read carefully with their students and in many cases reread texts several times
cite evidence to justify statements
increasingly complex texts
teachers will have to choose materials that are appropriate for their grade level; states and organizations are now developing tools to help teachers evaluate complexity.
Expect to see teachers asking students to engage in small-group and whole-class discussions and evaluating them on how well they understand the speakers’ points.
the Common Core Standards are intended to focus on fewer topics and address them in greater depth
The Standards include criteria for literacy in history/social science, science, and technical subjects. This reflects a recognition that understanding texts in each of these subject areas requires a unique set of skills and that instruction in understanding
teachers should concentrate on the most important topics,
in depth
s an integral part of teaching history
say, a historical document
glean information from a document and make judgments about its credibility
The Common Core Standards, by contrast, are designed to build on students’ understanding by introducing new topics from grade to grade.
expected to learn content and skills and move to more advanced topics
hey suggest relationships between Standards
Students will need to know procedures fluently, develop a deep conceptual understanding, and be able to apply their knowledge to solve problems.
The skill I most looked for in applicants was the ability to listen. While listening can be learned, it was one skill that I wanted a prospective coach to already have.
reflective learners
committed to improving their practice and learning more and refining their skills
From Ellen: If you haven't had a chance yet, please read Learning Forward's article, "A New Game Plan - Professional learning redesign makes the case for teacher voices" published in The Learning System. I think many of the ideas captured here will resonate with you and your work. This article may be appropriate for your monthly coaches' networking meeting discussions.
Literacy changes taking hold in schools recognize the subject's expansion from traditional textbooks to online readings, images and audio. New learning standards ask students to read more closely and write more analytically, meaning teachers must adapt curriculum to get students reading earlier.
Advocates say the movement offers an opportunity for schools to shift away from arbitrary credit-hour requirements toward a system based on evidence of progress in specific instructional skills.
On the topic of prereading and scaffolding, the most recent version takes care to "leave room for a wide range of instructional approaches" that engage students in reading, while at the same time "setting some basic parameters based on the standards," such as ensuring that scaffolding "does not pre-empt or replace the need to read the text,"
To argue that meaning resides solely in the text is antithetical to several decades of research which shows that meaning is in the interaction of reader and text,"
"In too many classrooms, the actual text never enters the discussion," he said. "It's all about kids' feelings about it, or their experiences related to it. The teacher spends 45 minutes wallowing in that space, but never gets into the information in the text."
"to do quite a bit of framing to get my kids to the point where they can wrestle with the text."
oesn't need to be an either-or,
To do that, teachers have many strategies at their disposal, he noted. They can supply information upfront, when appropriate. They can plan a cold reading but assign texts leading up to it that will fill in knowledge gaps. They can ask students to read a group of surrounding pieces in conjunction with a central text.