basic distinction in plagiarism is accidental and intentional -- would that apply? maybe some links on cheating would be in order even if most are likely not to be Dave's kind
In reading Deleuze one thougnt struck me. To make a list with categories is not a rhizomatic way of learning. In a cheating student intent and accident, economic and other causes could be present at the same time and in the same situation. Causes and influences must be looked as rhizomatic?
OK then make a free association list w/o categories, or put them on separate 3x5 cards and shuffle the deck -- or use a random generating program. According to Judge Dee, there is no such thing as an unmixed motive.
A nice overview to enhance the discussion.
with categories
To Top