Skip to main content

Home/ Public Philosophy/ Group items tagged rights

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Kris Klotz

Author Rights: Using the SPARC Author Addendum to secure your rights as the author of a... - 0 views

www.sparc.arl.org/...addendum

open access rights

shared by Kris Klotz on 16 Jan 14 - No Cached
    • Kris Klotz
      Kris Klotz on 16 Jan 14
       
      Bookmarking this for our eventual discussion of editorial policies
Mark Fisher

Public Scholarship | Center for Leadership & Engagement - 2 views

wagner.edu/...public-scholarship

public scholarship PSD

shared by Mark Fisher on 16 Jan 14 - No Cached
  • By Public Scholarship we mean bringing the best thinking and research to bear on the most critical issues facing society today.  Public Scholarship also entails a commitment to publishing letters, op-eds, and articles in newspapers, magazines, websites, blogs, and other forms of social media to raise awareness about these issues, to stimulate broad discussion, and to explore the role timely scholarship can play in addressing our most challenging problems. Public scholars strive to communicate simply and clearly to a wide audience, and therefore adopt a journalistic style in which sentences are crisp, paragraphs are brief, and jargon is employed sparingly. While public scholars embrace theory and sophisticated research approaches, they particularly seek to translate theory into practice and to use research findings to shed compelling light on the causes and the effects of pressing social issues. Public scholars also recognize that social issues which affect the broadest range of people matter most. Consequently, issues of poverty, hunger, access to education and healthcare, concerns about the rights of immigrants and other marginalized groups, as well as efforts to ensure public safety and promote social well-being are social priorities that deserve unusually extensive coverage. Public Scholarship is a means by which teachers and scholars can promote the public good, and we encourage faculty, staff, and students to find engaging and innovative ways to communicate with a broader public. We, in the Center for Leadership and Engagement, are pleased to support these efforts and to provide outlets on our website for sharing a variety of perspectives.
  • Mark Fisher on 16 Jan 14
     
    Characterization of public scholarship
Chris Long

Community and Communication | Kris Klotz - 1 views

www.krisklotz.com/?p=16

shared by Chris Long on 19 May 14 - No Cached
  • Dewey’s task, then, was to articulate the means by which the public can discover and identify itself, “so that genuinely shared interest in the consequences of interdependent activities may inform desire and effort and thereby direct action.”
  • Communication of the results of social inquiry is the same thing as the formation of public opinion.
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 19 May 14
       
      Here I wonder if we can link to Habermas and the movement from Leserwelt to public.
  • freedom from government-sanctioned doctrinal constraints; and freedom to pursue the truth wherever it might lead in making a contribution to the world of learning.
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 19 May 14
       
      Refer to this in my section on Kant as not giving up his private rights in writing on the enlightenment.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • While Dewey agrees with Lippmann
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 19 May 14
       
      I'd like to hear more about the Lippmann argument here. Just a few sentences.
  • In this case, philosophers must be considered not as faculty members but as fellow citizens
  • If so, how does a philosophical community balance the opportunities for communication made possible by growing interest in the digital humanities with the need for active local communities?
André de Avillez

Art and Truth after Plato // Reviews // Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews // University ... - 4 views

ndpr.nd.edu/...8190-art-and-truth-after-plato

shared by André de Avillez on 17 Jun 14 - No Cached
  • The purpose of this book, we are told right at the start, is to address anew 'the old question, often neglected in contemporary aesthetic debates, about art and truth, or art and cognition' (p. 1)
  • His purpose is to survey these varied responses, trace their development and adjudicate among them
  • very widely, and considers many writers who get scant attention nowadays
  • ...23 more annotations...
  • His opening chapter sets out Plato's contentions about art and truth
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      Summary points here seem fair.
  • In any event, though the chapter on 'Christian Platonic and Anti-Platonic Art' is not noticeably shorter than the others, it does not have a key role in the philosophical trajectory that Rockmore is tracing.
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      Critical comment, but fairly stated, not harsh, matter of fact.
  • very widely, and considers many writers who get scant attention nowadays
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      Not clear if these are positive or negative points, but the focus on those who receive scant attention point seems positive.
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      Identifies aims - good, but relies on direct quotation - bad.
  • rather long and unusual excursion through Marxist aesthetics.
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      There is implicit judgement here, and no imagination about why Rockmore might be taking this approach. More generosity needed here.
  • This is a hugely ambitious book, and the range of reading that has gone into its making cannot but be impressive, though the steady flow of many lengthy summaries and brief references to a huge number of writers makes for rather heavy going on the part of the reader.
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      Praise, tempered by a sort of critique here. As if a simply positive remark can't stand on its own. Also, the vocabulary is one of coercion "cannot but be impressive."
  • more importantly flawed, and in a number of critical ways
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      OK, but is this the best way to say this?
  • No real evidence is offered of this neglect, and indeed the book is remarkable for making virtually no reference to contemporary work in aesthetics.
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      Fair point about references, but fine. Then belittling language "even the briefest survey would show..." - shame tactic.
  • Rockmore might object
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      Indication that the reviewer is imagining his way into the mind of the author - imagine a response. Good.
  • Viewed in this light, however, it does not come out very well.
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      So simple positive comments are avoided, but simple negative ones are not. Then ...  "conspicuous failures."
  • (to my mind)
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      Recognizes own position might be limited.
  • serious methodological weaknesses that undermine some of its claims.
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      Negative comment, not nasty, but not nicely put.
  • what most people recognize to be a caricature
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      Appeal to "most people" is a failure to take ownership of own critique.
  • It is no pleasure to give a serious and substantial philosophical work such a low rating. So on the positive side I think it can safely be said that readers will undoubtedly benefit from Rockmore's range of reference.
    • Chris Long
      Chris Long on 20 Aug 14
       
      Begrudging critique, but limited praise.
    • André de Avillez
      André de Avillez on 20 Aug 14
       
      Overview of target project.  Seems like one the author would endorse, but it's impossible to know without asking the author, and difficult to guess without having read the work being reviewed.
  • hat 'long ago'
    • André de Avillez
      André de Avillez on 20 Aug 14
       
      Derisive tone
  • story
    • André de Avillez
      André de Avillez on 20 Aug 14
       
      Referring to the content of the book as a story rather than as a historical overview implies that the work lacks academic legitimacy
  • 'Middle Ages'
    • André de Avillez
      André de Avillez on 20 Aug 14
       
      The use of scare quotes here, and the qualifiers that follow, imply a veiled criticism. It seems that criticisms must be open in order to be collegial, for otherwise they imply that the target's author is too dimwitted to grasp a meaning which is plainly grasped by the reviewer and the audience.
  • even the briefest survey would show, I think, that 'aesthetic cognitivism', as it is increasingly referred to, is not only widely discussed, but alive and wel
    • André de Avillez
      André de Avillez on 20 Aug 14
       
      Very critical language, framing a serious critique.  Yet it seems that the obvious has not been stated: the author was too focused on the continental tradition, and the reviewer was largely unfamiliar with that tradition (so much so that he saw the "excursion" into marxist aesthetics as unusual)
  • For example, he uses the expressions 'art and truth' and 'art and cognition' more or less interchangeably. But the conflation of 'truth' and 'cognition' confounds many of the issues he want to discuss, because there are important dimensions to cognition other than truth
    • André de Avillez
      André de Avillez on 20 Aug 14
       
      Criticism of the target, attempted at the target's own terms.
  • with which contemporary aesthetics is concerned.
    • André de Avillez
      André de Avillez on 20 Aug 14
       
      One has to worry here of how the discipline is being defined.  Does analytic philosophy have dominance over the field?
  • In doing so he ranges very widely, and considers many writers who get scant attention nowadays, devoting a whole chapter to 'Marx, Marxism, and Aesthetic Realism', for instance.
    • André de Avillez
      André de Avillez on 20 Aug 14
       
      Praise for target of review
  • n any event, though the chapter on 'Christian Platonic and Anti-Platonic Art' is not noticeably shorter than the others, it does not have a key role in the philosophical trajectory that Rockmore is tracing.
    • André de Avillez
      André de Avillez on 20 Aug 14
       
      Implies that the chapter is unnecessary, and does not attempt to see why it would have been left in.  Even if a philosophical aesthetics is not present in this long period, the author may have chosen to discuss it for the sake of completeness, and to show to what extent a philosophy of art/ aesthetics existed in the middle ages.
  • André de Avillez on 17 Jun 14
     
    A negative review which labors to see the merits in the target
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20▼ items per page