The seasoned editorial board of ExposeFacts will be assessing all the submitted material and, when deemed appropriate, will arrange for journalistic release of information. In exercising its judgment, the editorial board is able to call on the expertise of the ExposeFacts advisory board, which includes more than 40 journalists, whistleblowers, former U.S. government officials and others with wide-ranging expertise. We are proud that Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg was the first person to become a member of the ExposeFacts advisory board.
The icon below links to a SecureDrop implementation for ExposeFacts overseen by the Freedom of the Press Foundation and is only accessible using the Tor browser. As the Freedom of the Press Foundation notes, no one can guarantee 100 percent security, but this provides a “significantly more secure environment for sources to get information than exists through normal digital channels, but there are always risks.” ExposeFacts follows all guidelines as recommended by Freedom of the Press Foundation, and whistleblowers should too; the SecureDrop onion URL should only be accessed with the Tor browser — and, for added security, be running the Tails operating system. Whistleblowers should not log-in to SecureDrop from a home or office Internet connection, but rather from public wifi, preferably one you do not frequent. Whistleblowers should keep to a minimum interacting with whistleblowing-related websites unless they are using such secure software.
Comment posted 1 week ago in reply to Zzgomes ..... by Ed Carp. Finally someone who gets it! OBTW, i replaced Windows 7 with Linux Mint over a year ago and hope to never return. The thing is though, i am not a member of a Windows productivity workgroup, nor do i need to connect to any Windows databases or servers. Essentially i am not using any Windows business process or systems. It's all Internet!!! 100% Web and Cloud Services systems. And that's why i can dump Windows without a blink! While working for Sursen Corp, it was a very different story. I had to have Windows XP and Windows 7, plus MSOffice 2003-2007, plus Internet Explorer with access to SharePoint, Skydrive/Live.com. It's all about the business processes and systems you're part of, or must join. And that's exactly why the Linux Desktop has failed. Give Cloud Computing the time needed to re-engineer and re-invent those many Windows business processes, and the Linux Desktop might suceed. The trick will be in advancing both the Linux Desktop and Application developer layers to target the same Cloud Computing services mobility targets. ..... Windows will take of itself. The real fight is in the great transition of business systems and processes moving from the Windows desktp/workgroup productivity model to the Cloud. Linux Communities must fight to win the great transition. And yes, in the end this all about a massive platform shift. The fourth wave of computing began with the Internet, and will finally close out the desktop client/server computing model as the Web evolves into the Cloud. excerpt: Most posters here have it completely wrong...the *real* reason Linux doesn't have a decent penetration into the desktop market is quite obvious if you look at the most successful desktop in history - Windows. All this nonsense about binary driver compatibility, distro fragmentation, CORBA, and all the other red herrings that people are talking about are completely irrelevant