Group items tagged

How are Condition Coverage, Branch Coverage, and Decision Coverage different from one another? To find the differences between these three coverage techniques, check out our article Condition Coverage vs. Branch Coverage vs. Decision Coverage.

Testers, our experts are here to help you get a better insight into Statement Coverage, Branch Coverage and Path Coverage Testing. To get details, check out the following article.

A white box testing type, Statement Coverage, is a metric used in software testing to confirm that each statement in the source code is executed at least once. To gain a deeper insight into it, check out our complete article.

An integral part of SDLC, Code Coverage, which is a white-box testing technique, measures how the code is executed during the process of testing. Moreover, it helps ensure that no line of code or area of the program is left untouched for the testing purpose.

Orthogonal Array Testing is a black-box testing method that allows maximum test coverage, where the number of test cases is less as compared to data. Also abbreviated as OATS, it is a statistical and systematic way of testing that makes provision for the representative depiction of all data combinations.

Traditional Testing and Agile Testing are two important testing techniques used to test the credibility, reliability, quality, functionality, and other important components of the software. Traditional Testing: Offers full coverage of the software. Allows one to detect the maximum number of defects. Agile Testing: Involves rigorous planning, analysis, and testing. Offers effective and efficient risk management.

Automated testing for Salesforce often starts simply - testing basic workflows in a single org with a small team. But as businesses grow, so does the complexity of their testing requirements. What begins as a handful of automated tests can quickly evolve into thousands of interdependent scripts spanning multiple Salesforce orgs, backend systems, and business-critical applications. Add in frequent updates, multiple user personas, and AI-driven automation, and maintaining test coverage at scale becomes a major challenge.

"If you automate a mess, you get an automated mess." (Rod Michael) Virtually all software development projects today contain an element of test automation. If an initiative is not already underway chances are there is one under consideration. The software engineering groups are generally convinced of the benefits - greater test coverage achieved faster being the most apparent.

The spectacular growth of the software industry and globalization has made it easy for software vendors to target the non-English speaking geographies, reach out to a wider audience, and spread their footprint. With wider coverage, software product companies are increasing their chances of capturing a larger market share.

Salesforce, with its highly customizable interface, has traditionally relied on UI-based automation. But UI-based testing alone can be slow, brittle, and challenging to maintain. As Salesforce implementations grow in complexity, testing teams can use API testing as a powerful alternative to enhance testing efficiency and coverage.