Skip to main content

Home/ OLLIE Iowa/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by arieux1

Contents contributed and discussions participated by arieux1

arieux1

Adaptive Learning System Articles - 0 views

  • all adaptive software tries to mimic some aspect of what a good teacher does, given that every student has individual needs.
    • arieux1
       
      Important for me to remember as I start working on the lab. Hopefully, computers will never replace teachers... but I've seen too many movies.
  • They are not expected to know everything that the instructor knows, but they are good at helping to ensure that the students get the basics right
    • arieux1
       
      In my mind, this is what I'd use OLPs for. I've studied them as part of my blended learning training. To me, they are a way to augment what is being done in the classroom in a personalized way. This statement is pretty much how I'd put it.
  • Students get real-time response to their work
    • arieux1
       
      What I like about the idea of adaptive learning tech is this. Students can work on the low level, building block skills when and where they want, as quickly as is needed for them. The tech does this automatically, taking it off the teacher's plate. Knowing this kind of stuff will help the teacher drill down to what is needed.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Adaptive tech can help them get past those hurdles with a little extra help
    • arieux1
       
      In Iowa, we probably don't see as much dropout as other parts of the world. But students do fall behind and don't achieve to the level they should - not just for them, but for the future they will encounter. Providing them with tools to overcome the gaps is something we should aspire to as teachers.
  • Educators, of course, have been doing this for centuries. What is new about this practice today, however, is simply the use of technology
    • arieux1
       
      So this is the thing. Teachers need to move students into the higher levels of thinking and learning to meet the needs of the future. Letting a program ensure students learn these building blocks makes it easier for the teachers to scaffold them to the higher realms of thinking.
  • Adding the tech makes it possible to personalize at scale
    • arieux1
       
      Ah, now that's cool! I like that sentence because it encourages people to use the tech to personalize more easily and practically for all students.
  • "Do you want them to read something, watch something and then answer a multiple choice quiz, or do you want them to build a bridge with a simulator that gives them specific feedback and specific activity based on that?"
    • arieux1
       
      This is a good question regardless of what you teach, the level you teach at, and the approach you take. I just wanted to point that out.
arieux1

Implementation in a Secondary Classroom (Articles) - 1 views

  • It is a messier way to teach, though it takes more organization on the teacher’s part, not less.
    • arieux1
       
      Reality statement here. This is probably the biggest hurdle for teachers. It's a lot easier to lecture and control than it is for the students to lead the way and the teacher to augment that. I think it's worth it because the kids are more engaged and enthusiastic and the learning is much more long-term.
  • Not every program lends itself to choice, of course, but even then there are opportunities.
    • arieux1
       
      That's a good point, too. It doesn't have to be completely open-ended with total release to students. I think this idea (in the paragraph) is an especially good way to start working toward personalization.
  • adapt to whatever tools are available
    • arieux1
       
      I like this point because this is a road block for people. Technology is available to some extent in each school, so use what you got instead of worrying about what you don't have. Technology is a tool, not a replacement.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Let students make choices.
    • arieux1
       
      I like this section in total. It has some solid examples. I also liked the first line here about starting off by trying to control but realizing it made more sense to frontload and release.
  • The more meaningful an activity is to the person engaging in it, the more likely he or she will be motivated to continue doing it.
    • arieux1
       
      This is a good point but one that I feel is difficult to find all the time. With so much content to cover, I think this is a pick and choose battle for teachers. That's probably ok in the end - there's a lesson to learn doing things that aren't fun or engaging but important. I think preaching patience when starting personalization - it will take some time for the whole thing to come together.
  • When you want to give students choice, it is often optimal to give them a limited number of options, but be as flexible as possible
    • arieux1
       
      In my master's program, we called that "the illusion of choice." Here are (three carefully selected) options for completing this task, pick whichever you want. Students that have the ability to make their own decisions will usually provide that if you allow them to propose (and actually consider) something new.
  • Almost all teachers find it emotionally fulfilling and personally energizing when students begin to succeed, especially where they have previously failed.
    • arieux1
       
      That's good. A selling point. I'm guessing this is too vague to convince the real naysayers - I'd prefer a reference or a more specific stat than this. This is what makes this style worth it - kids getting into it is more fun than just talking at this for a while.
  • Teachers must identify the big ideas in their content area, establish essential questions to guide the students toward these ideas, determine what students will need to know and be able to do to thoroughly understand the ideas, then create appropriate tools to assess whether the students are learning what they need to know. Classroom assessments for personalized teaching are always varied, ongoing, and carefully designed to give the teacher useful information from multiple perspectives. Collectively, the measures provide feedback on where students still have misconceptions, where they are learning and applying skills, and where they are recalling and using information effectively.
    • arieux1
       
      This is just an all encompassing paragraph here. I think this should describe teaching regardless of your approach. That's all.
arieux1

PLE Articles - 2 views

  • The concept of PLE is not a way to replace classroom learning, but to enhance it.
    • arieux1
       
      I think this is important to point out at the beginning. At first, personalized learning (I believe) makes the teacher feel irrelevant. That's not true, but it seems like it.
  • PLEs place a large amount of responsibility on students and thus requires a high level of self-management and awareness
    • arieux1
       
      I think this is good to point out. These skills aren't often turned over to the kids, so they must be explicitly taught. I think self-reflection is probably the best way to instill this in students.
  • The idea of having one site to log into daily and then a pre-constructed  dashboard of all the learning tools and spaces available to us seemed appealing
    • arieux1
       
      That seems like a good way to let groups do research on their own but still with some facilitation. Throwing lots of resources on there, teaching them how to use them and skills required (as they come up), and then turn them loose.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • I only wish that students could edit the webmix in their own accounts (and if they can, I haven’t discovered how yet), but that is really a minor wrinkle for us at this point; I also wish I could publish the webmix with a public URL accessible to non-Symbaloo users.
    • arieux1
       
      These seem like the types of things I was going to have them do with this. Maybe not, but at the very least these are things to look into as I explore this resources.
  • A PLE is the method students use to organize their self-directed online learning, including the tools they employ to gather information, conduct research, and present their findings.    As the name implies, PLEs give learners a high degree of control over their work by allowing them to customize the learning experience and connect to others, including experts in the field.
    • arieux1
       
      That's a great definition, so I marked it. It sort of encompasses what it is and why it's important, in addition to providing some ideas.
  • our work must increasingly attend to supporting students in developing their skills and motivations for becoming themselves networked and sophisticated online learners
    • arieux1
       
      Nice! As an instructional coach, I've constantly been saying "the person talking is the person learning" (for two years!) in order to have the teachers understand that if they talk for the entire period (i.e. are the holder of all knowledge, content, and skills), all the students are getting is short term learning and dependence on the teacher. I feel like this is the same idea.
  • ou can provide a tile linking to a web page describing a number  of exploratory activities a student will need to engage in, but make the path for accomplishing these activities (e.g., the numbers and types of tiles used) up to the student.
    • arieux1
       
      Now that's a good idea!
arieux1

"Personalized" vs. "Personal" Learning - 0 views

  • A personalized environment gives students the freedom to follow a meaningful line of inquiry, while building the skills to connect, synthesize and analyze information into original productions
    • arieux1
       
      While I wanted to highlight this entire paragraph, I thought this was the one that stuck out the most. This was a really concise way to describe personalization and I just wanted to note how directly this section of the article addressed the entire issue of what this really is.
  • Technology was strikingly absent from these conversations
    • arieux1
       
      This was surprising to me. When I think of personalization, I tend to include technology in it. This idea makes total sense, though, because if a student doesn't view tech as necessary or it isn't part of it, it shouldn't be forced.
  • We don’t need personalization as much as we need to promote and give opportunities for our kids to do personal learning
    • arieux1
       
      I couldn't agree with this more. I think that a lot of personalization is actually allowing students to learn at their own pace, but in order through a prescribed curriculum. It may be more valuable to allow students to do some learning of what they want how they want.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • having my students read the literature at home and come into class ready to discuss it
    • arieux1
       
      Haha! As a former ELA teacher, several of my colleagues and I argued this exact point a few years ago. That's funny.
  • they’ll master a set of skills mandated by people who have never met them
  • skills are acquired sequentially
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page