Skip to main content

Home/ Social Finance/ Group items tagged bonds

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Tim Draimin

Hamilton: Green, RRSP-eligible community bonds coming soon - thestar.com - 0 views

  • Last October a young entrepreneur named Daniel Bida got together with a group of like-minded individuals and approached the management of the Toronto Zoo with an innovative idea.
  • They knew the zoo was interested in building a biogas facility that could turn manure from elephants, giraffes and other animals into renewable electricity and heat. They also knew that after several years of trying the zoo, despite its good intentions, couldn’t make it happen. The project it envisioned was simply too complex and risky for commercial investors.
  • Bida proposed a new approach: build a smaller, more manageable facility and open up investment to the broader community through the issuance of bonds.
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • He was inspired after watching Toronto’s Centre for Social Innovation (CSI) purchase and retrofit a building using $2 million it had raised selling community bonds at $10,000 apiece. The bonds, which could be purchased by anyone, offered a 4 per cent annual rate of return over five years and were RRSP-eligible.
  • If the banks wouldn’t lend the money to a not-for-profit organization like CSI, then individuals who support the organization’s mandate just might. Tapping into CSI’s “social asset” proved a good gamble, as the community was quick to scoop up the bonds.
  • “This told me that the whole community bond thing was for real,” say Bida, convinced he could adapt the approach to support renewable-energy projects.
  • Their approach represents a low-risk investment for people who want to support “green” community projects and make some money, but who don’t want to spend thousands of dollars putting solar PV systems on their own rooftops.
  • Electricity from the plant will be sold into the grid under the province’s feed-in-tariff program, while waste heat could end up being pumped into a nearby greenhouse, potentially used to grow bamboo for the new pandas expected to arrive in 2014.
  • About 70 per cent of the project, or roughly $3.5 million, will be funded through the sale of community bonds that, like the CSI bonds, could be purchased through a self-directed RRSP. ZooShare hopes to offer bonds with a seven-year term and up to a 7 per cent annual return on investment.
  • For existing zoo members and those living within one kilometre of the zoo, the bonds will be sold in $500 units. Everyone else can pick them up for $5,000 each, unless they want to purchase a zoo membership. “We’re hoping this will sell more memberships for the zoo as a result,” says Bida, whose company ReGenerate Biogas is managing the project.
  • ZooShare is just one of several co-op ventures going the community bond route to raise capital for renewably-energy projects. Others include Options for Green Energy, SolarShare and WaterShare.
  • The zoo executives liked the idea and several months later Bida helped form the ZooShare Biogas Co-operative, a not-for-profit community co-op that plans to build a 500-kilowatt biogas plant at the zoo for about $5 million
  • t also offers a way for those without property, such as renters, or without the proper land or rooftop exposure, to participate in the feed-in-tariff program. Community bonds, in essence, make the FIT program more inclusive and get the broader population directly invested in their energy future, be it solar, wind, biogas or hydro.
  • “This idea of massive public involvement in the ownership and economic benefit of these projects is what we’ve all been working towards for the past 15 years,” says Deb Doncaster, executive director of the Community Power Fund, which supports community co-op projects with grants and low-interest bridge financing.
  • “All it will take is for one or two of these projects to be successful and the approach will take off.” Social media will certainly play a role. Facebook, Twitter and other social networking applications make it much easier for community co-ops to reach out to supporters. Spreading the word to the right people has become almost effortless. Still, a couple of barriers need to be overcome before you or I can purchase such bonds. For one, RRSP-eligible community bonds must be approved and registered with the Financial Services Commission of Ontario before they can be sold. Some say the commission is dragging it feet. SolarShare, for example, wants to issue community bonds in $1,000 increments that would offer a 5-per-cent return annually and be redeemable after five years. The funds raised from the bond issue will support construction of solar PV projects across southern Ontario. It’s all new territory for the financial services commission, which has proved a major bottleneck. “They’re tight on the resources needed to deal with this new landscape,” says Matt Zipchen, who as project manager for the Toronto Renewable Energy Co-operative is overseeing development of SolarShare. Zipchen says another roadblock is the banks. “These community bonds may be RRSP-eligible, but whether or not your bank will let you hold them is another question,” he says. “Banks are finicky about them. We’re just starting the process with the banks to see which ones will hold these bonds and which won’t.” It will all get sorted out over time. Indeed, all it will likely take is for one big bank to break from the pack before others start to follow. If demand for community bonds is high enough, that will likely happen. That’s what SolarShare, ZooShare and others are counting on. Tyler Hamilton, author of the upcoming book Mad Like Tesla, writes weekly about green energy and clean technologies. Reach him at tyler@cleanbreak.ca
  •  
    Toronto Star shows how the idea of community bonds is taking off!
Peter Deitz

An Alternative to the Social Impact Bond? - 1 views

  • The human capital performance bond proposal differs from the more familiar social impact bond in three important ways: It is truly a bond.  The social impact bonds -- as used in the UK, explored by the Rockefeller Foundation and Nonprofit Finance Fund in the U.S., and profiled here on SocialFinance.ca -- are really equity investments where the investor’s capital is at risk. Consequently, rates of return can run as high as 14%. Not the case in Minnesota. Rather, investors are essentially guaranteed their money back and the rate of return is expected to be around 4%. The anticipated upside of this model is that a lower required rate of return means more organizations will be able to demonstrate economic value that beats that rate and thus allows them to compete for these new funds. The payment timeline is different. In the social impact bond model, organizations receive the cash upfront and must hit pre-determined benchmarks in order for investors to get their money back. With human capital performance bonds, the organizations (mostly nonprofits) carry most of the risk and are only paid if and when they achieve their goal. They would need to secure PRIs or patient capital to meet their interim cash flow needs. The incentives are different. Social impact bonds depend on investors engaging in a due diligence process to evaluate the likely effectiveness of particular social interventions. The model thus uses investors to create the market forces that purportedly will enhance the efficiency of resource flows. The human capital performance bond proposal, in contrast, does not give investors that role.  An intermediary (details yet to be worked out) would fill this gap.
Peter Deitz

Hamilton: Green, RRSP-eligible community bonds coming soon - thestar.com - 1 views

  • They knew the zoo was interested in building a biogas facility that could turn manure from elephants, giraffes and other animals into renewable electricity and heat. They also knew that after several years of trying the zoo, despite its good intentions, couldn’t make it happen. The project it envisioned was simply too complex and risky for commercial investors. Bida proposed a new approach: build a smaller, more manageable facility and open up investment to the broader community through the issuance of bonds. He was inspired after watching Toronto’s Centre for Social Innovation (CSI) purchase and retrofit a building using $2 million it had raised selling community bonds at $10,000 apiece. The bonds, which could be purchased by anyone, offered a 4 per cent annual rate of return over five years and were RRSP-eligible. If the banks wouldn’t lend the money to a not-for-profit organization like CSI, then individuals who support the organization’s mandate just might. Tapping into CSI’s “social asset” proved a good gamble, as the community was quick to scoop up the bonds.
Tim Draimin

Proposal weds investors and charities - 0 views

  • Imagine if charities had to operate like companies in the private sector. They would need to raise capital from investors in order to carry out their work and investors would get returns if the charity produced results. But this isn’t just a hypothetical scenario – it’s exactly what is being proposed under a new type of philanthropy called ‘social impact bonds’ or ‘pay-for-success bonds’.
  • One is the tendency to help beneficiaries most likely to achieve a positive outcome. Sticking with the prison reform example, charities might try to maximize their outcomes by helping mostly or only those prisoners who will be the easiest to integrate back into society. The prisoners with the more complex and time-intensive reform challenges will not be helped because the risk to investors is too high. Charities that work with the hardest to help will continue to struggle to find funders who will support their costly and long-term work – important as it may be.
  • This pay-for-success model certainly sounds promising, but there are some potential issues that may emerge when profit-focused investments are combined with socially-focused charitable activities.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Another potential barrier to this pay-for-success approach is that the funding to pay investors their return ultimately comes from government. These investments are not necessarily creating a new pot of money. Rather, they’re transferring the risk from taxpayers to private investors. In the past, government funding for social projects would pay for everything upfront, regardless of outcomes. Now, under impact bonds, they will only pay for results from non-profits after they have been achieved. So, are pay-for-success bonds a truly revolutionary way to fund charitable work, or is it just government funding repackaged?
  • espite potential shortcomings, these pay-for-success bonds are forcing people to rethink how the not-for-profit sector operates and funds its work. Applying private sector principles to charities is not necessarily a bad thing – many non-profits can benefit from working more efficiently and measuring their results. But whether these new bonds are the mechanism that will transform philanthropy remains to be seen.
Peter Deitz

There's a long road ahead for social impact bonds - Third Sector blog | Blogs | Third S... - 0 views

  • Will the social impact bond ever attract commercial capital? At least one professional investor believes it eventually will - although he doesn't think it will be quick or easy. The social impact bond was introduced last year as a means of funding early interventions on reducing reoffending, drug use, the number of children in care. The model for the social impact bond is that  investors gives charities money to carry out a long-term payment-by-contract. In exchange, they get any profits the contract generates. In theory, the benefits go to both sides. If the contract works, the investor can make a large return on his money. In the meantime, the charity has a guaranteed income and the freedom to work on its project. However a key question yet to be answered is whether it will really prove attractive to investors.
Tim Draimin

Social Impact Bonds: A New Vehicle to Drive Health Care Reform? : Spencer Healthcare St... - 0 views

  • social impact bonds hold promise, especially in health care. Right now, all eyes are focused on accountable care organizations and the Medicare Shared Savings Program. Probably the biggest obstacle to the program's success is the high cost of forming ACOs, with many organizations dismissing ACOs out of hand due to the lack of available capital. If, however, we inserted another party into the equation - the private investor to whom the government would agree to share cost savings - that investor would become the source of much-needed capital. The chance of success improves dramatically, but at absolutely no cost or increased risk to the government.
  • As proposed, the Medicare Shared Savings Program permits non-providers to hold up to a 25 percent interest in an ACO, thus allowing private investors in on the game. The shared savings payments, if any, still would go to the ACO, and it would be up to the ACO's governing body to determine allocation among participants, including investors. Under the social impact bond model, however, the full payment would go to the investor, creating a greater incentive for the investor to provide necessary capital.
  • Social impact bonds could help drive health reform by lining up incentives and providing necessary resources while reducing government spending care and improving overall health. While the concept is new and relatively untested in health care (but has demonstrated success in other areas), we need to explore whether there are investors who would value an opportunity to drive health care reform. With CMS soliciting comments on the proposed Advanced Payment Initiative - under which CMS would make advances on shared savings payments to ACOs to cover development costs - it makes sense to consider private investors as the source of such funding at the same time.  
Peter Deitz

Jonathan Greenblatt: Social Impact Bonds Bring Social Innovation to the Bay State - 0 views

  • Late last week, Governor Deval Patrick and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts quietly released a Request-for-Information (RFI) on an esoteric new public financing concept. The state cautiously issued its RFI without much fanfare. No trumpets or flags, just an understated press release announcing its interest in the issuance of a Social Impact Bond.
  • Let's be clear: SIBs are not a silver bullet. The very nature of a capped return probably means that SIBs will need to be kick-started by philanthropists and other "impact-first" investors with PRIs before they gain mainstream acceptance. Unlike conventional fiduciaries, philanthropists more easily can square SIBs with their investment priorities. Nonetheless, if this model is proven to work, such experimental philanthropy might be viewed as the venture capital of an era of social innovation.
  • As the field evolves, we should expect to see a flurry of new groups seeking to design such public-private partnerships. Today the field is sparse. Social Finance, a US group launched by Sir Ronald and Mr. Blood, presently appears to be the only significant player in the field. But, many more will come as impact investors, social entrepreneurs and new intermediaries spring up to scale SIBs and launch new innovations.
Peter Deitz

Social impact bonds unlikely to attract tax relief - 0 views

  • Unlike charities community interest companies can't use tax relief to raise capital through social impact bonds, and it may not happen anytime soon, say experts
  • Lodhir offers social impact bonds, developed in partnership with law specialists Clifford Chance – acting on a pro bono basis – to a handful of investors that cost between £2,000 and £3,000 each, from which he hopes to raise enough capital to run the pilot.Lodhir says his organisation's own research suggests the scheme could reduce re-offending rates by up to 60%. And, he says, it could result not only in multiple returns to investors, but also in multiple savings to the taxpayer, through reduced healthcare and re-offending costs and in tax and national insurance contributions from those ex-offenders whose businesses take off."The savings come almost immediately," he says. "But when I contact potential investors, they say, 'oh we only donate to charity'. But building an enterprise culture won't happen with donations – more innovative solutions are needed."John Mulkerrin, chief executive of the CIC Association, thinks the sector is unlikely to win tax reliefs outright from government. "That will come after we've raised £1bn [as a sector] and we offer to turn it into £100bn," he says. "A tax break would be fantastic, but it's not likely to happen because I doubt the sector is mature enough yet."
  • He believes if government is serious about social enterprise, it must make the social investment market just as attractive to investors as charitable donations: "I think CSR is a corporate tax savings initiative. If so, let's include social impact bonds. Why not?"
Nabeel Ahmed

Could SIBs lead to better health outcomes? | Social Finance - 1 views

  • Social Finance is exploring how Social Impact Bonds could be used to improve patients’ health at the same time as reducing expenditure on health services. In this webinar Ben Jupp and Eleanor Stringer will discuss the need for Social Impact Bonds in the health field, and suggest the ways social investment could be used to improve outcomes.
  • 23 June 4.00 - 5.00pm GMT Ben Jupp and Eleanor Stringer, “Could SIBs lead to better health outcomes?
  •  
    Webinar coming up, June 23: SIBs and health outcomes.
Tim Draimin

Mayor rolls out finance options for nonprofits | Crain's New York Business - 0 views

  • Mayor rolls out finance options for nonprofits A new bonding authority would extend low-cost, tax-exempt financing for nonprofits' expansion and facility upgrades.
  • Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has long been considered a patron of nonprofits, took steps on Thursday to unleash the growth potential of that community by announcing the formation of a new entity committed to helping the city's 501(c) organizations gain access to low-cost, tax-exempt financing to expand or upgrade facilities.
  • The New York City Industrial Development Agency, which previously issued tax-exempt bond financing on behalf of nonprofits for various capital projects, has had its hands tied, unable to do that job since its authority was rescinded by the state Legislature in January 2008.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • In the interim, nonprofits seeking to grow their operations have been stuck in a state of arrested development.
  • Elizabeth Berger, president of the Downtown Alliance, which supports economic development in lower Manhattan, welcomed the mayor's announcement as a necessary step in enabling nonprofits to play their part in promoting the city's economic vitality.
  • “New York City is home to tens of thousands of nonprofits that are looking to expand, create jobs or move into new facilities, but for the past few years they have faced more expensive financing costs, while some have had to forgo expansion altogether,” Mr. Bloomberg said, in a statement. “This new entity will make it easier and more inexpensive for our critical nonprofit sector to grow and expand.”
  • While the city's nonprofits don't enjoy quite the same cachet in terms of revenue-generating potential as either financial services or leisure and hospitality, the group exceeds both sectors with respect to employment. While the other sectors employ approximately 434,000 and 320,000, respectively, the more than 42,000 health, human services and cultural nonprofit (HHSC) organizations throughout the five boroughs support approximately 470,000 employees, according to the mayor's office. That sector is the largest private employer in city—employing more than 15% of New York's non-governmental work force.
  • According to the mayor's office, more than 13 organizations have gone to out-of-state funding sources for assistance in financing capital projects totaling more than $337 million since June 2009. The administration also estimates nonprofits have at least 20 shovel-ready capital projects stuck in the development pipeline with a combined price tag of more than $400 million.
  • “At a time when many not-for-profits are struggling to make ends meet amid the nation's fiscal woes, this new issuer will serve to strengthen and support an increasingly important sector in our city's economy,” Ms. Berger said in the mayor's office statement. “In lower Manhattan, not-for-profits represent a vital and growing sector, and this action recognizes their value.”
  • Capital projects and investment in expansion and facilities upgrades have been curtailed as the volatile economy takes a toll on nonprofits struggling to make up for reductions in funding support. “For over three years, nonprofits like ours have faced far too many obstacles in obtaining financing to grow and expand,” Sisi Kamal, chief financial and operating officer at the Friends Seminary School, said in the statement. “The ability to locally access necessary financing in an efficient and cost-effective manner would be a significant investment in the future of our organization and that of many others serving the residents of New York City.”The administration said the new entity, a local development corporation, will open in the next four to six months and that financing requests will be based on board approval. The five borough presidents, in conjunction with the comptroller, will be charged with nominating directors to serve on the board.
  •  
    Bloomberg simplifies non-profit access to financing with new entity to help orgs gain access to low-cost, tax-exempt financing.
Tim Draimin

Nesta proposes new regulatory framework for social finance - Third Sector - 0 views

  • Nesta proposes new regulatory framework for social finance
  • By David Ainsworth, Third Sector Online, 23 June 2011
  • With the law firm Bates Wells & Braithwaite, it wants to get rid of 'onerous' restrictions and make it easier to lend money to charities and social enterprises
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • They would be overseen by a social finance regulator that would operate within the proposed Financial Conduct Authority, the successor to the Financial Services Authority.
  • The framework would create new legal categories of 'social investment' and 'social investor'. The two organisations hope to persuade the government to make it into law.
  • The National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts and the law firm Bates Wells & Braithwaite have proposed a new regulatory framework for social finance aimed at making it easier to invest in voluntary sector organisations.
  • "At the moment, it's easier to give £100 to charity than to lend £100 to charity," said Luke Fletcher, an associate at Bates Wells & Braithwaite and author of the report.
  • The new framework, he said, would make it easy for charities and social enterprises to create a financial prospectus for a bond or share offer, without the need to offer the tight protections for investors that are currently required.
  • "The main target for this would be the mass affluent, who are not currently considered sophisticated investors," Fletcher said. "Charities would like to create offers targeting these people, but they find the legal restrictions too onerous."
  • Fletcher said there were already exemptions for community benefit societies, formerly known as industrial and provident societies, and he wanted to extend these to all third sector organisations. "I think there's a chance of getting this into law now," he said. "There's a real window of opportunity. The reform of the Financial Services Authority is already under way, there's big interest from government in social investment and there's a drive to reduce red tape for the sector." The Cabinet Office has expressed support for the idea of a new regulatory framework in its strategy paper Growing the Social Investment Market, in which it said it would "seek further evidence on the impact of the regulatory framework on social and community investment to assess whether it is proportionate". One of the six key recommendations in Lord Hodgson's report on red tape in the third sector, Unshackling Good Neighbours, was the creation of a class of "social investors" who could invest under less strict guidelines because they understood they were receiving both a social and financial return.
  •  
    NESTA report on new initiative to simplify how charities and public benefit organizations put together a prospectus for raising money through a bond. The proposal also ties into a previous report on reducing red tape for charities (Lord Hodgson's "Unshackling Good Neighbours") that recommended the creation of a class of "social investors" who could invest under less strict guidelines because they understood they were receiving both a social and a financial return.
Joanna Reynolds

Environmental Finance | Welcome - 0 views

  •  
    Green Bonds
Adam Jagelewski

Social spending meets market discipline | Marketplace From American Public Media - 0 views

  • U.S. federal, state and city governments are moving toward testing a British idea for social programs: pay only if they achieve desired results
  • It's basically a no-lose proposition for government.
  • It's really the perfect tool for these tight fiscal times where so many core services are also being cut.
Tim Draimin

Big Society Bank Bank Delayed - 1 views

  • Big Society Bank delayed until 2012
  • Big Lottery has had to step in and start funding some social enterprise projects as Big Society Bank will not be open for business in July
  • In a twist of irony for a government that has set itself targets for ‘thickets’ of bureaucracy, dealings with European regulators over the state aid rules, along with ongoing talks with British high-street banks have pushed back the launch of Big Society Bank. This emerged from remarks made by Sir Ron Cohen, the Cabinet Office’s adviser on funding social projects, at the Public Administration Committee’s (PASC) meeting, ‘Smaller government, bigger society’ which met on Tuesday, 14 June 2011.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • The full transcript of the proceedings can be viewed online and provides a very helpful update on all the key issues surrounding Social Impact Bonds and Big Society Bank.[i]
  • Background to Big Society bank
  • Stephen Bubb’s comprehensive article ‘A new financial landscape’ in Caritas, March 2011  sets out the gestation and remit of what has been a long-awaited social investment bank and a useful summary can be found in the chapter 5 (page 37) of the Cabinet Office’s report, Growing the Social Investment market: A vision and strategy.[ii]
  • State aid legislation and other hold-ups
  • Cohen told the PASC that the Big Society Bank’s opening target of July 2011 would be missed “by a matter of some months” because of delays from the Cabinet Office in steering it through the complexities of EU state aid in financing public service provision legislation (in place to prevent the warping of the rules of competition between member countries). He said he encountered exactly the same thing with Bridges Ventures, his own organisation, and that he was confident that not only would the necessary permissions be given but that “the EU will turn out to be a big proponent of social investment.”
  • He also explained that the other complications was that the government had no agreement with UK banks the £200m of funding they had agreed on as part of the Project Merlin settlement, and that these details were still being sorted out.
  • In the meantime and agreement has been signed with Big Lottery so that it could fund some of the projects that Big Society Bank would eventually take over.
  • Long-term delivery  
  • When he was reminded that nine out of ten new enterprises end in failure, he countered with the response that everything ‘involves a risk’ and that failure in social enterprise was a form of philanthropy anyway. However, Cohen is a seasoned venture financier who does not set out to lose money. He added: “we see our objective as getting the social sector going. We have to preserve the value of our capital in doing it but we don’t have to maximise its value – we would like to be proactive.”   Cohen was confident of the Social Enterprise Bank’s long-term viability, explaining that real success could take ten or 20 years to materialise with cash positivity projected in seven years’ time.
  •  
    Update on the status of the Big Society Bank, reviewing challenges it faces leading to Big Lottery stepping in...
adamspence

Charities Aid Foundation launches new social investment fund - 1 views

  •  
    Interest in philanthropy is at an all time high and with many major donors looking for new ways to help charities and achieve the maximum impact with their donations, the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) has today launched a new social investment fund, the CAF Social Impact Fund. Philanthropists can invest their charitable capital in the fund which will provide loans for charities to help them become stronger and expand. Once loans are repaid the funds will be recycled enabling philanthropists to support more charities.
1 - 18 of 18
Showing 20 items per page