Skip to main content

Home/ Public Philosophy/ Group items tagged policies

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
André de Avillez

Comments policy - Crooked Timber - 0 views

crookedtimber.org/ls-sockpuppets-and-other-pests

policies

shared by André de Avillez on 20 Feb 14 - No Cached
  • André de Avillez on 20 Feb 14
     
    interesting commenting policy. Their policies re: sock puppets may be worth implementing
Kris Klotz

Comments Policy - New APPS: Art, Politics, Philosophy, Science - 1 views

www.newappsblog.com/comments-policy.html

PSD policies

shared by Kris Klotz on 14 Jan 14 - No Cached
    • Kris Klotz
      Kris Klotz on 14 Jan 14
       
      New APPS's comments policy. As an example, may be useful for our discussion of deliberation practices.
  • André de Avillez on 17 Jan 14
     
    I generally like New APPS's policies, but we need to do better than them when it comes to respecting the anonymity of commentators. On one occasion, Catarina Novaes partially identified an anonymous commentator by tracing his/her IP address (it came from her office building). I can't find the link to that post at the moment, but it was very bad form on her part (and on the part of other NewAPPS authors, who defended her actions). If we allow users to post anonymously, we must not reveal their identities. If we think that they are hecklers, we can delete their comments and ban them, but not provide any identifying information.
André de Avillez

PLOS Medicine: A Peer-Reviewed Open-Access Journal - 0 views

www.plosmedicine.org/...policies

policies

shared by André de Avillez on 21 Oct 14 - No Cached
  • André de Avillez on 21 Oct 14
     
    General Policies for PLOS journals
André de Avillez

Article withdrawal | Elsevier - 0 views

www.elsevier.com/...article-withdrawal

policies

shared by André de Avillez on 21 Oct 14 - No Cached
  • André de Avillez on 21 Oct 14
     
    policies for retracting/withdrawing published articles
Kris Klotz

PLOS ONE : accelerating the publication of peer-reviewed science - 0 views

www.plosone.org/...commentGuidelines

policies

shared by Kris Klotz on 10 Feb 14 - No Cached
  • Kris Klotz on 10 Feb 14
     
    Commenting policies, of PLOS One
André de Avillez

Chapter 2. Communication-specific guidelines - 0 views

people.debian.org/...ch02.html

policies

shared by André de Avillez on 20 Oct 14 - No Cached
  • André de Avillez on 20 Oct 14
     
    Good resource for policies on community communication
Kris Klotz

BioMed Central | The BMC-series journals - 1 views

www.biomedcentral.com/...bmcseries

Peer Review policies

shared by Kris Klotz on 16 Jan 14 - No Cached
    • Kris Klotz
      Kris Klotz on 16 Jan 14
       
      BioMed Central publishes several open peer reviewed journals. I've highlighted a relevant portion of its peer review policy.
  • Open peer review means that, firstly, the reviewers' names are included on the peer review reports, and secondly that, if the manuscript is published, the reports are made available online along with the final version of the manuscript. The published article will provide a link to its 'pre-publication history', which lists all the versions of the manuscript, all the signed reviews, and all responses to the reviewers since the submission of the manuscript until its publication.
Kris Klotz

Peer review process | BMJ - 0 views

www.bmj.com/...peer-review-process

Peer Review policies

shared by Kris Klotz on 16 Jan 14 - No Cached
  • The BMJ now has a system of open peer review. This means that reviewers have to sign their reports, saying briefly who they are and where they work. We also ask reviewers to declare to the editors any competing interests that might relate to articles we have asked them to review, and we take these into account when considering reviewers' comments. When such competing interests are too great reviewers usually decline the assignment. Open peer review does not mean that authors should feel able to contact reviewers directly to discuss their reports; all queries should still be directed through the editorial office.
  • We will send you a decision letter and report from the meeting as soon as possible; usually within a few days but longer if we have asked for an additional detailed report from the statistics editor or another reviewer. The report will list the names of everyone who took part in the discussion about your article.
    • Kris Klotz
      Kris Klotz on 16 Jan 14
       
      Open peer review policy of British Medical Journal
Mark Fisher

Risk and Ethics in Public Scholarship | Inside Higher Ed - 1 views

www.insidehighered.com/...-and-ethics-public-scholarship

scholarship public PSD

shared by Mark Fisher on 16 Jan 14 - No Cached
  • Doing academia in public view is both a powerful tool and a potentially powerful weapon.
  • There is no buffer in public writing.
  • And for many readers the allure of attacking the writer instead of the work is too seductive to deny. That can be a shock when you are accustomed to the civil discourse, no matter how thin or banal, that governs academic critique.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • While universities are quick to promote public scholarship they are loath to extend their responsibility to include refereeing the behavior of academics in the public sphere.
  • As my friend discovered, there is no ethic guiding public scholarship
  • The inequalities women and minorities face in traditional academic models only exacerbates the potential risks of contributing to public scholarship.
  • That is potentially devastating to those who would benefit most from the kind of visibility, credibility, and network building that public scholarship can provide.
  • Mark Fisher on 16 Jan 14
     
    Description of some of the issues we need to address under the idea of a 'safe space'. Contrast between academia and publicness that is relevant to the normative policies of PSD 
Mark Fisher

Scholarship in Public: Knowledge Creation and Tenure Policy in the Engaged University |... - 1 views

imaginingamerica.org/...licy-in-the-engaged-university

public scholarship peer PSD

shared by Mark Fisher on 16 Jan 14 - No Cached
  • Mark Fisher on 16 Jan 14
     
    Link to PDF of Report from Imagining America
Kris Klotz

Editorial Policies - 0 views

lexicon.cnr.it/...editorialPolicies

Peer Review policies

shared by Kris Klotz on 17 Jan 14 - No Cached
    • Kris Klotz
      Kris Klotz on 17 Jan 14
       
      Lexicon Philosophicum (which works with Project Agora) uses open peer review after a double-blind peer review.
  • One-month of open-review, during which registered users of the journal platform will be enabled to comment on and to discuss the selected and peer reviewed papers. Authors will be able to use these comments and discussions to revise their final submission for publication.
André de Avillez

OWS interviews Partido X - 0 views

occupywallst.org

public activism collaboration

shared by André de Avillez on 19 Feb 14 - No Cached
  • the program of the Partido X is developed through crowd-sourced drafting of public policy proposals, where we invite groups or experts that are already working on a given issue and are socially recognized for it to submit the first draft of a policy proposal and later we post it online for the network to amend.
  • More than 2,000 people have participated so far in the amend processes, and as the platform grows so do their numbers: around 25,000 are registered in their newsletter, which is the first step to collaborate in the network.
  • André de Avillez on 19 Feb 14
     
    OWS website. if we're looking for activists and activism, we'll probably find them here...
Kris Klotz

Author Rights: Using the SPARC Author Addendum to secure your rights as the author of a... - 0 views

www.sparc.arl.org/...addendum

open access rights

shared by Kris Klotz on 16 Jan 14 - No Cached
    • Kris Klotz
      Kris Klotz on 16 Jan 14
       
      Bookmarking this for our eventual discussion of editorial policies
Mark Fisher

Taking Public Scholarship Seriously - The Chronicle Review - The Chronicle of Higher Ed... - 2 views

chronicle.com/...22684

public scholarship chronicle

shared by Mark Fisher on 16 Jan 14 - No Cached
  • June 9, 2006
    • Mark Fisher
      Mark Fisher on 16 Jan 14
       
      Speaks directly to the need for PPJ Provides another characterization of Public Scholarship
  • We need to develop flexible but clear guidelines for recognizing and rewarding public scholarship and artistic production.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • That is the basic purpose of a new national effort spearheaded by Im
  • agining America: Artists and Scholars in Public Life, a consortium supported by 70-odd colleges and universities, including Syracuse University and CalArts. Based at the University of Michigan, the consortium is establishing a "tenure team" to develop policies and processes that appropriately value public scholarship and engaged artistic creation in the cultural disciplines.
  • Our working definition of public scholarship in the arts and humanities comprises research, scholarship, or creative activity that: connects directly to the work of specific public groups in specific contexts; arises from a faculty member's field of knowledge; involves a cohesive series of activities contributing to the public welfare and resulting in "public good" products; is jointly planned and carried out by coequal partners; and integrates discovery, learning, and public engagement. As we move toward a consensus on what constitutes public scholarship, we are committed to developing criteria for the excellence of this work.
  • We are also looking for a broader definition of "peer" in "peer review," to include recognized nonacademic leaders in public scholarship and public-art making
  • Perhaps most important, we are recommending that faculty members and evaluators not advise junior colleagues to postpone public scholarship if that is where their passions lie.
Mark Fisher

Public Scholarship | Simpson Center for the Humanities - 2 views

depts.washington.edu/...public-scholarship

scholarship public PSD

shared by Mark Fisher on 16 Jan 14 - No Cached
  • Its ethics and values hold central:
  • Relationship-building, reciprocity, and mutual benefit Participation, transparency, and reflection Innovation, integration, and dialogue Cultural diversity and social equality In coming to these forms of “applied” scholarship, humanities scholars have emphasized the way that culture in its many forms mediates interactions, development, and knowledge.
  • Publicly-engaged scholarship yields diverse artifacts, informing knowledge in multiple domains Policy and planning recommendations Museum exhibitions and public performances New curricula for courses or workshops Books and journal articles As consequence, public scholarship also yields new connections among disciplines, communities, and sectors. 
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Public scholarship refers to diverse modes of creating and circulating knowledge for and with publics and communities. It often involves mutually-beneficial partnerships between higher education and organizations in the public and private sectors.
  • Mark Fisher on 16 Jan 14
     
    This provides a nice overview of public scholarship; Guiding Principles Diverse Artifacts (Review Objects
Kris Klotz

An introduction to using Philica - 0 views

www.philica.com/tutorial.php

policies Peer Review

shared by Kris Klotz on 10 Feb 14 - Cached
  • Kris Klotz on 10 Feb 14
     
    Science journal that crowdsources reviews
Kris Klotz

Peer review process | Economic Thought - 0 views

et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/peer-review-process

Peer Review policies open access

shared by Kris Klotz on 10 Feb 14 - No Cached
  • Kris Klotz on 10 Feb 14
     
    Also has open peer discussion forum
1 - 20 of 32 Next ›
Showing 20▼ items per page