Skip to main content

Home/ PDS GI Debate Group A '11-'12/ Group items tagged cons

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Austin Buben

Drug Facts | Marijuana - 1 views

  •  
    Some cons of marijuana. Unsupported.
Austin Buben

Cons of Marijuana Legalization (Potential Incriminating Article) - 1 views

  •  
    Could come back to hurt us.
Shana Thomas

The Effects of Marijuana Decriminalization - 0 views

  • Despite fears that use would increase because of decriminalization, there is little evidence to show that this happened in any of the 11 states that have decriminalized small quantities of marijuana. Also, reductions in the costs of enforcement and courts have meant that these funds can be spent elsewhere.
  •  
    marijuana can be good for the US; there are cons- but more pros
  •  
    found this article!
Austin Buben

BalancedPolitics.org - Legalization of Marijuana (Pros & Cons, Arguments For and Agains... - 1 views

    • Austin Buben
       
      Austin Buben found this document first.
    • Austin Buben
       
      Everything that I highlight is something that is a weak topic.
  • Some c
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • are likely
  • could
  • could
  • could
  • harmfulness of marijuana are inconclusive and contradictory
  • Most doctors would agree that it's not very harmful if used in moderation
  • isn't abuse of almost any bad substance a problem
  • Most doctors believe that marijuana is no more addictive that alcohol or tobacco.
  • All illegal drugs are higher in price because the production, transportation, and sale of the drugs carry heavy risks.
  • chemotherapy
  • if someone in the drug trade screws you over, there's no police to call or lawyers to litigate. You must settle disputes yourself.
  • enormous amount of money is raised through government taxation of alcohol, cigarettes, and other "sins".
  •  
    This is a basic website that should help lead everyone in a general direction of what they should get started on and further research these subjects.
Austin Buben

FT.com / Comment / Opinion - Why I had to recognise Georgia's breakaway regions - 0 views

  • Meanwhile, ignoring Russia’s warnings, western countries rushed to recognise Kosovo’s illegal declaration of independence from Serbia. We argued consistently that it would be impossible, after that, to tell the Abkhazians and Ossetians (and dozens of other groups around the world) that what was good for the Kosovo Albanians was not good for them. In international relations, you cannot have one rule for some and another rule for others.
    • Austin Buben
       
      Basically sums up my Tagline saying that Kosovo's declaration of independence from Serbia and the International Court of Justice's decision to recognize it as an independent state has heightened the debate over whether Abkhazia and South Ossetia should be considered independent states from Georgia.
Austin Buben

"Traditional Gap" In The ICJ's Advisory Opinion On Kosovo - 0 views

  • Of course, one can argue that the territorial integrity of Georgia, Azerbaijan and Moldova has already been recognized by many international organizations and by the majority of states in the world. The UN Security Council, notably, adopted many resolutions affirming the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Georgia and Azerbaijan.47 That is why one could conclude that this standpoint reflects already the position of the international community, according to which the secession of Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh has not been recognized (apart from Russia, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Nauru in Abkhazia’s and S. Ossetia’s case).
    • Austin Buben
       
      Shows the difference between Abkhazia being allowed their own independence and the international community recognizing Abkhazia and South Ossetia as Sovereign States; Which will never happen. (IF it would have, it already would have been expressed.)
  • The Court did not state in the Opinion that Kosovo through its declaration of independence effectively seceded from Serbia and thus the new state of “Kosovo” emerged. As it did not call into question the validity of UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999), which legitimizes the presence of international territorial administration in Kosovo, one can conclude that this resolution is still in force until a new resolution is adopted by the Council. In fact, according to this resolution, Kosovo shall only be given substantial autonomy within the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia). Hence it can be stated that, from a legal point of view, Kosovo still can be seen as part of Serbia.
1 - 8 of 8
Showing 20 items per page