c: relevant and legit news article. updated recently r: very relevant and gives an in depth look on how gangs and prison are related a: the grammar is perfect, citations are included a: Reporter who i googled and had a great record p: somewhat bias.

c: relevant and legit news article. updated recently r: very relevant and gives an in depth look on how gangs and prison are related a: the grammar is perfect, citations are included a: Reporter who i googled and had a great record p: somewhat bias.

c: its a university website,page was created by multiple professors. r: published in 2006 but due to the topic its still very relevant and gives an in depth look on gang culture outside of North America. a: all the work is cited and doesn't have grammar mistakes a: it was published in a newspaper P; slightly bias but mostly informative

c: its a university website,page was created by multiple professors. r: published in 2006 but due to the topic its still very relevant and gives an in depth look on gang culture outside of North America. a: all the work is cited and doesn't have grammar mistakes a: it was published in a newspaper P; slightly bias but mostly informative

c: the paper was published in 2002, but due to its subject, its still relevant. the website at first seems a little suspicious but due to its URL having .edu and it being a university website (that I did a quick google search on, i trust its information. r: It explores the culture of gangs and gives a good intro to the topic. Little older than i would like but its still all very relevant. a: PHD mike carlie, a professor at a university. All checks out on google. a: all statements that aren't his have a reference, grammar is perfect. p: its to inform and isn't bias.