RE frequently claims to achieve such outcomes but often results in a cosmetic application and pastiche of historic “nature” (Pierce 1994). Even if native/indigenous plants are capable of mitigating these issues there is a high likelihood that non-native plants will be more effective without necessarily excluding native fauna (Low 1999, 2003). Broadening restoration from the attempted reconstruction of historical states to focus on delivering ecosystem services, resources, productivity, and resilience is paramount to improving its urban compatibility and effectiveness. This objective would be better achieved without dogmatic bias to nativism and indigenous plants, especially in areas where these no longer occur.