Skip to main content

Home/ wcsgifted/ Group items tagged policy

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Suzanne Palmer

Westerville City Schools Office of Gifted Education - 5 views

www.westerville.k12.oh.us/administrativeDepartment.aspx

shared by Suzanne Palmer on 09 Feb 10 - Cached
  • Suzanne Palmer on 09 Feb 10
     
    After reviewing the Identification brochure (accessible on the right-hand side of this site) and ODE's "Who is Gifted in Ohio by Law and Rule?", what questions do you have about the gifted identification process in Ohio or Westerville? What do you see as the biggest challenge in the gifted identification process in Westerville?
  • ...6 more comments...
  • Laura Hance on 16 Feb 10
     
    So. . .do you know that if you are writing a comment about link, and click back on the link to look something up, when you return to our wcsgifted page, everything you have typed up to that point is gone ARGHHHH!!!!! Tip of the day: Always click Post before navigating away from this page!
  • Laura Hance on 16 Feb 10
     
    And I was just about finished with this assignment - kinda like the dog ate my homework! It appears as if the Westerville identification process follows the criteria outlined by the Ohio Department of Education. I would say that the broad range of gifted identification would be the greatest challenge. I also wonder about the 4 year age gap between the two grade levels when screening instruments are administered. The developmental differences between a student in Grade 2 and a student in Grade 6 are vast. I am aware that students can be identified by other means as well; however I would venture to believe that a majority of students are identified by these group screening tools. I am curious why students are not rescreened earlier than Grade 6?
  • Laura Hance on 16 Feb 10
     
    My final comment has to do with the technology piece of this course. I am still trying to differentiate between the advantages of using the Wiki and the advantages of using Diigo. I was thinking that Diigo was a tool to organize Online Resources and the Wiki was a forum for discussion and uploading other resources. If that is the case, would this assignment not be better off posted on the Wiki - perhaps creating a new page in the Ashland folder entitled "Identifying the Gifted - What are the Challenges?" where we could post comments and respond to each other? I'm struggling a little with the organization of the two sites and how they work together - any help/suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks:-) Hope everyone is enjoying our winter wonderland!
  • Suzanne Palmer on 17 Feb 10
     
    Thanks for sharing the interesting tidbit of information about posting. Sorry for the frustration. I guess I should address your final comment as this seems like the appropriate place to comment. It is my understanding that the Wiki is not suited to the discussion but the Diigo is. Eric, can you comment as well on this?
  • Suzanne Palmer on 17 Feb 10
     
    Laura, You raise some valid questions in the time between whole group testing. We started testing in 2nd grade because years ago our gifted programming did begin in 3rd grade so 2nd grade testing information was used for that purpose. About 6 years ago when we went through all of the cuts, we lost our 3rd grade programming but by that time we were a BFK district and needed that 2nd grade data point so whole group testing has remained there. Also, up until a few years ago, the next whole group testing opportunity did take place at 5th grade. When 5th grade began testing 4 areas for the OAT, it was my understanding that the decision was made to move it to 6th grade because of the overwhelming amount of testing at that grade level. 6th grade only had the reading amd math OATs. You raise the same question that many people ask. Another important factor to consider is that testing is expensive.I don't know if we will be able to get that changed or not. We are in compliance with the state and our identification. And you are correct that we do offer individual testing based on referrals but this is a small majority of our students who are identified in this way.
  • Eric Calvert on 22 Apr 10
     
    On the "Wiki vs. Diigo" question, my opinion is that Diigo has better features for facilitating discussions. (However, discussion is possible in the wiki as well to a certain extent using the "comment" feature at the bottom of most pages.) Diigo, though, lets you comment on specific sections of most web resources and can "thread" discussions, which the comment feature of PBWorks does not support. While Diigo and PBWorks do have some overlapping features, I mainly use PBWorks to collaboratively CREATE new content or share already-made resources that are not elsewhere online (e.g. policy documents, curriculum maps, or unit/lesson plans that would otherwise be locked in a physical file cabinet or on one teacher's local hard drive.) I mainly use Diigo to bookmark, annotate, and share resources that are already online. (For example, interesting online articles, lesson plans from online curriculum repositories etc.) Occasionally, though, I will use the two tools in tandem -- for example, creating a page using PBWorks which I then bookmark into Diigo. (Remember that the pages you make in the wiki are really web pages, so you can use Diigo's tools on top of them, and share and discuss them with anyone who also has access to the wiki.) For example, on other projects, my collaborators and I have started "draft" documents as wiki pages and then used Diigo to comment on the draft and suggest changes and additions.) Long story short, though, think of the wiki as a place to collaborative make new things, and think of Diigo as a place to store, share, find and talk about things that are already out on the web. Hope this helps clarify things a bit. If not, though, please let me know.
  • Laura Hance on 23 Apr 10
     
    Thanks for the clarification - this does help. So. . . when asked to view and comment on a Power Point or a PDF document. . . what is the best way to do this? I know these can these these be uploaded into the Wiki, but then are they actually part of the webpage or a separate entity. From what you are saying, if they are part of the webpage, we should be able to use the Diigo tools??? Just clarifying again. Thanks for taking the time to help me understand this better.
  • Eric Calvert on 23 Apr 10
     
    No problem -- glad to hear that made some sesne. Technically, when a web page links to a PowerPoint file, the file isn't really "part of" the webpage in the sense that the actual content of the PowerPoint presentation gets added to the HTML that makes up the webpage. The PowerPoint file is still a separate entity, but the link tells your web browser where on the Internet to find it. ("Uploading" a file to the wiki actually makes a copy of your original document on a remote web server, where it also gets assigned a unique web address. When you create a link to an uploaded file, then, you're not really embedding the actual file in the wiki page, but a quick-and-easy way to access that file.) Unfortunately, the only way to make comments within PowerPoint files (on a "slide by slide" basis) is to use the commenting features in the PowerPoint program itself, then re-save and re-upload your commented version, so this gets tedious pretty quickly if you're trying to have an ongoing online conversation.) It's a similar story with PDF files. It's really a matter of personal preference whether to comment on a PPT or PDF file you link to from a wiki page using diigo or the wiki itself. Personally, I'd probably opt to do it in Diigo just because I like its commenting features better than the ones in PBWorks and because doing it in Diigo would make it part of my Diigo library, which means I could quickly find it again in the future if I needed it without having to remember where it is. I'm in a bunch of different wikis that overlap topics, so sometimes if I read something that I want to find again in six months or a year I have trouble remembering if it was in Wiki A, Wiki B, or Wiki C. Therefore, having a central index like my Diigo library in helps keep me from losing stuff and saves me time searching for things I've read in the past and want to access again. Hope you have a good weekend.
Eric Calvert

NMSA - NAGC Position Statement: Meeting the Needs of High Ability Learners in the Middl... - 1 views

www.nagc.org/index.aspx

NAGC NMSA Position Statement policy middle school wcsgifted high ability

shared by Eric Calvert on 21 Oct 09 - Cached
  • MEETING THE NEEDS OF HIGH ABILITY AND HIGH POTENTIAL LEARNERS IN THE MIDDLE GRADES A JOINT POSITION STATEMENT OF THE NATIONAL MIDDLE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION AND THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GIFTED CHILDREN
  • The National Association for Gifted Children and the National Middle School Association share a commitment to developing schools and classrooms in which both equity and excellence are persistent goals for each learner. Equity refers to the opportunity of every learner to have supported access to the highest possible quality education. Excellence refers to the need of every learner for opportunities and adult support necessary to maximize his or her learning potential.
  • In light of the inevitable variance in middle school populations, it is critical that middle school educators develop increasing awareness of and skill necessary to address the full range of learner needs—including needs of those who already demonstrate advanced academic abilities and those who have the potential to work at advanced levels.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • IDENTIFICATION All middle school learners need educators who consistently use both formal and informal means of recognizing their particular strengths and needs. In regard to advanced learners, identification requires specific plans to seek out students with advanced abilities or advanced potential in order to provide appropriate educational experiences during the transition into adolescence.
  • ASSESSMENT Ongoing assessment is critical to informing classroom practice. Preassessment, in-process assessments, and post assessments should give learners consistent opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge, understanding, and skill related to topics of study. Assessments related to student readiness, interests, perspectives, and learning preferences provide educators with a consistently emerging understanding of each learner’s needs in the classroom. Middle level educators should use data from such assessments to modify teaching and learning plans to ensure that each student—including those who already perform well beyond expectations—have consistent opportunities to extend their abilities.
  • CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
  • Advanced middle grade learners thus require consistent opportunities to work at degrees of challenge somewhat beyond their particular readiness levels, with support necessary to achieve at the new levels of proficiency. In addition, educators should address student interests and preferred modes of learning in planning curriculum and instruction that is appropriately challenging for individual learners. Educational resources should be of a sufficient range of complexity to ensure challenge for advanced learners. Flexible pacing and flexible grouping arrangements are important instructional adjustments for many highly able middle level learners.
  • AFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT
  • Students benefit greatly from learning environments that reinforce their worth as individuals and simultaneously support them in becoming more powerful and productive. For advanced learners, this may require helping students affirm both their abilities and their need to belong to a peer group. Middle level educators need to understand and address the unique dynamics that high-ability and high-potential young adolescents may experience as they seek to define themselves and their roles among peers.
  • EFFECTIVE PARTNERSHIPS Building a middle school culture that supports equity and excellence for each learner requires sustained attention to partnerships among all adults key to the student’s development. This includes partnerships between home and school, specialists and generalists, and teachers and administrators. Middle level schools should assist parents in recognizing, understanding, and nurturing advanced abilities and potential in young adolescents. Partnerships among team members and between classroom teachers and gifted education specialists should ensure appropriate challenge for advanced learners and appropriate attention to the particular talents of advanced learners. Administrator/teacher partnerships should define what it means to accommodate the individual needs of learners and develop conditions that lead to such accommodations for all middle level learners—including those who demonstrate advanced performance or potential.
  • PRE-SERVICE AND IN-SERVICE STAFF DEVELOPMENT
  • Teachers with training in gifted education are more likely to foster high-level thinking, allow for greater student expression, consider individual variance in their teaching, and understand how to provide high-end challenge. Appropriate staff development for middle level teachers will continually focus on high-quality curriculum, understanding and teaching in response to individual as well as group needs, and developing a repertoire of instructional strategies that support and manage flexible classrooms. Central to the success of these endeavors is shared responsibility for meeting the needs of each learner, evidenced in systematic and consistent planning, carrying out of plans, and evaluation of effectiveness of plans in terms of individual learners and small groups of learners as well as the class as a whole.
  • Teachers, Gifted Education Specialists, and Support Personnel Should: 1. Be knowledgeable about students with advanced academic abilities and those who have the potential to work at advanced levels. 2. Meet regularly to discuss the needs of all students, including those with high ability. 3. Provide curriculum, instruction, and other opportunities to meet the needs of students with high ability. 4. Use a variety of developmentally appropriate instructional practices to enable each student to experience a high degree of personal excellence. 5. Collaborate with colleagues at elementary and high school levels to ensure a smooth transition as students progress throughout the grades. 6. Keep parents informed about their children’s growth and invite parent participation in educational planning for their children.
1 - 2 of 2
Showing 20▼ items per page