Article(s): Self- and Peer-Assessment Online - 1 views
-
Self evaluation and team grade.
-
erichillman on 02 Jun 16I think this approach is what I will be using going forward. A well designed participation rubric will be essential.
-
-
-
My experience has been similar- and it is why I hated group work. I always ended up doing all the work so I got a decent grade and the others were just dragged along for the ride. I try very hard to avoid this in my teaching, but am working on implementing more of it using the best practices I learn here!
-
-
-
The purpose for assessment is so important. It is why I preach and practice backwards design, so I know where I'm headed when I am teaching. I think back to my larger college classes where I could snooze through lectures, download the powerpoints, and ace the multiple choice exams...would some form of peer assessment/group accountability been more effective?
-
- ...2 more annotations...
-
well written rubric not only helps the facilitator score the assignment but it and can greatly increase the quality and effort put into assignments by giving students a clear expectations with knowledge that must be demonstrated
-
I do not recommend including an option on the peer evaluation for team members to make comments about their peers. Should team members have negative comments to make about peers, this tool is not a constructive venue.
-
I often help my ex-wife with her group projects (she's a full time adjunct). She uses this method and provides spaces for people to make comments. My experience is that the only time people make comments is when they have something negative to say. This often turns into "flaming" versus constructive criticism.
-