Group items tagged

A commons is an asset over which a community has shared and equal rights. This could, in principle, include land, water, minerals, knowledge, scientific research and software. But at the moment most of these assets have been enclosed: seized by either the state or private interests and treated as any other form of capital. Through this enclosure, we have been deprived of our common wealth.

The restoration of the commons has great potential not only to distribute wealth but also to change society. As the writer David Bollier points out, a commons is not just a resource (land or trees or software) but also the community of people managing and protecting it. The members of the commons develop much deeper connections with each other and their assets than we do as passive consumers of corporate products.

Managing common resources means developing rules, values and traditions. It means, in some cases, re-embedding ourselves in the places in which we live. It means reshaping government to meet the needs of communities, not corporations. In other words, reviving the commons can act as a counterweight to the atomising, alienating forces now generating a thousand forms of toxic reaction.

Here’s part 2 of the Questionnaire analysis – and exceptionally cheering it is too. I asked you what you thought were the benefits of co-production for participants, organisations and for practitioners (i.e. you). As previously, I merged duplicates and organised the responses thematically. But whichever way you look at it, co-production is thoroughly, entirely, stunningly, profoundly and utterly cowen lush with bells on.