Skip to main content

Home/ T531 Summer 2012/ Group items tagged research

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Jordan Perry

Big Study Links Good Teachers to Lasting Gain - NYTimes.com - 2 views

  • Elementary- and middle-school teachers who help raise their students’ standardized-test scores seem to have a wide-ranging, lasting positive effect on those students’ lives beyond academics, including lower teenage-pregnancy rates and greater college matriculation and adult earnings,
  • “That test scores help you get more education, and that more education has an earnings effect
  • metrics hold teachers accountable and can help improve the educational outcomes of millions of children.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • Critics particularly point to the high margin of error with many value-added ratings, noting that they tend to bounce around for a given teacher from year to year and class to class. But looking at an individual’s value-added score for three or four classes, the researchers found that some consistently outperformed their peers.
  • a student with one excellent teacher for one year between fourth and eighth grade would gain $4,600 in lifetime income
  • The student with the excellent teacher would also be 0.5 percent more likely to attend college.
  • Replacing a poor teacher with an average one would raise a single classroom’s lifetime earnings by about $266,000
  • But controlling for numerous factors, including students’ backgrounds, the researchers found that the value-added scores consistently identified some teachers as better than others, even if individual teachers’ value-added scores varied from year to year.
  • the effect of a good teacher mostly fades after three or four years. But the broader view showed that the students still benefit for years to come.
  • “The message is to fire people sooner rather than later,”
  •  
    This article discusses how teachers who work to improve students test scores are leaving a lasting impression on their students. The more education they are getting by "good teachers" increases the students chances of succeeding. Teachers are working to improve these students test scores and while they are doing this the students are learning more than just what is needed to pass the tests. Schools need better teachers to help students in the long run.
  • ...1 more comment...
  •  
    I think it makes sense that "good" or "excellent" teachers are able to leave such lasting impressions on students well into adulthood, however, I'd be interested in seeing exactly how this study was conducted (sample size, research design, ethical considerations, etc.). I just finished a research methodology course so these types of studies really make me stop and think now. There is no denying that all children should have "good" teachers, but I don't think test scores are always an accurate measure of a teacher or even a student for that matter. For example, a school may have 4 second grade classrooms--3 of the classes are inclusion classrooms while the fourth class has the middle range and higher-level students; I don't know how it could be fair to compare the test scores or teachers in this situation. I feel that there has to be a better and more accurate way to determine whether or not a teacher is doing a "good" job.
  •  
    "Mr. Jones might regularly help raise test scores more than Ms. Smith, but maybe that is because his students are from wealthier families, or because he has a harder-working class - factors that can be difficult for researchers to discern. " This quote stood out to me because it is similar to the argument against merit based pay for teachers in Indiana. We all know that students come to us with an array of prior knowledge, much of which is based on previous experiences and their environment. However, all students are capable of academic growth. What's the harm in evaluating teachers based on the growth their students made during the school year?
  •  
    I knew I want to be a teacher since fourth and fifth grade when I had Mr. Cearfoss. He was one of those effective teachers who changed my life by making me feel successful on a daily basis and believe that I could be successful on a daily basis if I saw value in everything I did. Kind of deep for a fourth and fifth grade teacher, but I remember him attending my baseball games late in the evenings and calling home when he thought I was slacking. He made it clear to me, and the rest of the students, that while he cared about our education in his classroom, he cared even more that we used our education to make the right decisions in our lives after we left his classroom. The average effect of one teacher on a single student is modest. I did not find it surprising that, according to the article, "All else equal, a student with one excellent teacher for one year between fourth and eighth grade would gain $4,600 in lifetime income, compared to a student of similar demographics who has an average teacher. The student with the excellent teacher would also be 0.5 percent more likely to attend college." This is the power that vested, compassionate teachers can have on a student's life. While some of my students will say they like me and others will say the exact opposite, all my students would say that I care about them and care about their success. When a student feels that a person, especially a teacher, cares and believes in them, that student will strive to retain that faith others have in him/her.
Craig Willey

News from the NEPC: Bunkum Awards Spotlight Shoddy Education Research - 1 views

  •  
    Grand Prize Winner Says Charter Schools Should be Like Cancer Contact: Boulder, CO (May 31, 2012) -- The National Education Policy Center (NEPC), housed at the University of Colorado Boulder, has announced via online video the winners of the 2011 Bunkum Awards -presented for the most compellingly lousy educational research for the past year.
  •  
    NEPC might be an organization you are interested in checking out. They provide a unique service to the education community: they arrange careful and timely reviews, by the nation's leading scholars, of foundations' and policy groups' (among other groups) research reports.As can be detected from this headline, they are strategically intervening in the faulty pipeline that puts shoddy "research" results in the hands of policy makers, who often times don't have the background to view these exceedingly complex issues with a nuanced perspective like that we are developing.
Amanda McIntyre

Preschool Reform: 5 Ways to Fix Pre-K in the U.S. - TIME - 3 views

    • Amanda McIntyre
       
      Preschool/Kindergarten are the first steps in an education career.
  •  
    Take two kids, one from a low-income family, the other middle class. Let them run around and do little-kid things in their respective homes and then, at age 5, enroll them in kindergarten.
  • ...3 more comments...
  •  
    "Research shows that when the first day of school rolls around, the child from the low-income household will be as many as 1.5 years behind grade level in terms of language and prereading and premath skills. The middle-class kid will be as many as 1.5 years ahead. This means that, by the time these two 5-year-olds start school, the achievement gap between them is already as great as three years." I used to teach a bilingual prekindergarten class. It was grant-funded and had only 12 children. It was incredible how much progress those children could make in a year. They were nearly all from impoverished families and nearly all spoke exclusively Spanish at home. I had seen many start kindergarten and be "behind" for years. Yet, my students all started well-prepared, most of them reading, counting, and doing simple addition and subtraction. Unfortunately, the organization I worked for did not sustain its finding. Now I work with middle school kids, and although I love working with them, I often feel like I'm cleaning up a mess that could have been prevented through quality pre-kindergarten.
  •  
    You are right, Jill. This is one of the conclusive pieces of educational research out there. And, it's one of the initiatives that has growing support in Indy, yet they can't seem to convince policy-makers at the capitol. Yet another reason why we need to check ourselves when we throw around the phrase "achievement gap" given that there are many structural factors that contribute to differentiated tests scores.
  •  
    I was not surprised at all by the research data of 5 year olds from low-income households compared to those from middle-class households. Lately, the number of students I have in first and second grades with delayed language development is increasing. I am now using teaching time to help catch those students up on basic language skills that their peers have already developed. Those students who have those basic skills are already ahead of the game...think of how much more ahead they will be in the years to come.
  •  
    I feel this shows how important it is to start educating children at a young age.
  •  
    This topic/article really strikes home for me. One of my dearest friends works in Mississippi in a Pre-K class. Her effervescent personality, dedication, and perservance would make any child want to come to school. She is in a very high poverty school system but overcomes this obstacle in her teaching and with her students. Preschool children are at an age where money and SES have no baring but influence and change do. Thanks for sharing this article!
kdamiano

Project-Based Learning: Real-World Issues Motivate Students | Edutopia - 0 views

  • engaging students by starting with the concrete and solving hands-on, real-world problems is a great motivator.
    • kdamiano
       
      We know that students learning through experience, which is why I think PBL can really help reshape and reform what education is and means to this nation. If we want to be the leading country in engineering or mathematics or reading, than we need to allow our students to experience and explore these fields. 
  • "Everybody is motivated by challenge and solving problems, and we don't make use of that in schools enough,"
    • kdamiano
       
      We must hold our students to high expectations. I think allowing them to explore their curiosities and struggles is one of the most useful and impacting ways to learn. 
    • kdamiano
       
      This is where I could see teachers currently seeing a problem because with the restraints schools are placed in with time, curriculum, etc this amount of time is filled to the brim with material. I could see this being a big issue because of what is "expected" of teachers today. 
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • In project-based learning, students try to answer a question -- one that has relevance for them -- that is greater than the immediate task at hand.
  • "One of the major advantages of project work is that it makes school more like real life,"
    • kdamiano
       
      When students have a vested interest in what they are learning, they are more apt to put forth the time. They are more likely try their best. 
  • "in-depth investigation of a real-world topic worthy of children's attention and effort." She advocates a three-phased approach: Phase 1 involves an initial discussion of a project topic, including children's firsthand experiences related to the topic. Phase 2 involves fieldwork, sessions with experts, and various aspects of gathering information, reading, writing, drawing, and computing. Phase 3 is the presentation of the project to an audience.
  • Kids who are excited about what they learn tend to dig more deeply and to expand their interest in learning to a wide array of subjects. They retain what they learn rather than forget it as soon as they disgorge it for a test. They make connections and apply their learning to other problems. They learn how to collaborate, and their social skills improve. They are more confident talking to groups of people, including adults. And, as a number of research reports suggest, project-based learning correlates positively with improved test scores, reduced absenteeism, and fewer disciplinary problems.
    • kdamiano
       
      Isn't it sad that we know this, yet reformer do little to acknowledge the impact of learning like this? 
Jenn Renner

The Limits of School Reform - NYTimes.com - 10 views

  • Going back to the famous Coleman report in the 1960s, social scientists have contended — and unquestionably proved — that students’ socioeconomic backgrounds vastly outweigh what goes on in the school as factors in determining how much they learn.
  • Yet the reformers act as if a student’s home life is irrelevant. “There is no question that family engagement can matter,” said Klein when I spoke to him. “But they seem to be saying that poverty is destiny, so let’s go home.
  • Demonizing teachers for the failures of poor students, and pretending that reforming the schools is all that is needed, as the reformers tend to do, is both misguided and counterproductive.
  •  
    The article, by Jonathan Mahler, was about the heroic efforts of Ramón González, the principal of M.S. 223, a public middle school in the South Bronx, to make his school a place where his young charges can get a decent education and thus, perhaps, a better life.
  • ...5 more comments...
  •  
    Before reading this article, I did not realize that reformers tend to avoid the issue of students' home lives when considering reform--now I understand why Kennedy only focuses on teachers and the classroom environment when discussing reform. However, with all of the research done that tells us how much impact a child's home life can play in their education, why isn't there more focus on this issue? I can only assume it is because it is easier to reach schools and teachers rather than the communities and families, but this method does not seem to be working, in my opinion.
  •  
    "Demonizing teachers for the failures of poor students, and pretending that reforming the schools is all that is needed, as the reformers tend to do, is both misguided and counterproductive." I think this is a good point. Although good teaching is the most essential part of school reform, it's not the only factor that makes children successful. Like Gonzalez, there have been times that I have really worked with a particular student and gotten them started toward success, only to have them move back into a bad situation, drop out of school to work, or some similar situation that is largely beyond my control. I'm not trying to make excuses, but just as I get frustrated when a student does poorly on one test and is judged by a single measure, it can be frustrating as a teacher when one or two statistics are used to judge your entire career.
  •  
    Jenn and Jill, I made a sticky note of the same quote: "Demonizing teachers for the failures of poor students, and pretending that reforming the schools is all that is needed, as the reformers tend to do, is both misguided and counterproductive." I think it is important for schools and reformers to see that school reform is all encompassing with many counterparts and players. I also liked how the article ended with that reform should be handled with a "dose of humility". Fingers shouldn't be pointed when school reform needs to be analyzed by what it has and doesn't have. Thanks for sharing this NYT article - I really enjoyed it.
  •  
    I think this also brings up a good point about exactly where reform efforts can be best put to good use. It's obviously not intended to simply write off students given their socio-economic background or home life. Yet as Joe Nocera highlights from the article that affected him, a single teacher working closely with a student begins to yield results. It would be interesting to see if it's just considered to be from the academic-related help his teacher is giving him, or from the other support - mainly that there is now an adult taking interest in what he does with his life (texts in the mornings to encourage him to attend class, taking the time to show that he has someone to emotionally support him while his mother "comes across as indifferent to his schooling") that he is being shown. It is likely a tremendous combination of both the emotional and academic support, which I think would help to shed light on some ways that reform efforts would be most effective. This piece indicates that a positive influence providing stability could bring just as much (or more) results than anything done to renovate efforts in front of a class of students (which, as Kennedy pointed out, frequently don't get implemented as reformers envision).
  •  
    I think Nocera has some very valid points about why present-day school reform doesn't lead to more immediate changes. It seems as though reformers have been focused on important issues, but ones that are not attacking the problem. While socioeconomic status has been proven capable of overcoming obstacles, it does play a huge factor in the success of students. With that being said, simply attacking the teachers or the instruction isn't the answer either. As Nocera states, "Demonizing teachers for the failures of poor students, and pretending that reforming the schools is all that is needed, as the reformers tend to do, is both misguided and counterproductive." I absolutely agree.
  •  
    Educational reforms are rarely about students and while they typically boast the mission of "student success" the majority of teachers and educators I have come into contact with feel a great disconnect between those enacting reforms and the needs they have in the classroom. One of Abraham Lincoln's strongest leadership principles was to "ciculate among the troops" however, it is a very rare event for central office leaders in a school district and the legislators that pass reforms actually set foot in a school much less engage with the teachers who are "on the front lines" in order to learn what the struggles are in today's educational environments.
  •  
    I think while us (teachers) are wanting reformers to take a "walk in our shoes" with what goes on a day-to-day basis, we teachers have to stop and think no matter what we judge, or want to believe, we have no idea what goes on from the time our students leave in the afternoon until the time they come back the next day. This article goes to show that "yes," 80% of a student's learning comes from school, but then there is that 20% that needs to come from the home.
kdamiano

Crisis & Hope: Transforming America 's Urban Schools « NJSACC Afterschool FLASH - 2 views

shared by kdamiano on 16 May 12 - No Cached
    • kdamiano
       
      This is so true, and yet, it is the most overlooked fact. The saying, "The rich get rich, and the poor get poorer" is so prevalent when it comes to gaining education. It seems like the more we try to apply standards and accountability, the more we continue to tell disadvantaged students that we believe their future is failure. 
  • In social terms, many of these young people constitute a dependency class overrepresented in prison populations, welfare rolls, broken households and homeless shelters. At the same time, the vast investment of tax dollars in education with seemingly minimal return strains the nation’s collective purse strings at a time of severe economic dislocation.
    • kdamiano
       
      If we know this, why are we not doing more about this!? Is anyone else baffled by the chaos that continues to ensue and the little "we" do to stop it. There needs to more. There need to be more people willing to fight and be the voice for these students. 
    • kdamiano
       
      Standardized tests only contribute to their demise and downfall. 
  •  
    The article brings up a good point about all the different efforts and fads. While on the one hand it's commendable that a number of initiatives are attempted to improve student learning and students' experiences (and they all likely have various degrees of success), this does beg the question of how much might be TOO much. For instance, if multiple efforts are piloted within a school district, how long is it before there is pressure at other schools to adopt one model that shows promise? If there is struggle with one pilot program, how long does it take before there is pressure to abandon it in favor of another endeavor? There are a variety of questions that can come up, and it can just add to the layers of complications that students and educators face. With the world of standardized testing, deadlines and results-based outcomes, I think there are times that certain initiatives may be hindered simply by the pressures of a certain expectation of immediate results that fail to fully take into account the students and educators properly.
  • ...1 more comment...
  •  
    I can only imagine what it must feel like to take those standardized tests over and over...failing everytime. No wonder students are giving up. Why do we need to put so much stock in standardized tests? Still our government is throwing more and more money into making these tests more technological...is that really going to make a difference?
  •  
    Austin and Jenn- The immediacy for results is true. We are a nation of we want it fast, and we want it now; however, this is not possible nor is it reliable. The need for answers only causes stress and irritability in our school systems. Sadly, the pressure to perform on tests and other assessments negates students overall comprehension and engagement within a class. It also limits a teachers ability to teach. It is complicated. I do not think there is one answer. I don't think there is an easy answer. However, I do think that there needs to be a bigger fight for students. It is my belief that this fight starts with eliminating the presence of instant failure, otherwise known as standardized tests.
  •  
    I have spent many of my research classes studying the effect positive parenting has on education. With all of the fad ideas that have come and gone, reaching parents has been an initiative that has made a significant difference. Now we come to the dilemma. Unfortunately, we can't control what happens to the students away from our care, so how can we replicate the same results? I have no doubt that reformers will continue coming up with new ideas to try.
chuxhold

Preparing Teachers for Urban Settings: Changing Teacher Education by Changing Ourselves - 6 views

  •  
    Article abstract: This article explored "the personal and professional changes experienced by a teacher education faculty who embarked on a joint project relating to urban education. The faculty members committed to write book chapters applying their areas of expertise to the challenge of preparing teachers for urban schools." With a qualitative research design, the results showed a detailed description of the staff's "discoveries, thoughts, doubts, and reflections at three points during the project" The study's results revealed "an evolving perspective on urban education focusing upon understanding the lived experiences of the children" as a means of implementing meaningful education for these urban students.
  • ...2 more comments...
  •  
    Many faculty members felt keenly the responsibility to educate these preservice teachers about the challenges of urban education: - "[We have a] responsibility to meet the needs of the children in urban schools...[My goal is] to steer the initiative home so that we can say that, my goodness, we really are better able now to prepare our students to work in those kind of environments" (RP, 8/12, p. 4). - "I think it's the teacher's professional obligation to find a way to reach whatever children they are working with" (CC, 8/26, p. 2). - "I think preservice teachers need to know the difference between urban school settings and suburban and rural school settings and they need to be prepared for those differences in their teaching...I think most of all the project is helping me gain a better insight into those differences which will affect how I teach my students..." (TG, 11/6, p. 1).
  •  
    The qualitative study found that teachers demonstrated both commitment and excitement. However, these educators were faced with hesitation and confusion, "because of the lack of personal or professional experiences in urban schools, the complexity of the issue, and/or the cohesiveness of the [study's] book"
  •  
    I think what I'm starting to see is that the essence...is not developing recipes, quick fixes and a how-to-do-it book as much as it is to begin to talk about the need for understanding such issues as passion, resilience, compensatory kind of skills...I'm getting more to the point of talking about what a person takes into the environment...So if we try to just give our students a whole lot of tricks saying this will work and that will work I think we're setting them up for failure. So we've got to try to turn some of their attitude into philosophy and understanding of the urban setting. It's more knowledge and attitude than it is a skill. That's a change. That's not the way I was approaching it (ST, 11/6, pp. 1-2).
  •  
    I agree that a lack of experiences in urban schools causes hesitation and confusion. I remember going to a school-wide urban education training when I first started teaching in my district. Having some experience with attending and student teaching in an urban school setting, I was astounded by the lack of knowledge of some of my peers. Most of them thought they would be able to build relationships with the students right away and demand their respect. As our student population changed and we gained experience, we became less hesitant and started brainstorming ways to involve our ever-changing community in order to develop better relationships.
1 - 7 of 7
Showing 20 items per page