Group items tagged

The first problem is that social media tends to get only a certain kind of idea down.

These platforms are conversational which makes us overly concerned with publishing interesting stuff.

But here’s the problem — I’m embedded within a pretty advanced group of people in educational technology. Ideas that we think are common might be revolutionary for others. But we’ll never produce posts or tweets about them because everyone in our clan already knows them.

And the stuff that we do produce assumes you share our background, so it’s not always readable outside our clan.

But for a nontrivial set of things if information is going to useful to the circles it moves to it is going to need to be recontextualized and reframed.

different technologies excel at different stages.

federated wiki which allows the sort of communal wiki experience, but also supports those earlier stages of the knowledge life cycle.

You’re looking for a system that produces what Polanyi called “spontaneous order”.

Minority voices are squelched, flame wars abound. We spend hours at a time as rats hitting the Skinner-esque levers of Twitter and Tumblr, hoping for new treats — and this might be OK if we actually then built off these things, but we don’t. We’re stuck in an attention economy feedback loop that doesn’t allow us silent spaces to reflect on issues without news pegs, and in which many of our areas of collaboration have become toxic, or worse, a toxic bureaucracy. We’re stuck in an attention economy feedback loop where we react to the reactions of reactions (while fearing further reactions), and then we wonder why we’re stuck with groupthink and ideological gridlock.