se methodological challenges, this article seeks to explore two stories together. In one, southern Africans of the early nineteenth century adapted guns and skills to local circumstances, and mimeomorphic firearm skills that would appear to be universal turn out to be subject to local variation. As local adaptations occurred, guns improved, game disappeared, and skills declined. This is an empirical argument that contradicts cherished myths about colonial frontiersmen in southern Africa being natural marksmen, as well as less pleasant myths about the technological incompetence of Africans. Meanwhile, a related body of evidence emerges that is best examined through discourse analysis. This is the story of changing settler representations of firearms and shooting skills. Over the course of the nineteenth century, depictions of guns shifted emphasis. Early on, settlers described guns as ordinary frontier artifacts, but by the 1870s they depicted them as dangerous tools that, in skilled hands, could be used either to support or to undermine the emerging colonial or