When it comes to high school, both agreed that the current model is outdated. As Khan put it, "Kids get promoted because they were in a chair for four years." Duncan called it a "19th century model" and "neanderthal." Instead, they suggested a competency-based model for promotion through grades rather than one that is time-based.
In terms of content and standards, Duncan suggested adding subjects such as computer science, foreign language and financial literacy to the core curriculum. He adamantly defended the Common Core standards as a way for the U.S. to remain competitive globally and ensure requirements don't get dumbed down "to make politicians look good."
1More
Van Meter: Competency-Based Grading - 0 views
Are Grades Utterly Useless? | The Tempered Radical - 0 views
Obama's big second-term education problem - 0 views
Kristen Beck - The Heart of a Middle School Teacher: If I Don't Grade It, The Students ... - 0 views
MeTA musings: SBG is more than teach, test, reassess [A fable] - 0 views
Poor ranking on international test misleading about U.S. student performance, Stanford ... - 0 views
How to Fuel Students' Learning Through Their Interests | MindShift - 0 views
Waukee Community School District » Progress Report Rubrics - 1 views
Badges - MozillaWiki - 0 views
2More
Waukee school board studies calendar issues through survey | Des Moines Register Staff ... - 0 views
7More
Are You Ready for Common Core Math? | District Administration Magazine - 0 views
Enough with the Late Penalties! | Tom Schimmer - 0 views
On Life Without Grades | Yale Law School - 0 views
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 48
Next ›
Showing 20▼ items per page