Skip to main content

Home/ Smarts project UOH/ Group items tagged evaluation

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Kate Bridgeman

Evaluation : Jisc - 1 views

  •  
    Useful links to resources in relation to eLearning and evaluation of learning resources. Useful for background information. All JISC projects, programmes or services are evaluated and occasionally JISC will also undertake longitudinal evaluation to assess whether outcomes have been embedded in learning, teaching research and administration.
Kate Bridgeman

Introduction - learning-resource-evaluation-guidelines - 0 views

  •  
    Useful and recent (2013) document providing learning resources evaluation guidelines. Could be useful starting point in thinking about how to evaluate materials
Kate Bridgeman

Microsoft Word - 07_sp_iss_4.doc - 5.pdf - 0 views

  •  
    This article presents the structure and theoretical foundations of the Learning Object Review Instrument (LORI), an evaluation aid available through the E-Learning Research and Assessment Network at http://www.elera.net. A primary goal of LORI is to balance assessment validity with efficiency of the evaluation process. The instrument enables learning object users to create reviews consisting of ratings and comments on nine dimensions of quality: content qualit y, learning goal alignment, feedback and adaptation, motivation, presentation design, interaction usability , accessibility, reusability, and standards compliance. The article presents research and practices relevant to these dimensions and describes how each dimension can be interpreted to evaluate multimedia learning resources.
Kate Bridgeman

Open educational resources programme - phase 1 : Jisc - 1 views

  •  
    Open educational resources programme 1 phase 1 - Jisc Useful in signposting to universities with OER's to evaluate
Kate Bridgeman

REAP > Home - 0 views

  •  
    REAP Re-engineering assessment practices in he (REAP project - redesign of assessment and feedback based on a self regulation model, ideas for policy, strategy, course design, student experience, monitoring and evaluating progress, good design principles etc
lwharf

Applying a framework to evaluating assignment marking software - 0 views

  •  
    This article presents the findings of a qualitative evaluation on the effect of a specialised software tool on the efficiency and quality of assignment marking. The software, Lightwork, combines with the Moodle learning management system and provides support through marking rubrics and marker allocations. Not for Grademark like most of the other sources and has creative commons
lwharf

teaching and Technology LectureCapture - 4 views

  •  
    Overview of some of the different uses of lecture capture including for exams, staff evaluation etc...
lwharf

Active collaborative learning - University of Strathclyde (Electronic Voting Systems) - 3 views

  •  
    Discussing conceptual questions in class with their peers has proved to be a powerful motivating force. Evaluations show that this increased interactivity has improved understanding and retention. - case study video/pdf
lwharf

Anne Eason presenting her experiences with SaGE (Submitting and Grading Electronically)... - 1 views

  •  
    Use, criticism, tips and evaluation of electronic marking via turnitin. Creative Commons 3.0 sharealike (needs accreditation).
1 - 9 of 9
Showing 20 items per page