Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ Public Philosophy
Kris Klotz

Public Sphere Project - 1 views

  •  
    Many projects and resources devoted "to help create and support equitable and effective public spheres all over the world."
Kris Klotz

An introduction to using Philica - 0 views

  •  
    Science journal that crowdsources reviews
Kris Klotz

PLOS ONE : accelerating the publication of peer-reviewed science - 0 views

  •  
    Commenting policies, of PLOS One
Kris Klotz

Peer review process | Economic Thought - 0 views

  •  
    Also has open peer discussion forum
André de Avillez

PeerJ's Open Review - 1 views

  •  
    a blog post discussing the experiences of a open peer review journal, with links to articles published alongside their review history.
André de Avillez

Open Review - 2 views

  •  
    A platform for peer review with several gradations of openness
André de Avillez

danah boyd | apophenia » Whistleblowing Is the New Civil Disobedience: Why Ed... - 1 views

  •  
    Post on whistleblowing as an act of civil disobedience. Might be of interest to discussions of public deliberation
André de Avillez

The Journal of Electronic Publishing - 1 views

  •  
    "The Journal of Electronic Publishing (JEP) is a forum for research and discussion about contemporary publishing practices, and the impact of those practices upon users."
André de Avillez

Exploring the Significance of Digital Humanities for Philosophy | Digital Scholarship i... - 1 views

  •  
    interesting post on the role of DH for philosophy (early mention of PPJ)
Mark Fisher

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1302/1302.5177.pdf - 5 views

  •  
    Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence
  • ...1 more comment...
  •  
    I found the diagram (five design categories) on page 3 helpful.
  •  
    Here is something to consider: Other things being equal, however, the available research supports the idea that people both prefer and are more productive when they are speaking rather than writing, probably because speech is less cognitively demanding than writing,70 but that people who are high in literacy prefer and absorb more information per unit time when they are reading text rather than listening to speech.71 This suggests a role for the developing technology of automatic speech recognition (ASR). If software can efficiently translate spoken words into text, then the users of an online system may be able to interact more optimally.
  •  
    And: One formulation of media richness theory is the following: When equivocality is high, individuals are likely to have different interpretations of problems and may disagree as to what information is needed to shape a solution. These conditions require that individuals must first create a shared sense of the situation and then, through negotiation and feedback, formulate a common response. Daft and his colleagues argue that this requires a rich communication medium, one that, in our terminology, provides interactivity and expressiveness. A medium that provides interactivity permits communication partners to exchange information rapidly, adjusting their messages in response to signals of understanding or misunderstanding, questions, or interruptions [citation omitted]. A medium that permits expressiveness allows individuals to convey not only the content of their ideas but also intensity and subtleties of meaning through intonation, facial expression, or gestures. According to the contingency hypothesis, when task equivocality is high, media richness is essential to effective communication. 74 Media richness theorists distinguish between "rich" and "lean" media, but this is usefully refined into the interactivity and expressiveness dimensions defined above.
Kris Klotz

Philosophy of science as a tool for change | Reaction Crate - 2 views

  •  
    Blog post from last February mentioning the PPJ, from one of the first to express interest in the PPJ on the google form
Kris Klotz

The Digital Humanities - 2 views

  •  
    This is a google doc of blogs and other sites curated through PressForward by DH Now.
  •  
    I also posted this in our Behind the Scenes community page. I'm going to begin working through it manually to find sites that are relevant for us.
  •  
    Great find! I'll start working through it as well. I'll work from the bottom up.
Kris Klotz

Systems: An open, two-stage peer-review journal - 3 views

  • In the first stage, manuscripts that pass a rapid pre-screening (access review) are immediately published as 'discussion papers' on the journal's website. They are then subject to interactive public discussion for a period of 8 weeks, during which the comments of designated reviewers, additional comments by other interested members of the scientific community, and the authors' replies are published alongside the discussion paper. Reviewers can choose to sign their comments or remain anonymous, but comments by other scientists must be signed.
  •  
    Brief article in Nature on open peer review process of two science journals
  •  
    Very interesting hypothesis: "These numbers support the idea that public peer review and interactive discussion deter authors from submitting low-quality manuscripts, and thus relieve editors and reviewers from spending too much time on deficient submissions."
  •  
    I noticed Chris tweeted that comment earlier. It's a good complement to the more common finding of confirmation bias.
Mark Fisher

The "Nasty Effect:" Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies - A... - 2 views

  • The purpose of this study is to examine how uncivil online interpersonal discussion may contribute to polarization of perceptions about an issue.
  • Uncivil discourse is a growing concern in American rhetoric, and this trend has expanded beyond traditional media to online sources, such as audience comments. Using an experiment given to a sample representative of the U.S. population, we examine the effects online incivility on perceptions toward a particular issue—namely, an emerging technology, nanotechnology. We found that exposure to uncivil blog comments can polarize risk perceptions of nanotechnology along the lines of religiosity and issue support.
  •  
    Skim for Wed. 1/22--pdf accessible from site.
Mark Fisher

"Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Politic... - 5 views

  •  
    Skim for Wed. 1/22
« First ‹ Previous 61 - 80 of 123 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page