Skip to main content

Home/ Sp12T1 Web 2.0 Access Barriers/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by Cindy Rooks

Contents contributed and discussions participated by Cindy Rooks

Cindy Rooks

Surfing into the Future: An Introduction to Web 2.0 - AccessWorld® - March 2008 - 2 views

  • Before you even get to whether the content of these sites is accessible, you need to get past the inaccessible elements of the sign-up process. All the Web 2.0 sites that were reviewed for this article require users to sign up, and all use a method called CAPTCHA (completely automated public Turing test to tell computers and humans apart) to verify that you are a human, not a computer. A CAPTCHA is a small graphic that contains text, numbers, or both. You are asked to type the characters that are displayed into a text field. CAPTCHAs are basically a Web 1.0 technology that is used to prevent automated systems, such as those used by spammers, from signing up for services. Unfortunately, because they are graphic, CAPTCHAs are completely inaccessible. Some CAPTCHAs include an audio alternative, but because of voice-recognition technology, the quality of the audio is poor on purpose. Anyone with less-than-perfect hearing or with auditory-processing problems would find them difficult to use.
    • Cindy Rooks
       
      I also have problems with CAPTCHA and I supposedly do not have a disability
  • RIA accessibility is very much a work in progress, but one thing is clear. It will be extremely difficult to provide any kind of backward compatibility for RIA web sites. Old versions of screen readers simply will not work with the new technology, but neither will old versions of web browsers.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • The average user just does not know anything about the need for accessibility or how to go about making the content more accessible. This situation can be aggravated by the fact that the applications that end-users use to put content on the web site typically do not provide any way to make their content more accessible. For example, MySpace is a social networking site where individuals and organizations can put up content on their personal MySpace pages. Content can include photographs and videos. Even if users are aware of accessibility issues and want to provide accessible content to visitors to their pages, there is no facility to do even something as simple as providing alt-text with photographs.
  • of screen readers simply will not work with the new technology, but neither will old versions
    • Cindy Rooks
       
      so more expense for a person with disabilities, most of whom are living on a very fixed income.
  •  
    This article explains accessibility issues with social network sites such as facebook and myspace. also addresses the use of CAPTCHAs
carmin karasic

REQUIRED DISCUSSION: Increasing Awareness about Web Access Barriers - 60 views

web2.0 sp12accessibility
started by carmin karasic on 19 Jan 12 no follow-up yet
  • Cindy Rooks
     
    The website that Maria bookmarked about Assistive technology for Students with Learning Disabilities gave some great tools that I had not thought of or was not even aware of. I will be checking out some of those tools and the ability to use them with some of my students.

    My article argues with the Article that John posted on the actual helpfulness of the new Accessible Rich Internet Applications (ARIA).

    Sherita and i are on the same page with the idea of those CAPTCHAs which I personally despise. I have a hard time seeing them so how can they expect a disabled person to be able to use them to get access to their site.

    The Article Maria posted on Autism Breaking down the Barriers is one I plan to look into further. I did not realize that there were applications designed specifically for a child with autism. I am going to try some of those sites with some of my students and see if it helps them in any of their accessibility issues.
Cindy Rooks

Untangling the Web Surfing into the future:An intorduction to web 2.0 - 10 views

sp12accessibility web2.0 technology disabilities accessibility impaired assistive screen Readers
started by Cindy Rooks on 28 Jan 12 no follow-up yet
  • Cindy Rooks
     
    This article addressed some accessibility issues I had not thought about. It also addresses that some of the new technologies that are being developed will not fix the issues unless there are protocols and guidelines developed that all web sites must use. there also must be keyboard function alternatives where a mouse would be used.
1 - 3 of 3
Showing 20 items per page