Skip to main content

Home/ Organizational Design/ Group items tagged collaboration

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Vahid Masrour

Corner Office - Structure? The Flatter the Better, says Cristóbal Conde - Que... - 0 views

  • I think top-down organizations got started because the bosses either knew more or they had access to more information. None of that applies now. Everybody has access to identical amounts of information.
  • Now a global company means a company composed of teams that are themselves dispersed. So every team can be global in many senses, not just the company.
  • a C.E.O. needs to focus more on the platform that enables collaboration
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • By having technologies that allow people to see what others are doing, share information, collaborate, brag about their successes — that is what flattens the organization.
  • I think the role of the boss is to then work on those collaboration platforms
  • It’s more like the producer of the show, rather than being the lead.
  • But I can write five lines on Yammer, which is about all it takes.
  •  
    very interesting article on how a collaborative organization could be designed and put to work.
Vahid Masrour

Clay Shirky on institutions vs. collaboration | Video on TED.com - 0 views

  •  
    replace planning with coordination replace management with collaborative/cooperative infrastructure para&&& distribution: a few contribute a lot, most contribute very little (80-20 rule) There are other ways to organize than just institutions. mass amateurization killed professional publishing
Vahid Masrour

The End of Management - WSJ.com - 2 views

  • They were an answer to the challenge of organizing thousands of people in different places and with different skills to perform large and complex tasks, like building automobiles or providing nationwide telephone service
    • Vahid Masrour
       
      Creating a formal organization was key at the time. Creating the formal organization is easier now, thanks to better means for coordinating action: you still need a network of committed people, but not the formality.
  • They were designed and tasked, not with reinforcing market forces, but with supplanting and even resisting the market
  • Clayton Christensen's "The Innovator's Dilemma
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • They listened closely to their customers. They carefully studied market trends. They allocated capital to the innovations that promised the largest returns. And in the process, they missed disruptive innovations that opened up new customers and markets for lower-margin, blockbuster products.
  • the ability of human beings on different continents and with vastly different skills and interests to work together and coordinate complex tasks has taken quantum leaps.
  • We have both a need and an opportunity to devise a new form of economic organization, and a new science of management, that can deal with the breakneck realities of 21st century change.
  • the even bigger challenge of creating structures that motivate and inspire workers
  • It will have to push power and decision-making down the organization as much as possible, rather than leave it concentrated at the top
  • Traditional bureaucratic structures will have to be replaced with something more like ad-hoc teams of peers, who come together to tackle individual projects, and then disband
Vahid Masrour

Corner Office - Structure? The Flatter the Better, says Cristóbal Conde - Que... - 0 views

  • You have to do that consistently for over a year before you start having an impact.
  • Instead, the trick is to get truly world-class people working directly for you so you don’t have to spend a lot of time managing them.
  • So I try to spend time with people two and three levels below because I think I can add value to them.
Vahid Masrour

Corner Office - Structure? The Flatter the Better, says Cristóbal Conde - Que... - 0 views

  • I think the more an organization is diverse that way, the healthier it is, and better decisions will come out.
Vahid Masrour

A management strategy that works for young employees - Dec. 16, 2009 - 0 views

  • Together, they set the company's goals for the next 100 days. And they go around the table to hear how each staffer -- execs included -- did on his personal deliverables over the last 100 days. They ask each other questions, weigh in with their own perspectives on their colleagues' work
  • staffers work directly with their managers to lay out their individual plans for the next 100 days and actually grade themselves on their last 100-day plan
  • it has the grand effect of making each person his or her own manager. Everyone's goals are completely clear, evaluations are a collaborative process, and perhaps most importantly, managers are just as accountable as their employees -- and they're accountable to their employees.
  •  
    Me like a LOT.
1 - 11 of 11
Showing 20 items per page