Group items tagged

A very simple video about what makes teachers great

I think the strongest piece of the video is setting strong goals or setting high expectations. In my experience as an educator and the principal of a successul "A" rated school, students will rise to the expectations we set for them.

To me this video just shows that matter what your qualifications are (highly qualified, effective, ineffective, etc) when you are truly listening to your students, you are a great teacher. Very refreshing. I needed this.

This article makes a great point about an achievement gap statistic. A black or Hispanic 12th grader has reading and math skills comparable to a white 8th grader. I appreciate this article because there are no excuses, just a desire to fix what is broken.

I appreciate the reality of this article. Normally, I get upset when I read about educational reform; however, this article laid out a truth to reform. I agree that the decisions of our government went "the wrong way on education." But, I appreciate Booker's message: "I am no longer concerned with right and left. I just want to go forward!" This is what we all need to focus on. Our students. They need to be what we fight for.

Yet another article about school reform that completely leaves the role of parents out. Until parents have the ability to support their children at home and set high, achievable expectations, true reform will never be possible. Unfortunately, this is one aspect of that administrators cannot control, no matter how many reform plans they invent or enact.

Jill, I really enjoyed this article! It is an interesting perspective for me, an elementary teacher, who never gets a chance to witness the great things that are being done at the high school level. Like you, I think it's truly important for higher education discussions to begin earlier than high school...the earlier, the better. Students need to have the mentality that they CAN and WILL go to college because it is their educational right, despite any hardships they may have to face. Building excitement in school based on school spirit days (Represent Your Alma Mater Day) or field trips to see what is available can instill the excitement and motivation of higher education. Thanks for sharing!

Wow! Jill what a great program to be a part of. How do your students react to this experience? Are they open to asking questions? Do they show genuine interest and intrigue? Also, I agree that there needs to be a "YES I CAN" attitude. This takes more than just a teacher though. It takes a the school as a community to instill these ideas into students. By teaching students the possibilities and starting their intrigue in higher education earlier, I think there can be a change in mind-set. At the high school level, I see many of my ELL students doubt their abilities or chances of attending college, so they never allow that dream to come into their minds. With the right encouragement and guidance, this can change.

Great article Jill. Pike started a really neat college initiative this year that involved the elementary, middle and high schools. It involved teachers discussing colleges during academic advisory times, decorating classrooms and wearing college gear on certain days. Although I do not have college bound students in my classroom, we still decorated my door and I had several students come in my classroom asking about IU. I was able to share my experience with them. This initiative was able to provide students with a chance to talk with teachers about real life experiences. I don't know what they were doing at the elementary level, but I would be interested to see what activities took place, as I think early exposure is necessary. It would be worthwhile to also have parents involved at an early age, especially for students whose parents did not attend college.

This article highlights some of the changes that suburban schools are just now facing, that urban schools have been facing for years. 

I thought the first section you highlighted about kids and their parents perceptions is valuable. It is a 2 way street between home and school and it has to be united for student success. If parents are not supportive and can not help their students, clearly there is going to be decrease in student performance. I think families are the most important relationship to establish. There are so many different groups that need to come together in order to fix this crisis...the thought seems difficult...almost impossible.

One point that I thought Kennedy left out of her arguments was parent support. Oftentimes, students are coming to schools with their parents' view of school, both positive and negative. If parents had trouble in school or have negative feelings toward schooling, they are less likely to be positive about it with their kids. The amount of support at home can make or break a student. Furthermore, reforms can come and go, but parent support is often the determining factor of success. This trend may begin to exemplify that notion as both urban and suburban schools face the same issues. I will be interested to see if the parents of the students in suburban schools are much more supportive and the difference that will make when the playing field is evened.

High-performing urban schools have climates that nurture the commitment and engagement of teachers, parents, and students. This short video by Dr. Lynne Perez from the National Center for Urban School Transformation and Power Pont detail the perspectives/attitudes of parents, teachers, and students from successful urban schools.

I agree that students wanting to come to school is a big part of it's success. I really dislike hearing from students "I hate this school" etc. That is why nurturing them and making them feel wanted is important. If they feel wanted then they will want to be at school. When parents see this and hear from their child how much they enjoy being at school they will also be on board too. Thank you for sharing this!

I think the concept of this video is relevant. Brian you said you do not believe you are a nurturer; however, I think all educators are to some degree. I think nurturer is often translated to caudle, which is not the case. Teachers have an obligation to provide their students with the best possible education. This education does not just develop overnight. It takes a variety of components to bring it all together. We know students need to feel safe in their environment. We know that students need to feel accepted in order to collaborate and communicate to the best of their abilities. If students feel stifled, they lose to drive to achieve in a class. A big part of this develops within the social and emotional aspects of school. With this is mind, educators are nurturers. Doesn't mean you can't hold your students to high standards. Doesn't mean you let them make excuses for themselves. No matter traditional or progressive. Strict or lenient. Teachers by nature are nurturers because we help our students. I am a high school teacher too, and I still make sure that my students are comfortable and confident in their classroom because I know they will engage and learn more if I do.

Take two kids, one from a low-income family, the other middle class. Let them run around and do little-kid things in their respective homes and then, at age 5, enroll them in kindergarten.

I feel this shows how important it is to start educating children at a young age.

This topic/article really strikes home for me. One of my dearest friends works in Mississippi in a Pre-K class. Her effervescent personality, dedication, and perservance would make any child want to come to school. She is in a very high poverty school system but overcomes this obstacle in her teaching and with her students. Preschool children are at an age where money and SES have no baring but influence and change do. Thanks for sharing this article!

I got ahead of myself and posted before I highlighted or captured...i'll have to experiment more closely with Diigo on my next post! I thought this article was interesting because it adds the community component to urban school reform. "Community-based organizations that deal with issues such as housing, health, and regeneration would profit from partnering with schools and working together to improve the lot and the education of children living in these areas as a means of benefiting both schools and the community." This intrigued me as it is a reminder if a child's basic needs are not being met (shelter, health, etc) then school is going to be on the back burner. This collaboration between school and community seems to be a piece to the reform puzzle.

Yes, it was implemented, but I am not sure how fully. Mayor Washington died while in office, and the plan was quite a radical departure from the way urban schools historically were - and still are - run. So, as you can imagine, it was maintained without fidelity (LSCs still exist, but to varying widely in their effectiveness and with much of their power stripped) and other critical parts of the plan were dismantled.

As a teacher in a Title I school, I often find it difficult to contact students' homes since so many students move around during the school year and some parents/guardians tend not to be very receptive. Nonetheless, some of the greatest successes I feel I have had during my two years of teaching have come from parent-teacher conferences that I have called and/or those informal phone calls I do when a student misses five days, begins to fail my class, or is disruptive. The article says "Engaging community groups with schools has the added benefit of helping teachers and other educators to better understand the communities and lifestyles of the children they teach, and thus to better adapt their style to meet their needs." I have formed positive working relationships with many of my students' families, which not only led to an improvement in the students' behavior, but also their academic performance. That old saying "It takes a village to raise a child" also applies to educating them as well.

This article discusses the teacher turnover rate in one group of New York City schools; many of the teachers are either being fired or resigning for their own reasons. While it is definitely important to have the best teachers possible in the classrooms, it seems that schools might not be going about this in the best way possible for the teachers or the students.

Edward, I completely agree with your image of a "bad" teacher and I honestly have never seen one myself either! I know some that might be a little burnt out, but they are still trying their best and doing everything they can to teach their students. I realize that this must not be the case in every school, or at least I am assuming there must be some really "bad" teachers out there since everyone seems to be so eager to get rid of them! And yes, your point about the bottom third is also important--even if every teacher in the school is working hard and doing their best, there still has to be a bottom third that will get fired...

Austin, I would also be interested in hearing from these teachers. If I were in a position like that I think I would feel like I have to keep looking over my shoulder and making sure that I am making administrators happy, rather than focusing on effective teaching strategies for my particular group of students. No two classrooms of students will ever be the same, and that should be taken into consideration accordingly.

Most of you have probably heard of the Halem Project or the Harlem Kid Zone. Most of the critics have cited its dependence on high levels of funding. In the interview Canada mentions the funding cutbacks and challenges. What I like about it is the comprehensive approach to reform. It's not a 7:30 - 3:00 job.

I don't understand how this reform is fiscally possible. Canada mentioned that they had around 10,000 kids in the program and that they had an original budget of 200,000,000 dollars. He then said that it was cut to 10,000,000 dollars. This may be a model that works but the costs seem to be astronomical and any sort of school reform that is going to be widespread will need to not be dependant on expensive programs. Kennedy mentions that reforms fail because teachers give up on them when they don't see results right away and in this case the programs will likely fold because the improvements will either not come right away or not be deemed significant enough to justify the budget required.

I had forgotten that this was a model that was sought to be replicated across the country because of some of its successes in being able to address some of the major issues facing students in the Harlem Children's Zone. An article from 2010 addresses some of the successes, but also points out that the efforts have seen their share of struggles too, including a class of students that was completely dismissed because of students' academic performance, something that public schools would not be able to do (Otterman, 2010). The article also criticizes the funding that is spent per student on average, which also does not include everything that the organization provides to students, and the community as well (Otterman, 2010). It was noteworthy that, at least when the article was written, most of the funding was attained through private donations, though the government was beginning to try to allocate more federal funding to such initiatives. I think the biggest thing I take away from this is the realization of a variety of factors that influence students' performances in the classroom. While people typically focus on how well students do on tests and papers, other areas of their life (such as long-term or short-term illnesses, home life, etc.) unquestionably impact how students do in schools. As many people suffering challenges in their life would see that affect their performance at work, so to it influences students. The organization has done a great job of trying to address a lot of these different areas in an effort to improve students' performances (and, for that matter, their lives). Otterman, S. (2010, October 12). "Lauded Harlem schools have their own problems." New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/13/education/13harlem.html?pagewanted=all

The article, by Jonathan Mahler, was about the heroic efforts of Ramón González, the principal of M.S. 223, a public middle school in the South Bronx, to make his school a place where his young charges can get a decent education and thus, perhaps, a better life.

Educational reforms are rarely about students and while they typically boast the mission of "student success" the majority of teachers and educators I have come into contact with feel a great disconnect between those enacting reforms and the needs they have in the classroom. One of Abraham Lincoln's strongest leadership principles was to "ciculate among the troops" however, it is a very rare event for central office leaders in a school district and the legislators that pass reforms actually set foot in a school much less engage with the teachers who are "on the front lines" in order to learn what the struggles are in today's educational environments.

I think while us (teachers) are wanting reformers to take a "walk in our shoes" with what goes on a day-to-day basis, we teachers have to stop and think no matter what we judge, or want to believe, we have no idea what goes on from the time our students leave in the afternoon until the time they come back the next day. This article goes to show that "yes," 80% of a student's learning comes from school, but then there is that 20% that needs to come from the home.

Located in a low-income community in Chicago, Harper High School graduates just 40 percent of its 1,500 students. Meanwhile, about 35 miles away in suburban Naperville, Illinois, Neuqua Valley High School-a $65 million facility-graduates 99 percent of its students. In an experiment Oprah says was inspired by Rev.

I know have been posting a little too much in the past day, but in undergrad, we watch this documentary by Oprah that showed the difference between the urban and suburban school. I think the video highlights the inequality of schools better; however, the article still gets the point across. Being from around the Chicago-area, I see the differences all the time. Urban schools are in crisis. And it makes it even harder for these failing students when these students see the schools right down the road spending millions of dollars on gymnasiums and libraries.

"Grace says she wishes her mother, also a dropout, had more forcefully explained how much of a struggle life can be without a diploma. Grace says she now feels trapped. "There's no right or left way to turn to get me out of it. It's just constant." she says." This quote from the article stands out to me. I believe that parents have to become involved in the educational process in order to truly accomplish urban reform. While a great teacher can be pretty influential, they cannot always undo what happens or is reinforced/believed at home.