An article highlighting recent criticism for the accuracy of published Medical Journals, origins of the issue, and possible solutions for the future.
Impact Factor and the Future of Medical Journals
Some research publications are getting away from flawed measures of influence that make it easy to game the system.
This year's Nobel Prize winner in physiology, Randy Scheckman, announced his decision to boycott the three major “luxury” journals: Science, Nature, and Cell.
impact factor, defined as the number of citations divided by the number of papers published in the journal, which is a measure to convey the influence of journals and the research they carry.
Journals employ several strategies to artificially raise the impact factor
caught trying to induce authors to increase the number of citations
cite each other’s articles
citations are barely a reflection of the quality of the research and that the impact factor is easily manipulated
shing’s growth is actually one of its g
overwhelmed with the avalanche of information
current system of peer-review, which originated in the 18th century, is now stressed
future of the medical journal was, he summed it up in just one word: “Digital.”
more innovative approache
PLOS One, which provides individual article metrics to anyone who accesses the article.
Instead of letting the reputation of the journal decide the impact of its papers, PLOS One provides information about the influence of the article on a more granular level.
future of medical publishing is a democratic one
Smart software will decide based on largely open access journals which papers will be of most interest to a particular reader.
Biology Direct, a journal that provides open peer review that is available for readers to read along with the article, with or without changes suggested by the reviewers.