While I was already familiar with a number of OER websites, I was surprised to learn of a few that were new to me. I have shared the complete list below.
Just as the real computing revolution didn't happen until the computer became truly personal, the real IT revolution in teaching and learning won't happen until each student builds a personal cyberinfrastructure that is as thoughtfully, rigorously, and expressively composed as an excellent essay or an ingenious experiment.
Pointing students to data buckets and conduits we've already made for them won't do. Templates and training wheels may be necessary for a while, but by the time students get to college, those aids all too regularly turn into hindrances. For students who have relied on these aids, the freedom to explore and create is the last thing on their minds, so deeply has it been discouraged.
To provide students the guidance they need to reach these goals, faculty and staff must be willing to lead by example — to demonstrate and discuss, as fellow learners, how they have created and connected their own personal cyberinfrastructures. Like the students, faculty and staff must awaken their own self-efficacy within the myriad creative possibilities that emerge from the new web.
ELMS stands for e-Learning Management System. ELMS is a completely open source project built on top of the Drupal Content Management System. Drupal is one of the largest open source communities in existence today and gives developers access to thousands of community contributed and supported modules and themes.
The grass is always greener in some respects. Ultimately MT plays in our infrastructure and scales the way we need. Really the difference in the communities around MT and WP is one of the biggest differences. This article outlines how those differences evolved.
Only 10 percent of colleges have begun phasing out their physical computer labs, even though the vast majority of students now own laptops, according to the Campus Computing Project. A full two-thirds of respondents to last fall’s survey said they had decided not to phase out their labs. Yet all of the technologists contacted by Inside Higher Ed agreed that virtual computing labs are bound to emerge to supplement physical computer labs across higher education, and some even suggested that the rooms where students currently tap away on campus-owned computers will eventually yield to the virtual kind.
Well before the term entered the popular lexicon via a recent Microsoft advertising campaign, “the cloud” was transforming how college students interact with their coursework.
I never thought of the power behind MS' "the cloud" advertising campaign ... even my own 9 year old now says that ... and we aren't Windows users. I wonder if that commercial is enough to tip the scale on a student's understanding of cloud services. Interesting.
In a virtual computing lab, students log in via a secured website and choose from a library of “images” — virtual desktops outfitted with different versions of various programs. The selected image then appears as a window on the student’s own computer desktop, at which point students can open a program and begin working. They can save or print their work just as though the program were running on their own hard drives.
I know IST has been doing it for several years. They had a lot of technical problems, which I hope they have (and we can) overcome. It did give students access to a lot of high end software that they couldn't have otherwise. I'll be curious to see how CLC's solution affects lab usage patterns.
I assume we would need a laptop or a netbook program at PSU to make this really work, but as you all know, I a big fan of the idea of phasing out physical computer labs.
I'm not sure we would need a laptop program. Our own survey numbers point to close to 100% ownership by students as it is. In the short term, remote application services would not be able to replace the labs. We would use this service at first for very specialized software that a relatively few use. The number of students using our labs is staggering ... I now have numbers broken down by College and the students in the Liberal Arts are the largest population. Something we should look more closely at.
I'd love to see those numbers, and to start putting some meaning behind them. What are the patterns of usage in different disciplines/colleges? I think some of it comes down to software needs, but also instructional styles, how technology is utilized in a discipline, college culture, and how affordances of labs match up with those things. I'm not sure the answer is so much reducing computer lab seats as much as understanding what people are doing and building spaces with that knowledge.
If the CLA is the biggest user of the labs and much of what students are doing is printing, it would make sense for us to initiate a move toward paperless teaching and learning. If we are able to use the iPads for faculty after the pilot in ENGL, then perhaps we can fold that into a larger initiative.