Skip to main content

Home/ Social Finance/ Group items tagged fund

Rss Feed Group items tagged

adamspence

Sarona Asset Management commits $3.5 million in new impact investments - 0 views

  • Sarona Asset Management announced today that its Sarona Frontier Markets Fund I LP has committed US$3,500,000 to two private equity funds: US$2,000,000 to the South Asia Clean Energy Fund and US$1,500,000 to the Fanisi Venture Capital Fund.
  •  
    "Sarona Asset Management announced today that its Sarona Frontier Markets Fund I LP has committed US$3,500,000 to two private equity funds: US$2,000,000 to the South Asia Clean Energy Fund and US$1,500,000 to the Fanisi Venture Capital Fund."
adamspence

Charities Aid Foundation launches new social investment fund - 1 views

  •  
    Interest in philanthropy is at an all time high and with many major donors looking for new ways to help charities and achieve the maximum impact with their donations, the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) has today launched a new social investment fund, the CAF Social Impact Fund. Philanthropists can invest their charitable capital in the fund which will provide loans for charities to help them become stronger and expand. Once loans are repaid the funds will be recycled enabling philanthropists to support more charities.
Adam Jagelewski

Ottawa's United Way changes funding process - 0 views

  • United Way Ottawa took a big step toward a major cultural shift in the social sector Wednesday with the announcement of $6 million in funding to local agencies based on an open competition for dollars.In the past the United Way had member agencies, which could usually count on program funding year to year.
  • In the coming year, there will be support for 115 programs at 70 agencies, with 24 of the programs new to the United Way. That leaves about 55 other programs at more than 37 agencies facing funding cuts, although the United Way said every agency received some reduced funding to ease the transition to zero. The transition funding ranges from $1,700 for Autism Ontario's Ottawa Chapter to $46,000 for Citizen Advocacy of Ottawa, which has received United Way support for decades. Other agencies losing program funding include the City for All Women Initiative, Co-operative des ainés francophones (CAFEO), Planned Parenthood Ottawa and Leadership Ottawa.
  • "Donors want to know, what difference is their investment making?" said Michael Allen, president of United Way Ottawa.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • "We received 225 proposals for $18 million in funding, and we had $6 million to hand out this time," said Jeffrey Dale, chair of United Way Ottawa's investment committee. "We knew we had to make hard choices
Tim Draimin

Impact Capital is the New Venture Capital | Entrepreneur the Arts - 1 views

  • Impact Capital is the New Venture Capital
  • By Sir Ronald Cohen
  • Broadly speaking, capitalism does not deal with its social consequences. Even as communities grow richer on average, so the gap between the “haves” and the “have-nots” increases. For example, since the mid-1970s, both the USA and UK have actually become less equal rather than more equal. In the long post-war boom many governments did make significant headway in ameliorating the consequences of social inequality. This can be seen in levels of investment in areas such as health and in critical performance measures such as life expectancy. Nevertheless, governments, despite their best efforts and even in the best of times, have not been able to resolve all social problems.
  • ...14 more annotations...
  • Commentators on one side of the political spectrum attribute this failure to the lack of resources available to the state and to the state’s reluctance or inability to act appropriately. Commentators on the other side attribute government’s shortcomings to the inherent inefficiency of the state itself. The truth is that the political process, which focuses on short-term gains, does not favor long-term, preventative investment of the type required to address major social problems.
  • The social sector, which is also called the voluntary, non-profit or third sector, has done its best, with the support of philanthropic donations and government, to address the social problems that fall through the gaps in government provision.
  • Some argue that the social sector’s problem is that it is significantly under-resourced. Others argue that the insufficiency of resources is in part a consequence of the sector’s reliance upon philanthropy — from foundations and from individual donors — that can be unpredictable. Both critiques may be correct: the social sector has a problem in accessing capital, often because of a lack of a reliable revenue stream, and, as a consequence, it is inefficient, especially in respect of building sustainable organizations, securing funding and utilizing assets to support large-scale activity.
  • Recent moves to make the social sector more efficient, by focusing on improvements to the management of both the donors and the recipients of grants, are an important development. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation applies rigorous criteria to the assessment of the performance of organizations in receipt of its grant funding. Michael Dell’s philanthropic work is similarly rigorous. Their goal, according to Harvard professors Robert Kaplan and Allen Grossman, is, essentially, “to find and fund the Microsofts and Dells of the non-profit sector.”
  • In fact, such moves are more necessary than ever, as deficit-ridden governments seek to pass greater responsibility onto the shoulders of the social sector. An example of this is the UK Coalition Government’s strategic objective to foster the “Big Society.” In essence, the Big Society agenda seeks to pass a significant portion of responsibility for social cohesion back to the community via the voluntary sector, and, at the same time, to confer greater legitimacy upon such community work and to provide incentives and support for it. However, the social sector as currently constituted is unlikely to be able to address the scale of the social need; or, to put it another way, to meet the scale of the social challenge.
  • This is where social entrepreneurs come in. We know that entrepreneurs create jobs and foster innovation. In that sense, they already make a substantial social contribution. But entrepreneurs have special qualities that could make a significant beneficial impact were they to be applied to social issues. The entrepreneurial mindset embraces leadership, vision, the ability to attract talented people, drive, focus, perseverance, self-confidence, optimism, competitiveness and ambition. To these one might add an appetite for taking informed risks, an unwavering focus on results, a willingness to take responsibility, a grounded sense of realism, astute judgment of opportunities and people, and a fascination with the field of enterprise in question. The engagement of entrepreneurs in the social sector, bringing in their wake high expectations of performance, accountability and innovation, could lead to significantly increased social impact.
  • Could the social sector be transformed to allow the emergence of entrepreneurs from within its own ranks and attract social entrepreneurs and capital on a large scale? The answer is yes, provided that we can create an effective system to support social entrepreneurship, by linking the social sector to the capital markets and introducing new financial instruments that enable entrepreneurs to make beneficial social impact while also making adequate financial returns for investors. Given these conditions, it is possible that social entrepreneurs and impact investors will significantly fill the gap between social need and current government and social-sector provision. Indeed, were social enterprise to achieve significant scale, it would transform the social sector and lead to a new contract between government, the capital markets and citizens.
  • In this process, charitable, institutional and private investors, attracted by the combination of social as well as financial returns, would bring into being a new asset class: impact investment. In a recent report, JP Morgan came to the conclusion that impact investments already constitute an emerging asset class: “In a world where government resources and charitable donations are insufficient to address the world’s social problems, impact investing offers a new alternative for channeling large-scale private capital for social benefit. With increasing numbers of investors rejecting the notion that they face a binary choice between investing for maximum risk-adjusted returns or donating for social purpose, the impact investment market is now at a significant turning point as it enters the mainstream… We argue that impact investments are emerging as an alternative asset class.”
  • This new asset class requires a specific set of investment and risk-management skills; it demands organizational structures to accommodate these skills; it must be serviced by industry organizations and associations; and it must encourage the development of standardized metrics, benchmarks and even ratings. As has been observed by the impact-investment firm Bridges Ventures in the UK, such an asset class should provide welcome diversification for capital markets: at times of economic stress, price-sensitive business models appropriate to lower income neighborhoods can prove more resilient and also find wider applications in the mainstream market as both margins and consumer spending power are squeezed.
  • Not surprisingly, politicians as well as academics, entrepreneurs and investors are paying increasingly close attention to these developments. In the US and in the UK, and now also in Canada and Australia, steps are being taken to provide social entrepreneurs with access to the same kinds of resources as business entrepreneurs. The USA’s Social Innovation Fund ($173 million) and the Investing in Innovation Fund ($644 million) are notable examples; as is the proposed creation of the UK’s Big Society Bank. In Canada, the Federal Government recently received the report of the Canadian Task Force on Social Finance, whose recommendations include requiring public and private foundations to devote a proportion of their funds to mission-related investments; clarifying fiduciary obligations so that pension funds and others can invest in social programs; introducing new financial instruments for social enterprise; and marshalling government support for social enterprise, directly through seed investment and business support services and indirectly through fiscal engineering.
  • How likely is it that such steps will succeed? In answering this question, we would do well to consider that the global economy faced a similar moment of challenge and opportunity in the 1970s and 1980s, when many of the most familiar names in the post-war corporate world started to decline and shed jobs, among them General Motors, American Motors, Courtaulds, ICI, Smith Corona, Olivetti, US Steel, Bethlehem Steel, Kodak and International Harvester. The question then was: what would take their place?
  • What took their place was a new wave of business enterprise helped by venture investing, mostly focused on high-tech industries. This is the wave that brought us Intel, Cisco, Oracle, Microsoft, Apple, Sun Microsystems and Genentech. The hi-tech wave has since swept the world, taking us into the embrace of Google, Wikipedia and Facebook and ushering in a communications and information revolution based on global access to information from multiple sources. It has thereby profoundly changed global culture.
  • Just as hi-tech business enterprise and venture capital, working in tandem, have attracted increasing numbers of talented risk-takers since the 1970s, so social enterprise and impact investment are now attracting a new generation of talented and committed innovators seeking to combine new approaches to achieving social returns. Social enterprise and impact investing, in short, look like the wave of the future.
  • About Sir Ronald Cohen Sir Ronald Cohen is chairman of Bridges Ventures and The Portland Trust. He chaired the UK’s Social Investment Task Force and the Commission on Unclaimed Assets and he is a founder-director of Social Finance. Until 2005, he was executive chairman of Apax Partners Worldwide LLP, which he co-founded in 1972.
  •  
    Sir Ronald Cohen's overview of the emergence of the impact investing space, including references to Canada the Canadian Task Force on Social Finance.
Tim Draimin

The Conservative Party | News | News | Charities benefit from Big Society Fund - 0 views

  • Charities benefit from Big Society Fund
  • Francis Maude, Minister for the Cabinet Office, and Nick Hurd, Minister for Civil Society, have announced that charities across England have been awarded a total of £77.5million in the third wave of payouts from the £107million Transition Fund to help them prepare for new Big Society opportunities.
  • Around 900 charities have received support from the Transition Fund so far.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Charities like the Beat Bullying, which has helped countless children and young people deeply affected by bullying, and ICENI, which treats and tackles addiction in Ipswich and Suffolk, are using the money to modernise. This will help them make the most of more opportunities for them to deliver public services and new sources of finance, such as capital investment from the Big Society Bank, which the Government is developing as part of its drive to support a Big Society.
  • Francis Maude said: "We all want a bigger, stronger society where people get involved and do their bit.
  • "This isn't new - there are already loads of people right across Britain taking responsibility and making our communities better places to live.
  • "What is new is that this Government is making it easier for people to do more: giving people power to improve public service, putting communities in control, and supporting people to help others."
  • Nick Hurd said: "The Transition Fund is part of a much wider package of support for charities and voluntary groups and social enterprises. "The Cabinet Office will invest around £470million in direct support over four years. "We are opening up new opportunities for charities to deliver public services, cutting red tape and developing new sources of finance such as the Big Society Bank." The Transition Fund was announced in the Spending Review, October 2010. The Fund closed to applications on 21 January 2011. £94million has now been committed and final awards will be announced later this summer.
  •  
    Report from Conservative Party News (UK) on the transition fund for charities, part of a wider package of support over 4 years totally 470 million pounds sterling.
Tim Draimin

Government gives out £81m to charities from Transition Fund - Civil Society -... - 0 views

  • Government gives out £81m to charities from Transition Fund
  • Finance | Vibeka Mair | 13 Jun 2011
  • The government has paid out a further £81m from the £107m Transition Fund to around 727 charities which are most vulnerable to reductions in public spending.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • To date £97.5m has been committed from the Transition Fund to more than 900 charities. Final awards will be announced later this summer.
  • The Transition Fund aims to help charities make the most of more opportunities to deliver public services and new sources of finance, such as capital investment from the Big Society Bank
  • Nick Hurd, minister for civil society, said: “All the charities receiving transition funds have a plan to overcome current challenges and emerge stronger. We recognise the hugely important contribution charities make to our society and we are committed to supporting them."
  •  
    "The Transition Fund aims to help charities make the most of more opportunities to deliver public services and new sources of finance, such as capital investment from the Big Society Bank."
Tim Draimin

Showing social investment works - Civil Society - Finance - In-depth - Interviews - pro... - 0 views

  • Showing social investment works
  • Finance | Vibeka Mair | 20 Jun 201
  • In August, Jonathan Lewis leaves social lender Social Investment Business to become chief executive of NHS spin-out Bromley Healthcare. Vibeka Mair interviews Lewis on his time with the UK’s largest social investor.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • It’s getting off to a slow start, but the Big Society Bank looks set to mark a new dawn for social investment, bringing a potential £400m into the market. But before this, in 2007, a new-style social lender entered the market with a relatively modest £15m, before growing into one of the largest social investors in the country.
  • The organisation started off as the Adventure Capital Fund, which then became known as Futurebuilders – generating the organisation's biggest fund to date, finally settling on Social Investment Business – a clear catchall to describe the organisation, and a nod to its ambitions to run the Big Society Bank, a concept known as the social investment wholesale bank under the Labour government.
  • Despite its positive effect in financing the charity world, some have criticised it for growing so large so quickly – it has managed a number of funds on behalf of the government and is worth around £400m. Lewis makes no apology:
  • “With Futurebuilders (the £215m fund managed by Social Investment Business on behalf of the Office for Civil Society) we were supposed to help charities win something like 300 contracts. In fact they won over 800, which shows that if you give them a bit of appropriate help they can win lots of contracts by providing innovative and transformative services.”
  • Lewis is also proud that the write-off rate of loans with Futurebuilders was so low, especially since it funds organisations which can’t access traditional finance.
  • “Through Futurebuilders, we lent £120m to organisations which couldn’t get bank finance, and the culminative write-off rate on that money over six years is less than 4 per cent. I’m extremely proud of this fact.”
  • Its outgoing and first chief executive, Jonathan Lewis, says he is most proud that Social Investment Business has shown that social investment works:
  • “Though it was slightly unpopular to grow this quickly, I think creating a large social investor moves the market on a little bit, and the market is going to be moved on again by the Big Society Bank.”
  • Lewis’ time at Social Investment Business could be viewed as the frontier of social investment. His new role follows a similar pattern. Lewis leaves to head the staff-run NHS social enterprise spin-off Bromley Healthcare, one of many public service providers deciding to become a mutual under minister for the Cabinet Office Francis Maude’s new "right to provide" agenda. Maude is leading a drive to support employees of public services to set up mutuals.  Bromley Healthcare is a staff-run healthcare provider organisation rather than a commissioning one. Lewis joins it as chief executive in August.
  •  
    Retrospective observations on the role of Futurebuilders, the 215 million pound fund run by Social Investment Business on behalf of the Office for Civil Society
Joanna Reynolds

Impact investing: Happy returns | The Economist - 0 views

  • Leapfrog’s investments
  • Not everyone is convinced that impact investing is a true asset class. “Impact investing touches every asset class,” says Ron Cordes, who made a fortune in traditional finance before co-founding Impact Assets, an intermediary focused on building up the sector. “But many people think hedge funds are an asset class, and by that yardstick impact investment is, too.”
  • There is already demand from a broad mix of investors, as Leapfrog illustrates. Its backers range from philanthropists such as George Soros, a hedge-fund manager, and Pierre Omidyar, the founder of eBay, to banks, reinsurers and pension funds.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • In June Impact Assets published a list of the top 50 impact investors, ranging from Blue Orchard, which has invested around $1 billion in microcredit, to IGNIA, which is investing its first $100m fund in growing small businesses in Latin America and is about to start raising a second fund.
  • Other hurdles must be overcome if impact investing is to soar. New regulations are needed (to clarify, for instance, whether pension funds can invest with an explicitly social purpose). More people need to be tempted out of mainstream finance. Better metrics for social impact are essential.
Nabeel Ahmed

CC14 Investment of Charitable Funds: Basic Principles - 0 views

  • Charities and Investment Matters: A guide for trustees (CC14)
  • This guidance is about how to make decisions about investing charity funds. All charities are able to invest, and investments can be a major source of funding for them. However, investing also exposes charities to risks which, if not properly managed, can affect not just the charity itself but the public's trust and confidence in the sector more generally. Because of this, it's important that charities manage these risks and operate within the law. As the regulator of charities in England and Wales, we have produced this guidance to support charities and their trustees in confidently making decisions about investments that comply with their duties.
  • A3 What does this guidance cover? This guidance sets out the legal and good practice framework for the investment of charity funds. It covers: financial investment - investing to produce the best financial return within the level of risk considered by the charity to be acceptable the key steps in making financial investments programme related investment - using assets to directly further the charity's aims while potentially also generating a financial return the key steps in making a programme related investment mixed motive investments - investing to both further a charity's aims and generate a financial return.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • A4 Who is this guidance for? Trustees and those who make decisions on behalf of trustees about a charity's investments and assets should use this guidance as a tool to help them make confident, informed decisions and publicly to report on those decisions.
Tim Draimin

Proposal weds investors and charities - 0 views

  • Imagine if charities had to operate like companies in the private sector. They would need to raise capital from investors in order to carry out their work and investors would get returns if the charity produced results. But this isn’t just a hypothetical scenario – it’s exactly what is being proposed under a new type of philanthropy called ‘social impact bonds’ or ‘pay-for-success bonds’.
  • One is the tendency to help beneficiaries most likely to achieve a positive outcome. Sticking with the prison reform example, charities might try to maximize their outcomes by helping mostly or only those prisoners who will be the easiest to integrate back into society. The prisoners with the more complex and time-intensive reform challenges will not be helped because the risk to investors is too high. Charities that work with the hardest to help will continue to struggle to find funders who will support their costly and long-term work – important as it may be.
  • This pay-for-success model certainly sounds promising, but there are some potential issues that may emerge when profit-focused investments are combined with socially-focused charitable activities.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Another potential barrier to this pay-for-success approach is that the funding to pay investors their return ultimately comes from government. These investments are not necessarily creating a new pot of money. Rather, they’re transferring the risk from taxpayers to private investors. In the past, government funding for social projects would pay for everything upfront, regardless of outcomes. Now, under impact bonds, they will only pay for results from non-profits after they have been achieved. So, are pay-for-success bonds a truly revolutionary way to fund charitable work, or is it just government funding repackaged?
  • espite potential shortcomings, these pay-for-success bonds are forcing people to rethink how the not-for-profit sector operates and funds its work. Applying private sector principles to charities is not necessarily a bad thing – many non-profits can benefit from working more efficiently and measuring their results. But whether these new bonds are the mechanism that will transform philanthropy remains to be seen.
Tim Draimin

Honor the Stanford mission, be of value to society, urges Reich - 1 views

  • Honor the Stanford mission, be of value to society, urges Reich
  • Rob Reich, associate professor of political science, exhorted members of the Class of 2011 to use their education not just for personal gain but also to better society.
  • Reich is an associate professor of political science, faculty director of the Program in Ethics in Society and co-director of the university's Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • The new social economy Segueing into his lecture, "The Promise and Peril of the New Social Economy," Reich promptly informed his audience that his talk would not be about Facebook or Twitter or other social media.
  • "Same name, different guy," he said. "For the political junkies among you, you will know what I mean when I say that while I am lesser in stature, I am greater in height."
  • After a short performance by the a cappella group Everyday People, some welcoming remarks by Howard Wolf, president of the alumni association, and an introduction by Provost John Etchemendy, Reich stepped to the lectern. He prefaced his lecture by offering his apology to anyone who thought they were going to hear a talk by "the other" Robert Reich, the diminutive Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration.
  • "The exciting fact about the world that you graduates are about to enter is that there are many novel and innovative ways for people to do good." Rattling off some of the buzzwords associated with the new approaches, such as "impact investing," "venture capitalism" and "social return on investment," Reich acknowledged the enormous innovation and ferment that has been taking place. "This innovation brings along with it great promise," he said, "but also, I hope to show you, some real peril." Historically, he said, a flourishing democratic society is composed of three distinct sectors: the business or for-profit sector; the government or public sector; and the social or nonprofit and philanthropic sector, this last constituting the social economy.
  • "By 'new social economy,' I mean the broad new landscape of organizations that seek to produce social benefits," he said.
  • Blurring the lines But innovations of the past 20 years have broadened the social economy far beyond the world of nonprofit organizations and foundations, and the new social economy is full of hybrid organizations and philosophies.
  • In the for-profit sector there have been innovations such as "corporate social responsibility," in which corporations assume responsibility for the social impact of their actions.
  • And there is socially responsible investing, in which investment funds avoid industries embroiled in moral controversy, such as tobacco companies, or purposely invest in companies that produce social returns. Such funds barely existed 15 years ago, but now constitute more than 10 percent of professionally managed investment funds. There are nonprofit organizations that seek to create operations that earn revenue in addition to accepting donations, and "philanthrocapitalism," as The Economist dubbed it, in which philanthropists purposely employ business strategies in their grant-making efforts.
  • Government also acting
  • Even government is getting into the act, Reich said, with the creation of the White House Office of Social Innovation, which seeks to create new types of partnerships between government and the private sector, and between government and the public sector. The "Investing in Innovation Fund" of the Department of Education involved 12 foundations, including the Gates and Hewlett foundations, which contributed $500 million to the department to unlock $650 million in federal funds. "Now there's a genuinely novel idea," Reich said. "Foundations making grants to the federal government." Because of this blurring of boundaries between the traditional three sectors, the new social economy offers today's graduates a host of choices in "doing good." "If you aim to do good and pursue a social cause, you can be sector agnostic: It doesn't matter what sector – public, private, civil society – one enters," he said. "That is an amazing new world and quite possibly a brave new world."
  • Will it work? But innovation can also be perilous, as there is no guarantee that all innovations lead to positive social change, Reich pointed out. Hybrid organizations like social enterprises might seem great in theory, but in practice they must cope with a deep tension between the profit impulse and the social mission impulse. "Will profit overwhelm principle?" he asked. Reich said the 20th-century regulatory framework governing the old three-sector society will eventually prove inadequate for the cross-sector collaborations that are increasingly popular in the 21st. So, he queried, what does this brave new social economy mean for those about to graduate from Stanford? Citing the purpose of the university as set forth by Jane and Leland Stanford, "to promote the public welfare by exercising an influence in behalf of humanity and civilization," Reich called it "a beautiful, honorable and worthy mission." "As you commence the next stages of your life, remember this: Your education here has not been frivolous," Reich said. "It has qualified you for personal success, yes. But – not to put too much pressure on you – we adults are counting on you to solve the global financial crisis, to figure out the war on terror and to come up with the governance structure of the new social economy."
  •  
    Rob Reich, associate professor of political science, exhorted members of the Class of 2011 to use their education not just for personal gain but also to better society.
  •  
    Commencement address on the expanding
Joanna Reynolds

The Fund Library :: ETFs :: AGF's Acuity SRI funds carefully assess environmental risks... - 0 views

  •  
    This site will be useful for us to learn about how Fund data is developed and shared in the industry.  
Annie Malhotra

Reclaiming the Investment Dialogue for Social Entrepreneurs - Social Edge - 0 views

  • Supply and demand. A simple framework for market analysis that can reveal complex insights.  The social capital market is no exception to that rule. Recent years have seen an explosion of funds flowing into this space, increasing the supply of growth capital available to social entrepreneurs to new levels. However, within this same market, the number of social businesses ready and able to demand these funds has not kept pace. While fund creation continues at rapid speeds, the market reality for most fund managers continues to be an insufficient pipeline of investable projects in which to place this capital.  Even a basic course in economics suggests who should hold the bargaining power here – those demanding the social capital, a.k.a. the social entrepreneur.  But if this should be the case, why have the conversations on social investment been overwhelmingly dominated by investors? They dictate investment terms, develop a common investor language, create burdensome due diligence requirements for investees, force “cookie-cutter” financing instruments on complex business models, and demand an endless list of documentation. The social entrepreneur is left catering to their wishes, often sacrificing their main reason for existing in the first place – creating social impact.
Tim Draimin

Big Society Bank Bank Delayed - 1 views

  • Big Society Bank delayed until 2012
  • Big Lottery has had to step in and start funding some social enterprise projects as Big Society Bank will not be open for business in July
  • In a twist of irony for a government that has set itself targets for ‘thickets’ of bureaucracy, dealings with European regulators over the state aid rules, along with ongoing talks with British high-street banks have pushed back the launch of Big Society Bank. This emerged from remarks made by Sir Ron Cohen, the Cabinet Office’s adviser on funding social projects, at the Public Administration Committee’s (PASC) meeting, ‘Smaller government, bigger society’ which met on Tuesday, 14 June 2011.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • The full transcript of the proceedings can be viewed online and provides a very helpful update on all the key issues surrounding Social Impact Bonds and Big Society Bank.[i]
  • Background to Big Society bank
  • Stephen Bubb’s comprehensive article ‘A new financial landscape’ in Caritas, March 2011  sets out the gestation and remit of what has been a long-awaited social investment bank and a useful summary can be found in the chapter 5 (page 37) of the Cabinet Office’s report, Growing the Social Investment market: A vision and strategy.[ii]
  • State aid legislation and other hold-ups
  • Cohen told the PASC that the Big Society Bank’s opening target of July 2011 would be missed “by a matter of some months” because of delays from the Cabinet Office in steering it through the complexities of EU state aid in financing public service provision legislation (in place to prevent the warping of the rules of competition between member countries). He said he encountered exactly the same thing with Bridges Ventures, his own organisation, and that he was confident that not only would the necessary permissions be given but that “the EU will turn out to be a big proponent of social investment.”
  • He also explained that the other complications was that the government had no agreement with UK banks the £200m of funding they had agreed on as part of the Project Merlin settlement, and that these details were still being sorted out.
  • In the meantime and agreement has been signed with Big Lottery so that it could fund some of the projects that Big Society Bank would eventually take over.
  • Long-term delivery  
  • When he was reminded that nine out of ten new enterprises end in failure, he countered with the response that everything ‘involves a risk’ and that failure in social enterprise was a form of philanthropy anyway. However, Cohen is a seasoned venture financier who does not set out to lose money. He added: “we see our objective as getting the social sector going. We have to preserve the value of our capital in doing it but we don’t have to maximise its value – we would like to be proactive.”   Cohen was confident of the Social Enterprise Bank’s long-term viability, explaining that real success could take ten or 20 years to materialise with cash positivity projected in seven years’ time.
  •  
    Update on the status of the Big Society Bank, reviewing challenges it faces leading to Big Lottery stepping in...
Tim Draimin

Social Innovation Europe Initiative Launched in Brussels :: wbc-inco.net - 0 views

  • On March 16 and 17, 2011, Social Innovation Europe was launched in Brussels. Funded by the European Commission, Social Innovation Europe will create a dynamic, entrepreneurial and innovative new Europe. The time has come for Europe to embrace the broad concept of innovation and set an example globally. By 2014, Social Innovation Europe will have become the meeting place - virtual and real - for social innovators, entrepreneurs, non-profit organisations, policy makers and anyone else who is inspired by social innovation in Europe. Through a series of gatherings, and a new online resource, Social Innovation Europe will: connect projects and people who can share experiences and learn from each other; develop an easily accessible resource bank - so you can find about other projects, organisations and ways of working; develop a resource bank of up to date policies at local and national levels and provide information on funding opportunities; facilitate new relationships between civil society, governments, public sector institutions and relevant private sector bodies develop concrete recommendations in financing and in upscaling/mainstreaming of social innovation in Europe Download the conference report.
  •  
    Social Innovation goes mainstream in Europe as European Union launches SI Europe March 2011 conference with presentations by Geoff Mulgan, Vickie Cammack of Tyze, many others including José Manuel Durão Barroso, President of the European Commission. His speech included: SPEECH/11/190 José Manuel Durão Barroso President of the European Commission Europe leading social innovation Social Innovation Europe initiative Brussels, 17 March 2011 Ladies and Gentlemen, It is a pleasure to be here and see all of you around this very important issue - how to pursue our dialogue on social innovation. I would like to thank Geoff Mulgan and Diogo Vasconcelos for their kind invitation and also to congratulate them together with Louise Pulford for having won the call to set up the pilot initiative "Social innovation Europe". I also would like to thank DG enterprise for having organised this launch event today. As you know the Commission is fully involved. Lázsló Andor was with you yesterday. Máire Geoghegan-Quinn will be with you today, so this idea of innovation is indeed a major issue for the Commission I am proud to lead. Europe has a long and strong tradition of social innovation: from the workplace to hospices, and from the cooperative movement to microfinance. We have always been a continent of creative social entrepreneurs who have designed systems to enhance education, health, social inclusion and the well-being of citizens. By nature social innovation is an ever-evolving field to keep pace with fast-changing challenges in society. But what concretely do we mean by social innovation? I think it is important to recognise that this concept is not yet fully accepted in the political debate. I think social innovation is about meeting the unmet social needs and improving social outcomes. It is about tapping into the creativity of charities, associations and social entrepreneurs to find new ways of meeting pressing social needs, which are not adequately met
adamspence

Socially responsible investments yield dividends - The National - 0 views

  • Investing money to make a difference goes by several names, with "ethical", "impact", "green" and "socially responsible" among the industry favourites. But the definition is generally the same: returns are usually sacrificed in the name of doing good. This view is set to change, according to a report titled Impact Investing in Emerging Markets, by the consultancy Responsible Research.
  • The report has found impact investing in emerging markets is becoming more attractive to fund managers, private equity companies and retail investors worldwide, because the returns are now more compelling. The research cites a survey by the Global Impact Investing Network which found investors anticipate a return of between 20 and 24 per cent this year on their interests in impact companies working in emerging markets.
  • WillowTree is raising cash from investors around the world and has nearly reached its target of US$80 million (Dh293.8m).

    It will use these funds to take equity stakes in companies involved in education, health, food, poverty alleviation and community development, investing between $500,000 and $10m in each project.

    The private equity fund is focusing on the Middle East, North Africa and south Asia.

Tim Draimin

Hamilton: Green, RRSP-eligible community bonds coming soon - thestar.com - 0 views

  • Last October a young entrepreneur named Daniel Bida got together with a group of like-minded individuals and approached the management of the Toronto Zoo with an innovative idea.
  • They knew the zoo was interested in building a biogas facility that could turn manure from elephants, giraffes and other animals into renewable electricity and heat. They also knew that after several years of trying the zoo, despite its good intentions, couldn’t make it happen. The project it envisioned was simply too complex and risky for commercial investors.
  • Bida proposed a new approach: build a smaller, more manageable facility and open up investment to the broader community through the issuance of bonds.
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • He was inspired after watching Toronto’s Centre for Social Innovation (CSI) purchase and retrofit a building using $2 million it had raised selling community bonds at $10,000 apiece. The bonds, which could be purchased by anyone, offered a 4 per cent annual rate of return over five years and were RRSP-eligible.
  • If the banks wouldn’t lend the money to a not-for-profit organization like CSI, then individuals who support the organization’s mandate just might. Tapping into CSI’s “social asset” proved a good gamble, as the community was quick to scoop up the bonds.
  • “This told me that the whole community bond thing was for real,” say Bida, convinced he could adapt the approach to support renewable-energy projects.
  • Their approach represents a low-risk investment for people who want to support “green” community projects and make some money, but who don’t want to spend thousands of dollars putting solar PV systems on their own rooftops.
  • Electricity from the plant will be sold into the grid under the province’s feed-in-tariff program, while waste heat could end up being pumped into a nearby greenhouse, potentially used to grow bamboo for the new pandas expected to arrive in 2014.
  • About 70 per cent of the project, or roughly $3.5 million, will be funded through the sale of community bonds that, like the CSI bonds, could be purchased through a self-directed RRSP. ZooShare hopes to offer bonds with a seven-year term and up to a 7 per cent annual return on investment.
  • For existing zoo members and those living within one kilometre of the zoo, the bonds will be sold in $500 units. Everyone else can pick them up for $5,000 each, unless they want to purchase a zoo membership. “We’re hoping this will sell more memberships for the zoo as a result,” says Bida, whose company ReGenerate Biogas is managing the project.
  • ZooShare is just one of several co-op ventures going the community bond route to raise capital for renewably-energy projects. Others include Options for Green Energy, SolarShare and WaterShare.
  • The zoo executives liked the idea and several months later Bida helped form the ZooShare Biogas Co-operative, a not-for-profit community co-op that plans to build a 500-kilowatt biogas plant at the zoo for about $5 million
  • t also offers a way for those without property, such as renters, or without the proper land or rooftop exposure, to participate in the feed-in-tariff program. Community bonds, in essence, make the FIT program more inclusive and get the broader population directly invested in their energy future, be it solar, wind, biogas or hydro.
  • “This idea of massive public involvement in the ownership and economic benefit of these projects is what we’ve all been working towards for the past 15 years,” says Deb Doncaster, executive director of the Community Power Fund, which supports community co-op projects with grants and low-interest bridge financing.
  • “All it will take is for one or two of these projects to be successful and the approach will take off.” Social media will certainly play a role. Facebook, Twitter and other social networking applications make it much easier for community co-ops to reach out to supporters. Spreading the word to the right people has become almost effortless. Still, a couple of barriers need to be overcome before you or I can purchase such bonds. For one, RRSP-eligible community bonds must be approved and registered with the Financial Services Commission of Ontario before they can be sold. Some say the commission is dragging it feet. SolarShare, for example, wants to issue community bonds in $1,000 increments that would offer a 5-per-cent return annually and be redeemable after five years. The funds raised from the bond issue will support construction of solar PV projects across southern Ontario. It’s all new territory for the financial services commission, which has proved a major bottleneck. “They’re tight on the resources needed to deal with this new landscape,” says Matt Zipchen, who as project manager for the Toronto Renewable Energy Co-operative is overseeing development of SolarShare. Zipchen says another roadblock is the banks. “These community bonds may be RRSP-eligible, but whether or not your bank will let you hold them is another question,” he says. “Banks are finicky about them. We’re just starting the process with the banks to see which ones will hold these bonds and which won’t.” It will all get sorted out over time. Indeed, all it will likely take is for one big bank to break from the pack before others start to follow. If demand for community bonds is high enough, that will likely happen. That’s what SolarShare, ZooShare and others are counting on. Tyler Hamilton, author of the upcoming book Mad Like Tesla, writes weekly about green energy and clean technologies. Reach him at tyler@cleanbreak.ca
  •  
    Toronto Star shows how the idea of community bonds is taking off!
Peter Deitz

Wanted: Investment Champions for the Canada Impact Investment Fund | Blog | Social Finance - 2 views

  • The Social Investment Organization (SIO) recently released Impact Investing in Canada: A survey of assets. The study found $4.45 billion in impact investing assets in Canada, a dramatic increase from $1.4 billion only two years earlier. This includes community loan funds, credit union community investments, international impact investments, aboriginal financial institutions, Community Futures Development Corporations (CFDC) and investments through development capital and solidarity finance institutions in Quebec.
Peter Deitz

Coming in from the 'Dark Side' - Down to Business Blog - 0 views

  • The lazy yet dominant financial market preconception of social entrepreneurs is of fluffy tree-hugging do-gooders who couldn't cut it in the 'real world'. Indeed, my peers from business school and the financial markets in the City still think I am simply going through a 'charity phase' and will eventually return to the fold. But I'm not going to. I have been lucky to come across a pioneering market place and I'm signed up for the duration. Social enterprise is about sustainability, financial viability, commercial solutions to social needs. It is not about inefficiencies of investment, or the black hole of grant donations. The guys at SOCAP in San Francisco name this space the intersection of money and meaning. What are we at UnLtd doing to help increase the awareness of this intersection? For a start we've just launched the Big Venture Challenge to accelerate the entry of business angels into the social investment market place. We are looking to find 25 of the most ambitious social entrepreneurs with scalable ventures - and then 'de-risk' any investments by providing matched funding and some high calibre support from ourselves, Accenture, Deutsche Bank, Coutts, Thomson Reuters, Hogan Lovells and others.
  • This is certainly an international phenomenon, albeit operating at different paces throughout the world, but with clear exporting/importing of talent, knowledge and experience: The UK market place has been swamped with interest in how to replicate our own work with both government-led as well as private delegations from Canada, Vietnam, China, Thailand, Japan, Australia and Continental Europe just in recent months. UnLtd ourselves now have three sister organisations, which operate different business models, but with the same vision of helping social entrepreneurs in India, Thailand and South Africa, with many more in the offing. Similarly, the UK's School for Social Entrepreneurs has expanded to Australia and has many more international partners queuing up. Volans is now operating out of London and Singapore.There is the Global Impact Investing Network and the Global Impact Investing Reporting Standards coming out of the US but with international intentions (it's in the names!)There are (formative) social stock exchanges/trading/donation platforms in the US, Singapore, Italy, Brazil, UK, South Africa, KenyaThere is a well established European Venture Philanthropy Association, with a sister organisation opening in SingaporeWe have SOCAP Europe for the first time bringing a US conference to The NetherlandsThere are also a glut of crowd-funding mechanisms evolving to avoid traditional financial machinery, harnessing the Facebook generation: Kiva, MyC4, CrowdCube, Profunders, Buzzbnk, Ethex, Markets for Good.
Peter Deitz

An Alternative to the Social Impact Bond? - 1 views

  • The human capital performance bond proposal differs from the more familiar social impact bond in three important ways: It is truly a bond.  The social impact bonds -- as used in the UK, explored by the Rockefeller Foundation and Nonprofit Finance Fund in the U.S., and profiled here on SocialFinance.ca -- are really equity investments where the investor’s capital is at risk. Consequently, rates of return can run as high as 14%. Not the case in Minnesota. Rather, investors are essentially guaranteed their money back and the rate of return is expected to be around 4%. The anticipated upside of this model is that a lower required rate of return means more organizations will be able to demonstrate economic value that beats that rate and thus allows them to compete for these new funds. The payment timeline is different. In the social impact bond model, organizations receive the cash upfront and must hit pre-determined benchmarks in order for investors to get their money back. With human capital performance bonds, the organizations (mostly nonprofits) carry most of the risk and are only paid if and when they achieve their goal. They would need to secure PRIs or patient capital to meet their interim cash flow needs. The incentives are different. Social impact bonds depend on investors engaging in a due diligence process to evaluate the likely effectiveness of particular social interventions. The model thus uses investors to create the market forces that purportedly will enhance the efficiency of resource flows. The human capital performance bond proposal, in contrast, does not give investors that role.  An intermediary (details yet to be worked out) would fill this gap.
1 - 20 of 34 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page