Skip to main content

Home/ 10th Grade Research Project 2010/ Group items tagged cosmetics

Rss Feed Group items tagged

golan elzur

Animal Testing on Cosmetics - About Animal Testing (UK) - 1 views

  • Animal testing on cosmetics is arguably one of the most - if not the most - controversial areas of animal testing. Although it was banned in the United Kingdom (UK) in 1998, it does still occur in other areas of the world. The European Union (EU), however, is poised for an almost full ban by 2009 on the sales of cosmetics tested by animals. Currently, the Netherlands and Belgium have banned the sales of such cosmetics, similar to the UK.
  • Cosmetics testing on animals relates to many aspects of the manufacturing process. Animal testing may occur on the full, finished product or it may occur on individual ingredients within a formulation. Another country may even be contracted to conduct the testing within the cosmetic company's homeland or it may be contracted out to a country where animal testing is not currently banned.
  • Cosmetics testing is usually focused on ensuring that a product does not harm a person's eyes and skin
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • While many companies are now citing 'no testing on animals' in terms of their ethical stance on cosmetics, it is clear that this is an excellent marketing strategy given the widespread public disapproval of the practice. Ironically, those companies who do not test cosmetics on animals are still benefiting from previous data that was conducted on animals.
golan elzur

The EU Ban on Animal Testing for Cosmetics - Animal Free Zone (UK) - 0 views

  • The ban was agreed upon in 2002, but goes into effect in 2009
  • After years of discussion and debate, language for the ban was completed by 1998. Initial passage of the ban occurred in 2002
  • During the process, it was learned that some companies planned to circumvent the ban by testing cosmetics on animals outside the border of the EU and then import them for sale.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • The cosmetics industry maintains that animal testing is the only way to be sure that ingredients in cosmetics and personal hygiene products will not c
  • ause cancer or aggravate allergies
  • France has consistently opposed the EU ban. Collectively, the cosmetics companies in France make it the largest animal tester in Europe. However, opinion polls indicate that 60 percent of French citizens oppose animal testing
golan elzur

Law Bans Cosmetics Tests on Animals - Almost | Features | PETA.org.uk - 0 views

  • The Bad Points The Cosmetics Directive has loopholes and exceptions which mean that some animal testing can still be performed, and ingredients which are tested on animals can still make their way into products on store shelves in the UK. These loopholes include the following: Certain kinds of animal tests will still be allowed until 2013. Animal tests could still be used for ingredients to ensure that they meet other requirements, such as the requirements of other laws (for example, to determine if the ingredients could cause damage to the environment) or laws abroad.
  • The Good Points The ban means that fewer cosmetics tests using animals will be performed in Europe and that non-EU companies hoping to export their products to Europe will have to change their ways too. What's really exciting about the ban is that its deadline has helped advance the development of humane testing methods, such as the cruelty-free skin-irritation test which PETA helped fund. These humane tests can also be used for some drugs and other chemicals – so everyone's a winner. In addition, the ban is an important step forward because it makes the point that animals shouldn't be used for trivial purposes.
golan elzur

Animal testing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

  • Cosmetics testing is banned in the Netherlands, Belgium, and the UK, and in 2002, after 13 years of discussion, the European Union (EU) agreed to phase in a near-total ban on the sale of animal-tested cosmetics throughout the EU from 2009, and to ban all cosmetics-related animal testing. France, which is home to the world's largest cosmetics company, L'Oreal, has protested the proposed ban by lodging a case at the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg, asking that the ban be quashed.
  • The research is conducted inside universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, farms, defense establishments, and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry
  • Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, animal research, and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals in experiments.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • medical schools
  • universities
  • pharmaceutical companies
golan elzur

Beauty brand tainted by US animal testing - Times Online - 0 views

  • div#related-article-links p a, div#related-article-links p a:visited { color:#06c; } COSMETICS on sale in high-street shops were tested on animals years after the practice was banned in the UK.
  • A ban on live animal testing of cosmetics was introduced in 1998 when the government withdrew licences for testing ingredients in make-up and other beauty products.
  • Three popular products, produced under the leading brand Olay, contain a cosmetic preservative, butylparaben, that was tested on animals
golan elzur

BBC News | Sci/Tech | End to cosmetic tests on animals - 0 views

  • The testing of cosmetics on animals in the UK has finally ended.
  • The end to the tests comes after months of negotiations to persuade companies to stop using animals - mainly guinea pigs, rats and mice - in the last remaining tests.
  • No fresh licences will be issued, meaning an effective ban, a Home Office spokesman said.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • But the change will only affect a tiny fraction of laboratory animals - less than 0.1% of the 2.7m animals used in testing in the UK each year.
golan elzur

Bunnies Don't Wear Lipstick: Death by Mascara: Why We Torture, I Mean, Test On, Bunnies... - 0 views

  • Mrs. Brown was to be honored by her local PTA that very evening. At the beauty parlor hours before the big event, she decided to go ahead and try a cosmetic change -- to permanently darken her brows and eyelashes. Her hairdresser had a new coal tar-based dye called "Lash Lure." Riding home, Mrs. Brown’s eyes started burning. According to Teresa Riordan, author of Inventing Beauty, Mrs. Brown made matters probably worse when she got home by applying various treatments herself, one boric acid, another a topical made by her pharmacist, and then “yellow oxide of mercury.’ At the PTA banquet that evening, Mrs. Brown was so uncomfortable she left early. In the ensuing days, the skin around Mrs. Brown’s eyes ulcered and blistered. Nothing really helped. Of the aftermath, The New Republic would write: “Her eyes are gone and the flesh around them is a mass of tortured scars.”1
Adya Saigal

Australia Introduces Body-Image Standards for Fashion Industry: Glossed Over - 0 views

  • Recommendations include disclosing and avoiding the digital enhancement of images; banning ultra-thin female models or overly muscular male ones, in addition to models under the age of 16 to advertise adult clothes; employing a greater diversity of ethnicities and model body sizes; eschewing editorial and advertising content that promotes negative body image through rapid weight loss and cosmetic surgery, and, for retailers, carrying a wider variety of clothing sizes that better reflects the demands of the community.
  • “ultra-thin female models or overly muscular male ones”
  • it should be that there is beauty in all sizes of bodies.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • “Fashion is for, generally speaking, women who are in good physical shape, who choose to take care of themselves.”
  • So larger sizes don’t sell as well as smaller sizes…but she doesn’t stock as much larger-sized merchandise.
1 - 10 of 10
Showing 20 items per page