Skip to main content

Home/ Philosophy for teens/ Group items tagged debate

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
dunya darwiche

Debate.org | Interrogators should have the legal right to torture terrorists. - 0 views

www.debate.org/...1

torture

shared by dunya darwiche on 09 Nov 10 - No Cached
  • An interrogation is deliberately causing someone pain or anguish in order to extract information out of them.
  • Mind control drugs, sleep deprivation, good cop-bad cop techniques, and verbal intimidation are a few interrogation techniques that are currently legal.
  • Sometimes you have to do wrong thing for the right reason.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • chinese water method
  • Wouldn't the government have a moral duty to do whatever is necessary to get the information out of the suspect? Using violence to protect innocent people isn't morally wrong. It's self defense.
  • Water boarding
  • The Rack
  • Chinese Water Torture
  • "Truly Torture
  • New York Times Article entitled
Daryl Bambic

The Value of Philosophy by Bertrand Russell on Audio Download - Free Audio - 0 views

www.learnoutloud.com/...22918

value philosophy russell

shared by Daryl Bambic on 10 May 12 - Cached
  • Daryl Bambic on 10 May 12
     
    For the debate in pft
mariakanarakis

The philosophy of science - 0 views

undsci.berkeley.edu/...philosophy

philosophy religion science evidence truth

shared by mariakanarakis on 17 May 12 - No Cached
  • mariakanarakis on 17 May 12
     
    This site is credible because it has useful information which is related to science and it also has some definitions which can be useful for our debates
vince chatigny-barbosa

Is torture acceptable? - 1 views

www.uspoliticsonline.net/...23837-torture-acceptable.html

shared by vince chatigny-barbosa on 06 Nov 10 - No Cached
  • Daryl Bambic on 08 Nov 10
     
    Not a great site. It`s a discussion forum.
Chrissy Le

CONS - Euthanasia - 5 views

www.buzzle.com/...os-and-cons-of-euthanasia.html

euthanasia cons pros debate morals

shared by Chrissy Le on 20 Nov 10 - Cached
  • Chrissy Le on 20 Nov 10
     
    Euthanasia is to end one's life, the purpose being, to end pain and suffering. The decision is made by the individual himself/herself or the family members if that individual is not capable to make the decision. The site I have given looks at the pros and cons of euthanasia, but my focus' are the cons. I found these arguments to be very valid and ones that I have not yet thought of.
  • mira ahmad on 23 Nov 10
     
    Chrissy! I find this link helpful because it gives clear and precise arguments that are for and against euthanasia. It's a simple and easy way to get more arguments for our subject! (They obviously need more research and depth though).
  • Catherine Delisle on 24 Nov 10
     
    This link is very helpful for both the for and against sides of euthanasia. It contains a lot of information that can be useful for both sides. The only bad aspect of this website is it's credibility.
Kayla Korman

Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in Canada (91-9E) - 2 views

www2.parl.gc.ca/...919-e.htm

shared by Kayla Korman on 23 Nov 10 - No Cached
  • AIDS and Alzheimer’s disease;
  • n early times euthanasia was generally equated with suicide.
  • Euthanasia is the deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending the life of another person in order to relieve that person’s suffering.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • he Criminal Code and Euthanasia
  • No person is entitled to consent to have death inflicted on him, and such consent does not affect the criminal responsibility of any person by whom death may be inflicted on the person by whom consent is given.
  • n the medical context, a doctor who, at a patient’s request, gives the patient a lethal injection would be criminally liable. A number of other provisions of the Criminal Code may also come into play, depending upon the circumstances; these provisions include:
  • B.  Legal Issues
  • Theoretically, one would expect euthanasia to be prosecuted as first-degree murder, because there is an intent to cause death, which is the definition of murder, and the act is most often planned and deliberate, which is the definition of first-degree murder
  • elieve suffering
  • Charges in Canada have ranged from administering a noxious substance, to manslaughter, to murder.
  •   Other Cases in Canada
  • eating disorders
  • weighed only 22 pounds,
  • was severely disabled and could not speak, being virtually non-communicative to all except her closest caregivers. 
  • Kayla Korman on 23 Nov 10
     
    This website talks about very important topics that we can bring up in our debate, such as the historical background of euthanasia, the Criminal Code concerning this topic and some cases and examples we've had in canada.
  • Daryl Bambic on 24 Nov 10
     
    You MUST highlight specific parts to bring your team's attention to an issue. Just bookmarking is not enough.
Kelsey Adams

The Animal Rights View - 2 views

www.furcommission.com/...rights.htm

shared by Kelsey Adams on 23 Nov 10 - No Cached
  • The capacity for suffering is a prerequisite for having interests at all, a condition that must be met before we can speak of rights.
  • In both the historic and modern views of animal rights, the key point is "sentience," or the capacity to experience pain or pleasur
  • In the animal rights view, if a being is capable of suffering, there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • They don't have to speak a word. Screaming, writhing about, crying and other behavior tells us they are in pain. We see the same sort of behavior in animals.
  • Kelsey Adams on 23 Nov 10
     
    This website gives us the utilitarian point of view on how animal cruelty and their use as resource is continuously horrid. Jeremy Bentham said that as long as a being is capable of suffering, then there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration. He said that the question is not can animals reason but do animals suffer?
  • Daryl Bambic on 24 Nov 10
     
    Highlight an important part(s) of the website for your team to read.
  • vince chatigny-barbosa on 05 Dec 10
     
    What affects us the most in our society: Suffering of a infant or the suffering of an animal? Obviously, we would rather an animal suffer opposed to an infant. If someone has to suffer, it should be animals because it the extreme is outrageous.
Lauren Ganze

The Taxpayer's Bill of Rights - 0 views

www.cra-arc.gc.ca/...README.html

Taxpayer's taxes taxation tax bill of rights

shared by Lauren Ganze on 06 Dec 10 - No Cached
  • Lauren Ganze on 06 Dec 10
     
    This site has a link to a PDF file that is the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights. I thought that this would help in the debate to prove that taxation isn't theft because in this scenario, the supposed thief (governement) is giving rights to the people it is "stealing" from. This proves that the government isn't stealing our money: it is taking a percentage of our incomes so that it may better maintain the society we treasure and thrive in. The PDF contains the 15 rights that a taxpayer enjoys.
vince chatigny-barbosa

Animals lack free moral judgment - 1 views

debatepedia.idebate.org/...e_they_have_no_moral_judgement

shared by vince chatigny-barbosa on 05 Dec 10 - No Cached
  • vince chatigny-barbosa on 05 Dec 10
     
    This is a website basically supporting the argument that animals lack the free moral judgment and basically cannot exercise any rights.
  • Lauren Ganze on 06 Dec 10
     
    "However closely humans and lower animals resemble each other, human beings alone possess the capacity for free choice and the responsibility to act ethically." This is a quote from the site you bookmarked that I find is part of a good point and a good argument. You really chose a good site because it holds philosophical points instead of only opinions and facts. It doesn't really leave much room for argument, but you might want to watch out for your opponents saying things like, "Who's to say they don't have ratinoal thought?" It's sure to help you out in your debate, though.
mira ahmad

CBC News - Canada - The fight for the right to die - 1 views

www.cbc.ca/...f-assisted-suicide.html

shared by mira ahmad on 20 Nov 10 - Cached
  • If I cannot give consent to my own death, whose body is this? Who owns my life?
    • mira ahmad
      mira ahmad on 20 Nov 10
       
      This quote said by Ms. Rodriguez states that she is in charge of her own body and should be allowed to make her own decisions. Why should the law overpower her personal decisions that affect her?
  • In Canada, as in most countries, assisted suicide is illegal. But there seems to be a growing movement toward changing the law in many parts of the world.
    • mira ahmad
      mira ahmad on 20 Nov 10
       
      The Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland are the only countries where euthanasia are permitted. In Canada, one who commits assisted suicide can get up to 14 years in prison.
  • individuals should be able to control the time and circumstances of their own death
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • The Criminal Code of Canada outlaws suicide assistance, with penalties of up to 14 years in prison
  • mira ahmad on 20 Nov 10
     
    Sue Rodriguez was diagnosed with Lou Gehrig's disease, a fatal and painful disease. She fought to the Supreme Court of Canada to obtain the right to commit assisted suicide, but lost twice. She ended up committing assisted suicide with the help of an anonymous physician.
  • Catherine Delisle on 24 Nov 10
     
    This website is very credible. It also contains a lot of information. What I really like about it is the fact that it not only gives you an example to prove your point, but it also contains a lot of points to build a case for euthanasia. This website pointed some of the most interesting points for your case, which will help me refute during our debate.
  • sara tsapekis on 24 Nov 10
     
    I really like this website, because it gave a couple personal situations involving euthanasia, which allowed me to understand why someone might want euthanasia to be legal. The site also contains a lot of information including what the law in Canada and the U.S. was for euthanasia, and clearly explained why it is an issue. There are aspects in the text that favor euthanasia and others that explain why it should not be legal.
Ali Goldman

Taxation is Theft - 0 views

www.freerepublic.com/...posts

shared by Ali Goldman on 08 Dec 10 - No Cached
  • Ali Goldman on 08 Dec 10
     
    The website is an essay that someone has written. It shows the different points about why taxation is theft and how it is not always good.
  • dunya darwiche on 08 Dec 10
     
    Even as an essay this is great for the debate it gives us so many refutations for strong points given by the other team
1 - 13 of 13
Showing 20▼ items per page