Why the cloud cannot obscure the scientific method - 0 views
-
Overall, the foundation of the argument for a replacement for science is correct: the data cloud is changing science, and leaving us in many cases with a Google-level understanding of the connections between things. Where Anderson stumbles is in his conclusions about what this means for science. The fact is that we couldn't have even reached this Google-level understanding without the models and mechanisms that he suggests are doomed to irrelevance.
-
Anderson appears to take the position that the new research part of the equation has become superfluous; simply having a good algorithm that recognizes the correlation is enough.
-
Correlations are a way of catching a scientist's attention, but the models and mechanisms that explain them are how we make the predictions that not only advance science, but generate practical applications.
- ...1 more annotation...
-
This article is a response to Chris Anerson's article "The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete" - http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory