Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ Victims of Crime
Nye Frank

Indexes 7th amendment Constitution, Jury Trial - 0 views

  •  
    Law
Nye Frank

Nursing Database Omits Dangerous Caregivers - 0 views

  •  
    Elder Abuse
Nye Frank

racingnyefrank: Riverside County Homicide Coverup of Nye Frank: district attorney techn... - 0 views

  •  
    Riverside County 27 year old Ty Reddish son of Norco High wrestling and gov teacher attacked a 68 year old man and strangled him. The audio of the sheriff interview has the father telling the prosecutor and sheriff how he got help from the Legislative rep his past student Brian Floyd and high up contacts in DA office with Rod Pacheco. The crime was blamed on the elder and even a article from the prosecutor office put out to create bias, then a news black out http://www.blogger.com/comment-iframe.g?blogID=6398268369518854695&postID=684618289891408525&blogspotRpcToken=841216#%7B%22color%22%3A%22%23333333%22%2C%22backgroundColor%22%3A%22%23ffffff%22%2C%22unvisitedLinkColor%22%3A%22%235588aa%22%2C%22fontFamily%22%3A%22Georgia%2C%20Serif%22%7D
Nye Frank

South Carolina Criminal Defense Blog :: Published by Myrtle Beach, South Carolina Crimi... - 0 views

  •  
    "Automobiles, 1 International Harvester Truck, and 235 Night Vision Scopes. Lost, stolen and damaged equipment : 1975 pieces for a total value of $7.5 million."
Nye Frank

S. 795: Elder Justice Act of 2009 (GovTrack.us) - 0 views

  •  
    Crimes Causing Harm to Property Depending on the value of the property involved, as well as the level of violence, most property crimes fall into the category of felony in Texas. The legal definition of theft is unlawfully taking the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property. This definition is much broader than what most people think of as theft. It includes embezzlement, keeping found property without making a reasonable attempt to find its rightful owner, obtaining the services of another person or telecommunication services by fraud, shoplifting, unauthorized access to credit cards, and writing bad checks. Robbery is similar to theft; in fact, theft is a part of robbery. A person commits robbery if, during a theft, he or she intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another person, threatens a person, or places another person in fear of immediate injury or death. Aggravated robbery, which is a felony of the first degree, is a robbery in which a person is seriously injured or in which the defendant uses a deadly weapon. If the robbery causes fear of immediate injury or death to a victim who is 65 years of age or older, or who has a mental, physical, or developmental disability, the crime also constitutes an aggravated robbery. Burglary is entering into a building, portion of a building, or habitation with the intent to commit theft or a felony there. Not only is it burglary to enter a house unlawfully with the intent to steal money or property, but it is also burglary to enter with the intent to commit a felony such as arson or murder. White Collar Crimes http://www.weblocator.com/attorney/tx/law/c13.html#txc130500
Nye Frank

Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress) - 0 views

  •  
    Not law yet
Nye Frank

Police Misconduct and Civil Rights - Learn About the Law - 0 views

  •  
    "Civil Rights Laws and Police Misconduct A statute known as Section 1983 is the primary civil rights law victims of police misconduct rely upon. This law was originally passed as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, which was intended to curb oppressive conduct by government and private individuals participating in vigilante groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan. It is now called Section 1983 because that is where the law has been published, within Title 42, of the United States Code. Section 1983 makes it unlawful for anyone acting under the authority of state law to deprive another person of his or her rights under the Constitution or federal law. The most common claims brought against police officers are false arrest (or false imprisonment), malicious prosecution, and use of excessive or unreasonable force."
Nye Frank

AddThis Social Bookmarking Sharing Button Widget - 0 views

  •  
    Contents [hide] 1 Text 2 Rights under the Sixth Amendment 2.1 Speedy trial 2.2 Public trial 2.3 Impartial jury 2.4 Notice of accusation 2.5 Confrontation 2.6 Counsel 2.6.1 Self-representation 3 Related court cases 4 References 5 External links http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Rights_under_the_Sixth_Amendment
  •  
    Contents [hide] 1 Text 2 Rights under the Sixth Amendment 2.1 Speedy trial 2.2 Public trial 2.3 Impartial jury 2.4 Notice of accusation 2.5 Confrontation 2.6 Counsel 2.6.1 Self-representation 3 Related court cases 4 References 5 External links http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Rights_under_the_Sixth_Amendment
Nye Frank

CRS/LII Annotated Constitution Fifth Amendment - 0 views

  •  
    "This formal approach to the meaning of due process could obviously have limited both Congress and the state legislatures in the development of procedures unknown to English law. But when California's abandonment of indictment by grand jury was challenged, the Court refused to be limited by the fact that such proceeding was the English practice and that Coke had indicated that it was a proceeding required as "the law of the land." The meaning of the Court in Murray's Lessee was "that a process of law, which is not otherwise forbidden, must be taken to be due process of law, if it can show the sanction of settled usage both in England and in this country; but it by no means follows that nothing else can be due process of law." To hold that only historical, traditional procedures can constitute due process , the Court said, "would be to deny every quality of the law but its age, and to render it incapable [p.1348] of progress or improvement." 23 Therefore, in observing the due process guarantee, it was concluded, the Court must look "not [to] particular forms of procedures, but [to] the very substance of individual rights to life, liberty, and property." The due process clause prescribed "the limits of those fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all our civil and political institutions. . . . It follows that any legal proceeding enforced by public authority, whether sanctioned by age and custom, or newly devised in the discretion of the legislative power, in furtherance of the general public good, which regards and preserves these principles of liberty and justice, must be held to be due process of law." 24"
Nye Frank

Google Sidewiki entry about Anti-social behaviour | Home Office - 0 views

  •  
    1999 Stalking Law changes. 1) Menacing by Stalking, a misdemeanor 1st degree, is enhanced on a second offense to a felony 5th degree regardless of whether the offenses involved the same victim. Multiple convictions of telephone harassment, regardless if the same victim is involved, is also a felony (except when there are only threats to property). (Eff. 3-30-99) 2) Stalking is enhanced to a Felony 4th degree for any of the nine factors listed in Section (B)(2), including priors, use of threats, trespassing, victim is a minor, history of violence, had a weapon, under protection order, serious damage to property, or prior mental illness. Bail may be denied (ORC 2937.222(A)) when stalking is a felony. The Criminal Stalking Protection Order has been expanded to include "the alleged victim or a family or household member of an alleged victim," who may request the order, must then be protected, and must be provided a copy of the protection order (2903.213(A) to (D) & (G) and 2919.26(A) to (D), (G), &(I). (eff.10-27-99) 1999 - Penalty for hit and skip drivers is increased to a felony. Drunk drivers were leaving the accident scene for two hours and then turning themselves in, since leaving the scene was a lesser crime than being tested and convicted for a DUI. (O.R.C 4511.75, 4549.99 - Eff. 3-22-99) 1998 - A new Civil Stalking Protection Order allows a Common Pleas Court to issue a stalking protection order regardless of whether or not criminal charges are filed against the alleged offender. The law also specifically states that an invitation by the victim does not nullify the order and that victim advocates are allowed to accompany the victim throughout the proceedings. (ORC 2930.214, Eff. 7-29-98) 1998 - Due to problems with judges dismissing domestic violence cases against the prosecutors wishes, the law was amended so that a judge does not have the authority to dismiss criminal charges solely at the request of the complaining w
« First ‹ Previous 161 - 180 of 358 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page