"About four years ago, I wrote an article on Learning Ecology, Communities, and Networks. In many ways, it was the start for me of what has become a somewhat sustained dialogue on teaching, learning, knowledge change, connectivism, and so on. Connectivism represents the act of learning as a network formation process (at an external, conceptual, and neural level …and, as I've stated previously, finds it's epistemological basis in part on Stephen's work with connective knowledge). Others have tackled the changes of technology with a specific emphasis on networked learning - Leigh Blackall, for example). And some have explored network learning from a standards perspective (Rob Koper). While not always obvious, there is a significant amount of work occurring on the subject of networked learning. What used to be the side show activity of only a few edubloggers now has the attention of researchers, academics, and conferences worldwide. Networked learning is popping up in all sorts of conference and book chapter requests - it's largely the heart of what's currently called web 2.0, and I fully expect it [networked learning] will outlive the temporary buzz and hype of all thing 2.0."
A (relatively) early discussion of the role of educator as curator published by George Siemens back in August 2007. I wonder if his perspective has changed since?
Does Connectivism continue to play an important role in the development and emergence of new pedagogies, where control is shifting from the tutor to an increasingly more autonomous learner
"The Personal Learning Environment concept is relatively new and is often used interchangeably with Personal Learning Network. The earliest reference is attributed to George Siemens in his 2004 paper, Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Downes and Attwell have also popularised the concept with Downes describing the PLE as "a tool that allows for a learner (or anyone) to engage in a distributed environment consisting of a network of people, services and resources" (2006, p23).
Semantically, a personal learning environment and a personal learning network differ, with a network referring to connections and the interaction between them, and an environment referring to a broader definition that includes more passive tools and settings. The network and its broader socially constructed environment are interdependent, constantly shaping each other and unable to be separated."
"George Siemens, with Athabasca's Technology Enhanced Knowledge Research Institute, is best known for his development of the pedagogical model of networked learning known as Connectivism. He and Steven Downes have pioneered the development of massive open courses, in which many hundreds of students study and learn in open and networked contexts." - It's all about MOOCs like PLENK2010
They sometimes call themselves as parasites – I have named this “copy-paste”
expertise. Is this behavior the purpose (excellent) or false (do not know one’s
borders).
I'm not sure about Heli's excellent/false labels. If the 'parasites' are condensing, summarising and sharing knowledge, then they will have a positive impact on the global learning of the network (because some of their followers don't like to read heaps, or just didn't catch the relevant posting.) I suppose if that is their intended purpose then 'excellent' applies. I'm not sure about the 'false' as the borders are self defined and can change depending on what you think you are learning/sharing and what role you are taking in that process. I sometimes feel a little 'false' when I post something but I think this a lack of confidence and a feeling that I am trespassing more than that I'm having a negative impact on anyone's PLN.