Peer review: Trial by Twitter : Nature News - 0 views
-
UTS Library on 03 Mar 11Article in NatureNews about the influence of Twitter on peer review and poor quality research papers.
Group items tagged
I Got the Wrong Request from the Wrong Journal to Review the Wrong Piece. The... - 0 views
-
Sniffing out peer review scams
The Problems With Calling Comments "Post-Publication Peer-Review" - 0 views
-
what's hot and cooking in Scholarly Publishing - Scholarly Kitchen blog
RRResearch: Arsenic-associated bacteria (NASA's claims) - 0 views
-
Research blog post with over 250 comments about a review of a NASA paper making claims about a baterium that substitutes for phosphorus.
Posts - Research Blogging - 0 views
-
This pulls in feeds from others who blog about peer-reviewed research. Makes it easy for your readers - and others from around the world - to find your serious posts about academic research.
Creating And Distributing Presentations On The Web - Smashing Magazine - 0 views
-
How to use the Web to find content for your talks, record them, share them with others and save them for future audiences. Also explains how to share it all for free and how to convert closed formats into open ones by using the Web. A really useful review of mostly free software.
Social Media Lure Academics Frustrated by Traditional Publishing - Technology - The Chr... - 0 views
-
Short article on growing use of social media by academics (vice traditional publishing). Also touches on frustration with peer review.
ResearcherID.com - 0 views
-
ResearcherID is a global, multi-disciplinary scholarly research community. With a unique identifier assigned to each author in ResearcherID, you can eliminate author misidentification and view an author's citation metrics instantly. Search the registry to find collaborators, review publication lists and explore how research is used around the world.
Faculty of 1000 (F1000) - Post publication peer review - 0 views
-
"Faculty of 1000 (F1000) identifies and evaluates the most important articles in biology and medical research publications. The selection process comprises a peer-nominated global 'Faculty' of the world's leading scientists and clinicians who rate the best of the articles they read and explain their importance".
Scholarly Communication: A Devil's Dictionary | Peer to Peer Review - 0 views
Scrivener review - 0 views
Supporting literature reviews: materials for supervisors to use with students - 0 views
Finding Your Next Big (Adjacent) Idea - James L. McQuivey - Harvard Business Review - 1 views
-
Just a short, but possibly inspiring post about what ideas to start working with. It might be helpful to some researchers balancing contemporary and future focus.
1 - 14 of 14
Showing 20▼ items per page