Skip to main content

Home/ Science - Spirituality in Dialogue/ Group items tagged evolution

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Bill Tracer

Deist Clockwork Evolution vs Creationism vs Atheistic Evolution - 0 views

  •  
    When it come to a bebate between Deist Clockwork Evolution vs Creationism vs Atheistic Evolution, all too often, those who take up this topic for debate neglect to acknowledge the Deist option.
Bill Tracer

Evolution Need Not Threaten Belief in God - 0 views

  •  
    Expanded from a recent online discussion, this article emerged about how a belief in Evolution and a belief in God need not be mutually exclusive.
ken meece

Science and Religion: No Place for God - 0 views

  •  
    The National Academy of Sciences, the nation's most eminent scientific organization, produced a book on the evidence supporting the theory of evolution (and arguing against the introduction of creationism or other religious alternatives in public school science classes) in 1984. It published another in 1999. This month, they produced a third, but with a twist, for it is intended specifically for the lay public. Further, it devotes a great deal of space to an explanation of the differences between science and religion, maintaining that the acceptance of evolution does not require abandoning belief in God.
ken meece

BYU NewsNet - Lecture Examines Evolution, Religion - 0 views

  •  
    Nelson, a professor in the College of Biology and Agriculture, explained in his lecture titled "Evolution, Science, Religion: Overlaps and Boundaries," that neither faith, nor science alone can answer every inquiry.
ken meece

Rupert Sheldrake - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

  •  
    His book, A New Science of Life, was published a week after the New Scientist article. In it, Sheldrake put forward the hypothesis of formative causation (the theory of morphic resonance)[9], which proposes that phenomena - particularly biological ones - become more probable the more often they occur, and therefore that biological growth and behaviour become guided into patterns laid down by previous similar events. He suggested that this underlies many aspects of science, from evolution to laws of nature. Indeed, he wrote that the laws of nature might be thought of as mutable habits that have evolved since the Big Bang.
ken meece

Religion is a product of evolution, software suggests - being-human - 27 May 2008 - Pri... - 0 views

  • "If a person is willing to sacrifice for an abstract god then people feel like they are willing to sacrifice for the community,"
  • Theories on the evolution of religion tend toward two camps. One argues that religion is a mental artefact, co-opted from brain functions that evolved for other tasks. Aiding the people Another contends that religion benefited our ancestors. Rather than being a by-product of other brain functions, it is an adaptation in its own right. In this explanation, natural selection slowly purged human populations of the non-religious.
  • The model assumes, in other words, that a small number of people have a genetic predisposition to communicate unverifiable information to others. They passed on that trait to their children, but they also interacted with people who didn't spread unreal information. The model looks at the reproductive success of the two sorts of people – those who pass on real information, and those who pass on unreal information.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Under most scenarios, "believers in the unreal" went extinct. But when Dow included the assumption that non-believers would be attracted to religious people because of some clear, but arbitrary, signal, religion flourished.
  •  
    God may work in mysterious ways, but a simple computer program may explain how religion evolved By distilling religious belief into a genetic predisposition to pass along unverifiable information, the program predicts that religion will flourish. However, religion only takes hold if non-believers help believers out - perhaps because they are impressed by their devotion.
ken meece

TEILHARD DE CHARDIN - 0 views

  •  
    Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was a visionary French Jesuit, paleontologist, biologist, and philosopher, who spent the bulk of his life trying to integrate religious experience with natural science, most specifically Christian theology with theories of evolution.
ken meece

Rupert Sheldrake Online - Homepage - 0 views

  •  
    Rupert Sheldrake, one of the world's most innovative biologists, is best known for his theory of morphic fields and morphic resonance, which leads to a vision of a living, developing universe with its own inherent memory.
ken meece

Orderly Universe: Evidence of God? - 0 views

  •  
    It's Not Unusual for Order to Occur Naturally
ken meece

Seed: Suspending Life - 0 views

  •  
    Suspending Life
ken meece

Creationism dismissed as 'a kind of paganism' by Vatican's astronomer - 0 views

  • He described creationism, whose supporters want it taught in schools alongside evolution, as a "kind of paganism" because it harked back to the days of "nature gods" who were responsible for natural events. Brother Consolmagno argued that the Christian God was a supernatural one, a belief that had led the clergy in the past to become involved in science to seek natural reasons for phenomena such as thunder and lightning, which had been previously attributed to vengeful gods. "Knowledge is dangerous, but so is ignorance. That's why science and religion need to talk to each other," he said.
  • "Religion needs science to keep it away from superstition and keep it close to reality, to protect it from creationism, which at the end of the day is a kind of paganism - it's turning God into a nature god. And science needs religion in order to have a conscience, to know that, just because something is possible, it may not be a good thing to do."
  • the idea of papal infallibility had been a "PR disaster". What it actually meant was that, on matters of faith, followers should accept "somebody has got to be the boss, the final authority"
1 - 15 of 15
Showing 20 items per page