Group items tagged

One fundamental instrument to ace as a framework overseer is SSH. SSH, or Secure Shell, is a convention used to safely sign onto remote frameworks. It is the most widely recognized approach to get to remote Linux and Unix-like servers.  There are two or three ways that you can get to a shell (summon line) remotely on most Linux/Unix frameworks. One of the more established courses is to utilize the telnet program, which is accessible on most system skilled working frameworks. Getting to a shell account through the telnet strategy however represents a risk in that everything that you send or get over that telnet session is obvious in plain content on your neighborhood system, and the nearby system of the machine you are associating with. So any individual who can "sniff" the association in the middle of can see your username, secret key, email that you read, and charges that you run. Therefore you require a more refined system than telnet to associate with a remote host.  SSH, which is an acronym for Secure SHell, was planned and made to give the best security while getting to another PC remotely. Not just does it scramble the session, it gives better confirmation offices, and in addition highlights like secure document exchange, X session sending, port sending and all the more with the goal that you can build the security of different conventions. It can utilize diverse types of encryption extending anywhere in the range of 512 piece on up to as high as 32768 bits and incorporates figures like AES (Advanced Encryption Scheme), Triple DES, Blowfish, CAST128 or Arcfour. Obviously, the higher the bits, the more it will take to produce and utilize keys and in addition the more it will take to disregard information the association.

One fundamental instrument to ace as a framework overseer is SSH. SSH, or Secure Shell, is a convention used to safely sign onto remote frameworks. It is the most widely recognized approach to get to remote Linux and Unix-like servers.  There are two or three ways that you can get to a shell (summon line) remotely on most Linux/Unix frameworks. One of the more established courses is to utilize the telnet program, which is accessible on most system skilled working frameworks. Getting to a shell account through the telnet strategy however represents a risk in that everything that you send or get over that telnet session is obvious in plain content on your neighborhood system, and the nearby system of the machine you are associating with. So any individual who can "sniff" the association in the middle of can see your username, secret key, email that you read, and charges that you run. Therefore you require a more refined system than telnet to associate with a remote host.  SSH, which is an acronym for Secure SHell, was planned and made to give the best security while getting to another PC remotely. Not just does it scramble the session, it gives better confirmation offices, and in addition highlights like secure document exchange, X session sending, port sending and all the more with the goal that you can build the security of different conventions. It can utilize diverse types of encryption extending anywhere in the range of 512 piece on up to as high as 32768 bits and incorporates figures like AES (Advanced Encryption Scheme), Triple DES, Blowfish, CAST128 or Arcfour. Obviously, the higher the bits, the more it will take to produce and utilize keys and in addition the more it will take to disregard information the association.

Also, clients will see an immense distinction in regards to Ubuntu Software Center (Figure 3). That is on account of it's gone. Ubuntu has moved to GNOME Software, which is as a rule effectively created, is more develop, and will include new components, for example, the capacity to redesign the OS and firmware from the application. Ubuntu is a precarious appropriation. As much as I cherish it on my home server, my desktop is an alternate ballgame. As far as I can tell, discharges between LTS variants have numerous new innovations that might possibly make due in the following LTS. There were numerous advances or elements that Canonical believed were aspiring - HUD, exploring different avenues regarding menus, online dash seek, Ubuntu Software Center, and so on - however they were deserted. In this way, if I somehow managed to utilize Ubuntu on my desktop, I would at present pick LTS. The issue with any LTS discharge, nonetheless, is that it sort of gets solidified in time, and you need to backport everything or utilize PPA to get the most recent variant of uses or bundles. There are numerous situations where the same bundle is not accessible for all Ubuntu discharges. That is the reason I utilize Arch on my desktop. Talking about applications, the tremendous news for desktop clients is that 16.04 at long last conveys Snap bundles to Ubuntu. Snaps are the eventual fate of uses on Ubuntu stage - from desktop to portable.

Also, clients will see an immense distinction in regards to Ubuntu Software Center (Figure 3). That is on account of it's gone. Ubuntu has moved to GNOME Software, which is as a rule effectively created, is more develop, and will include new components, for example, the capacity to redesign the OS and firmware from the application. Ubuntu is a precarious appropriation. As much as I cherish it on my home server, my desktop is an alternate ballgame. As far as I can tell, discharges between LTS variants have numerous new innovations that might possibly make due in the following LTS. There were numerous advances or elements that Canonical believed were aspiring - HUD, exploring different avenues regarding menus, online dash seek, Ubuntu Software Center, and so on - however they were deserted. In this way, if I somehow managed to utilize Ubuntu on my desktop, I would at present pick LTS. The issue with any LTS discharge, nonetheless, is that it sort of gets solidified in time, and you need to backport everything or utilize PPA to get the most recent variant of uses or bundles. There are numerous situations where the same bundle is not accessible for all Ubuntu discharges. That is the reason I utilize Arch on my desktop. Talking about applications, the tremendous news for desktop clients is that 16.04 at long last conveys Snap bundles to Ubuntu. Snaps are the eventual fate of uses on Ubuntu stage - from desktop to portable.

At present, there are three variants of NFS. NFS form 2 (NFSv2) is more established and generally bolstered. NFS form 3 (NFSv3) underpins safe nonconcurrent composes and is more hearty at mistake taking care of than NFSv2; it likewise bolsters 64-bit record sizes and balances, permitting customers to get to more than 2Gb of document information.  NFS form 4 (NFSv4) works through firewalls and on the Internet, no more requires a rpcbind administration, bolsters ACLs, and uses stateful operations. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 underpins NFSv2, NFSv3, and NFSv4 customers. At the point when mounting a document framework through NFS, Red Hat Enterprise Linux utilizes NFSv4 as a matter of course, if the server underpins it.  All forms of NFS can utilize Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) running over an IP system, with NFSv4 requiring it. NFSv2 and NFSv3 can utilize the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) running over an IP system to give a stateless system association between the customer and server.  At the point when utilizing NFSv2 or NFSv3 with UDP, the stateless UDP association (under typical conditions) has less convention overhead than TCP. This can interpret into better execution on clean, non-congested systems. In any case, on the grounds that UDP is stateless, if the server goes down suddenly, UDP customers keep on saturating the system with solicitations for the server. Moreover, when a casing is lost with UDP, the whole RPC ask for must be retransmitted; with TCP, just the lost casing should be loathe. Consequently, TCP is the favored convention when associating with a NFS server.

At present, there are three variants of NFS. NFS form 2 (NFSv2) is more established and generally bolstered. NFS form 3 (NFSv3) underpins safe nonconcurrent composes and is more hearty at mistake taking care of than NFSv2; it likewise bolsters 64-bit record sizes and balances, permitting customers to get to more than 2Gb of document information.  NFS form 4 (NFSv4) works through firewalls and on the Internet, no more requires a rpcbind administration, bolsters ACLs, and uses stateful operations. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 underpins NFSv2, NFSv3, and NFSv4 customers. At the point when mounting a document framework through NFS, Red Hat Enterprise Linux utilizes NFSv4 as a matter of course, if the server underpins it.  All forms of NFS can utilize Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) running over an IP system, with NFSv4 requiring it. NFSv2 and NFSv3 can utilize the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) running over an IP system to give a stateless system association between the customer and server.  At the point when utilizing NFSv2 or NFSv3 with UDP, the stateless UDP association (under typical conditions) has less convention overhead than TCP. This can interpret into better execution on clean, non-congested systems. In any case, on the grounds that UDP is stateless, if the server goes down suddenly, UDP customers keep on saturating the system with solicitations for the server. Moreover, when a casing is lost with UDP, the whole RPC ask for must be retransmitted; with TCP, just the lost casing should be loathe. Consequently, TCP is the favored convention when associating with a NFS server.

The framework is currently a ftp server and can acknowledge associations. To arrange the server to consequently begin the administration at boot time, execute the charge chkconfig vsftpd on as root. To stop the server, execute the order administration vsftpd stop.  Document Transfer Protocol (FTP) is one of the most seasoned and most ordinarily utilized conventions found on the Internet today. Its motivation is to dependably exchange documents between PC has on a system without requiring the client to log specifically into the remote host or know about how to utilize the remote framework. It permits clients to get to records on remote frameworks utilizing a standard arrangement of basic summons.  The Very Secure FTP Daemon (vsftpd) is planned from the beginning to be quick, stable, and, above all, safe. Its capacity to handle vast quantities of associations productively and safely is the reason vsftpd is the main stand-alone FTP conveyed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux.  In Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the vsftpd bundle gives the Very Secure FTP daemon. Run the rpm - q vsftpd order to check whether vsftpd is introduced:

The framework is currently a ftp server and can acknowledge associations. To arrange the server to consequently begin the administration at boot time, execute the charge chkconfig vsftpd on as root. To stop the server, execute the order administration vsftpd stop.  Document Transfer Protocol (FTP) is one of the most seasoned and most ordinarily utilized conventions found on the Internet today. Its motivation is to dependably exchange documents between PC has on a system without requiring the client to log specifically into the remote host or know about how to utilize the remote framework. It permits clients to get to records on remote frameworks utilizing a standard arrangement of basic summons.  The Very Secure FTP Daemon (vsftpd) is planned from the beginning to be quick, stable, and, above all, safe. Its capacity to handle vast quantities of associations productively and safely is the reason vsftpd is the main stand-alone FTP conveyed with Red Hat Enterprise Linux.  In Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the vsftpd bundle gives the Very Secure FTP daemon. Run the rpm - q vsftpd order to check whether vsftpd is introduced:

The vsftpd FTP daemon runs kept of course. SELinux arrangement characterizes how vsftpd communicates with documents, forms, and with the framework as a rule. For instance, when a verified client sign in by means of FTP, they can't read from or keep in touch with records in their home catalogs: SELinux keeps vsftpd from getting to client home registries as a matter of course. Additionally, as a matter of course, vsftpd does not have admittance to NFS or CIFS volumes, and unknown clients don't have compose access, regardless of the possibility that such compose access is arranged in/and so forth/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf. Booleans can be empowered to permit the beforehand said access.  The accompanying illustration shows a verified client signing in, and a SELinux foreswearing when attempting to view records in their home catalog:  Run the rpm - q ftp order to check whether the ftp bundle is introduced. On the off chance that it is not, run the yum introduce ftp order as the root client to introduce it.  Run the rpm - q vsftpd order to check whether the vsftpd bundle is introduced. On the off chance that it is not, run the yum introduce vsftpd order as the root client to introduce it.  In Red Hat Enterprise Linux, vsftpd just permits mysterious clients to sign in as a matter of course. To permit validated clients to sign in, alter/and so on/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf as the root client. Ensure the local_enable=YES choice is uncommented:

The vsftpd FTP daemon runs kept of course. SELinux arrangement characterizes how vsftpd communicates with documents, forms, and with the framework as a rule. For instance, when a verified client sign in by means of FTP, they can't read from or keep in touch with records in their home catalogs: SELinux keeps vsftpd from getting to client home registries as a matter of course. Additionally, as a matter of course, vsftpd does not have admittance to NFS or CIFS volumes, and unknown clients don't have compose access, regardless of the possibility that such compose access is arranged in/and so forth/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf. Booleans can be empowered to permit the beforehand said access.  The accompanying illustration shows a verified client signing in, and a SELinux foreswearing when attempting to view records in their home catalog:  Run the rpm - q ftp order to check whether the ftp bundle is introduced. On the off chance that it is not, run the yum introduce ftp order as the root client to introduce it.  Run the rpm - q vsftpd order to check whether the vsftpd bundle is introduced. On the off chance that it is not, run the yum introduce vsftpd order as the root client to introduce it.  In Red Hat Enterprise Linux, vsftpd just permits mysterious clients to sign in as a matter of course. To permit validated clients to sign in, alter/and so on/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf as the root client. Ensure the local_enable=YES choice is uncommented:

Screencast Tutorial about how to get Free to Air Digital Television DVB working using USB Device in Ubuntu Linux with Me TV software.

OSGUI.com Community Tech Support Forums (The ONLY way to get free help from Tim)

...Ubuntu 11.04 and 11.10 users do not need to download or add any PPAs in order to get the update: just keep an eye on update manager over the next day or so to upgrade...

TypeCatcher is a Apps that allows you to search, browse, download and automatically install the sources of Google Web Fonts into ubuntu desktop or ubuntu based distro with just a few mouse clicks. You can also preview fonts with adjustable size and text.

"Death of the command line revisited Five years ago I wrote a little blurb called Death of the command line. As it happened, that article was misunderstood by many who read it - I don't know if it was my fault or theirs, but somehow many readers ended up thinking I was either predicting the demise of CLI's (Command Line Interfaces) or hoping for that demise or both. Nothing could have been farther from the truth. I remain a big fan of CLI's and use them daily. And yet, just five years later and still at risk of angering yet another batch of folk who won't read carefully, I'm going to suggest that predicting the death of the CLI may not be such a bad bet after all. What triggered this was that I happened to be doing a bit of editing to another article - Using the shell (Terminal) in Mac OS X. As I made some corrections, I thought "Nobody cares about this nowadays". That's not entirely true. That particular page still gets five thousand or more visitors every month and has even been "plussed" a few times, so obviously a few people still care. On the other hand, in the greater world of folks I run into daily, nobody uses the CLI and most don't even know that they could. But why would you use the CLI?"

A 'howto' with aptitude and other commands to get things going.

This thread explains how to get the 2009 version of Etoys running on Ubuntu.

"Brilliant. I can't really praise Amazon enough for that. It was easy, simple and no fuss."

in this new video screencast tutorial from http://www.OSGUI.com Tech Show I will show you step by step how to turn Ubuntu Linux into Linux Mint. You can turn any version of Ubuntu Linux into Mint. Ubuntu Linux 9.04 Jaunty into Linux Mint 7 Gloria Ubuntu Linux 9.10 Karmic Koala into Linux Mint 8 Helena. In this demo Im using the 64bit version of Ubuntu Linux 9.10 and I install the packages for Mint 8 Helena to get the new advanced gnome menu and Mint artwork.