Best content in Science - Spirituality in Dialogue

1More

Deist Clockwork Evolution vs Creationism vs Atheistic Evolution - 0 views

shared by Bill Tracer on 14 Dec 07 - Cached

Bill Tracer liked it

1More

Is It Irrational to Believe in God? - 0 views

www.relijournal.com/...tional-to-Believe-in-God.88670 atheist belief deist existence faith god infinity nonexistence nothingness theist

shared by Bill Tracer on 15 Jul 08 - Cached

Bill Tracer liked it

John Templeton, Philanthropist of Science and Religion, Dead at 95: Scientific American - 0 views

www.sciam.com/article.cfm religion science

shared by ken meece on 13 Jul 08 - Cached

1More

The Seeker - A personal and professional quest for truth | Chicago Tribune | Blog - 0 views

newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/...satanist-puts-f.html seeker

shared by ken meece on 13 Jul 08 - Cached

1More

Orderly Universe: Evidence of God? - 0 views

abcnews.go.com/print creation evolution

shared by ken meece on 20 Jun 08 - Cached

A Templeton Conversation: Does science make belief in God obsolete? - 0 views

www.templeton.org/belief god science

shared by ken meece on 04 Jun 08 - Cached

5More

Religion is a product of evolution, software suggests - being-human - 27 May 2008 - Pri... - 0 views

www.newscientist.com/article.ns religion science

shared by ken meece on 27 May 08 - Cached

"If a person is willing to sacrifice for an abstract god then people feel like they are willing to sacrifice for the community,"
...

Cancel
Theories on the evolution of religion tend toward two camps. One argues that religion is a mental artefact, co-opted from brain functions that evolved for other tasks. Aiding the people Another contends that religion benefited our ancestors. Rather than being a by-product of other brain functions, it is an adaptation in its own right. In this explanation, natural selection slowly purged human populations of the non-religious.
...

Cancel
The model assumes, in other words, that a small number of people have a genetic predisposition to communicate unverifiable information to others. They passed on that trait to their children, but they also interacted with people who didn't spread unreal information. The model looks at the reproductive success of the two sorts of people – those who pass on real information, and those who pass on unreal information.
...

Cancel
...1 more annotation...
Under most scenarios, "believers in the unreal" went extinct. But when Dow included the assumption that non-believers would be attracted to religious people because of some clear, but arbitrary, signal, religion flourished.
...

Cancel

ken meece on 27 May 08

God may work in mysterious ways, but a simple computer program may explain how religion evolved By distilling religious belief into a genetic predisposition to pass along unverifiable information, the program predicts that religion will flourish. However, religion only takes hold if non-believers help believers out - perhaps because they are impressed by their devotion.

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">God may work in mysterious ways, but a simple computer program may explain how religion evolved By distilling religious belief into a genetic predisposition to pass along unverifiable information, the program predicts that religion will flourish. However, religion only takes hold if non-believers help believers out - perhaps because they are impressed by their devotion.</div>

...

Cancel

1More

Secrets of Great Doctors: Get the Best Medical Care: Become a Smart Patient | Living He... - 0 views

www.rd.com/...article21817.html doctors health literacy

shared by ken meece on 17 May 08 - Cached

9More

The Neural Buddhists - New York Times - 0 views

www.nytimes.com/...13brooks.html neuroscience religion science

shared by ken meece on 14 May 08 - Cached

the militant materialism of some modern scientists. To these self-confident researchers, the idea that the spirit might exist apart from the body is just ridiculous. Instead, everything arises from atoms. Genes shape temperament. Brain chemicals shape behavior. Assemblies of neurons create consciousness. Free will is an illusion. Human beings are “hard-wired” to do this or that. Religion is an accident. In this materialist view, people perceive God’s existence because their brains have evolved to confabulate belief systems.
...

Cancel
the genetic and neuroscience revolutions would affect public debate. They would kick off another fundamental argument over whether God exists.
...

Cancel
The cognitive revolution is not going to end up undermining faith in God, it’s going to end up challenging faith in the Bible.
...

Cancel
...5 more annotations...
This new wave of research will not seep into the public realm in the form of militant atheism. Instead it will lead to what you might call neural Buddhism.
...

Cancel
First, the self is not a fixed entity but a dynamic process of relationships. Second, underneath the patina of different religions, people around the world have common moral intuitions. Third, people are equipped to experience the sacred, to have moments of elevated experience when they transcend boundaries and overflow with love. Fourth, God can best be conceived as the nature one experiences at those moments, the unknowable total of all there is.
...

Cancel
In unexpected ways, science and mysticism are joining hands and reinforcing each other. That’s bound to lead to new movements that emphasize self-transcendence but put little stock in divine law or revelation.
...

Cancel
the faithful have been defending the existence of God. That was the easy debate.
...

Cancel
The real challenge is going to come from people who feel the existence of the sacred, but who think that particular religions are just cultural artifacts built on top of universal human traits.
...

Cancel

ken meece on 14 May 08

the genetic and neuroscience revolutions would affect public debate. They would kick off another fundamental argument over whether God exists.

<div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">the genetic and neuroscience revolutions would affect public debate. They would kick off another fundamental argument over whether God exists.</div>

...

Cancel