn in school; it's whether you learn how to go on and do things by yourself.

Control from above, control by the administrators. No respect for the working person, whether it's a teacher or machinist.

Kids are naturally creative, and of course, you don't have to beat it out of them. That's why they're asking, "Why?" all the time.

You can't let teachers control the classroom. That's teaching to test; then the teachers are disciplined. They do what you tell them. Their salaries depend on it; their jobs depend on it. They become sociopaths like everyone else. And you have a society where it's only, "Look after me; I'll forget everyone else."

Seeing more and more aspects of our lives as games to win through maximization has a sort of self-perpetuating effect with perverse consequences, not the least of which is the impairment of what Diesing terms social rationality; the cherishing of unique relationships, personal connectedness, cooperative functioning, solidarity and sentiment.

If winning efficiently is the goal, then the rules (ethical, moral, legal, and spiritual), are essentially obstacles to game.

In our schools, competition for access to elite preschools, for grades, for social status, in sports, over positions of leadership, and for admission to exclusive colleges transforms one of our most basic institutions for fostering community, ethics and learning into competitive, individualistic corporate training-grounds. In these settings, the importance of competitive sports becomes paramount, for both financial and training purposes, and the artistry of cheating (see this year's Stuyvesant High School cheating scandal) and rule-bending (see Joe Paterno) revered. Such intense competition encourages the professionalization of parenting -- through tutors, highly-educated nannies, prep courses, and professional training camps (such as investment camps). You can imagine the deleterious effects these trends have on the ethos of care and moral responsibility in our families and schools, a critical buffer against bullying and violence in the lives of our children.

We become hyper-connected through technologies, boasting our number of "friends" on Facebook, and have less and less intimacy.

We choose friends with benefits or Internet porn over romantic relationships as they are less messy, more efficient.

Life is a race and we are losing.