Public Sphere Project - 1 views
An introduction to using Philica - 0 views
Peer review process | Economic Thought - 0 views
PeerJ's Open Review - 1 views
Open Review - 2 views
Why Academic Papers Are A Terrible Discussion Forum | The Rationalist Conspiracy - 0 views
danah boyd | apophenia » Whistleblowing Is the New Civil Disobedience: Why Ed... - 1 views
The Journal of Electronic Publishing - 1 views
Exploring the Significance of Digital Humanities for Philosophy | Digital Scholarship i... - 1 views
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1302/1302.5177.pdf - 5 views
-
Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence
- ...1 more comment...
-
Here is something to consider: Other things being equal, however, the available research supports the idea that people both prefer and are more productive when they are speaking rather than writing, probably because speech is less cognitively demanding than writing,70 but that people who are high in literacy prefer and absorb more information per unit time when they are reading text rather than listening to speech.71 This suggests a role for the developing technology of automatic speech recognition (ASR). If software can efficiently translate spoken words into text, then the users of an online system may be able to interact more optimally.
-
And: One formulation of media richness theory is the following: When equivocality is high, individuals are likely to have different interpretations of problems and may disagree as to what information is needed to shape a solution. These conditions require that individuals must first create a shared sense of the situation and then, through negotiation and feedback, formulate a common response. Daft and his colleagues argue that this requires a rich communication medium, one that, in our terminology, provides interactivity and expressiveness. A medium that provides interactivity permits communication partners to exchange information rapidly, adjusting their messages in response to signals of understanding or misunderstanding, questions, or interruptions [citation omitted]. A medium that permits expressiveness allows individuals to convey not only the content of their ideas but also intensity and subtleties of meaning through intonation, facial expression, or gestures. According to the contingency hypothesis, when task equivocality is high, media richness is essential to effective communication. 74 Media richness theorists distinguish between "rich" and "lean" media, but this is usefully refined into the interactivity and expressiveness dimensions defined above.
The Digital Humanities - 2 views
-
This is a google doc of blogs and other sites curated through PressForward by DH Now.
-
I also posted this in our Behind the Scenes community page. I'm going to begin working through it manually to find sites that are relevant for us.
-
Great find! I'll start working through it as well. I'll work from the bottom up.
Systems: An open, two-stage peer-review journal - 3 views
-
In the first stage, manuscripts that pass a rapid pre-screening (access review) are immediately published as 'discussion papers' on the journal's website. They are then subject to interactive public discussion for a period of 8 weeks, during which the comments of designated reviewers, additional comments by other interested members of the scientific community, and the authors' replies are published alongside the discussion paper. Reviewers can choose to sign their comments or remain anonymous, but comments by other scientists must be signed.
-
Brief article in Nature on open peer review process of two science journals
-
Very interesting hypothesis: "These numbers support the idea that public peer review and interactive discussion deter authors from submitting low-quality manuscripts, and thus relieve editors and reviewers from spending too much time on deficient submissions."
-
I noticed Chris tweeted that comment earlier. It's a good complement to the more common finding of confirmation bias.
The "Nasty Effect:" Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies - A... - 2 views
-
The purpose of this study is to examine how uncivil online interpersonal discussion may contribute to polarization of perceptions about an issue.
-
Uncivil discourse is a growing concern in American rhetoric, and this trend has expanded beyond traditional media to online sources, such as audience comments. Using an experiment given to a sample representative of the U.S. population, we examine the effects online incivility on perceptions toward a particular issue—namely, an emerging technology, nanotechnology. We found that exposure to uncivil blog comments can polarize risk perceptions of nanotechnology along the lines of religiosity and issue support.
"Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Politic... - 5 views
« First
‹ Previous
61 - 80 of 123
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page