The fact that interactivity (so essential to the process of learning) is claimed as a rare bonus reveals the dreary truth, that the vast majority of resources are expositive.
a new report written by the former presidents of two prominent traditional universities on behalf of the nonprofit Ithaka S+R.
However, these innovative colleges have shown less interest in using the novel medium to curb tuition charges and measure learning outcomes.
"Barriers to Adoption of Online Learning Systems in U.S. Higher Education," was co-written by Lawrence S. Bacow and William G. Bowen, the former presidents of Tufts and Princeton Universities, respectively, along with several Ithaka analysts. It was bankrolled by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
objective was to assess the potential roadblocks that might prevent these traditional institutions from adopting sophisticated, “machine guided” learning tools into their curriculums
The most frequently cited motivation for adopting online programs was “the desire to generate new revenue streams,” they write.
“Very few are using either savings from online education or the net incremental revenue to reduce the price of education to students,”
there is slippage in discussion between machine-guided learning and online learning--they are not the same thing
Neither has a belief in superior pedagogical opportunities played much of a role in the decision of traditional institutions to push their curriculums on to the Web.
potential obstacles to the widespread adoption of such systems -- most revolving around faculty skepticism
perennial fear that instructors could lose their jobs to interloping automatons.
intellectual property issues might be the thorniest obstacle
professors might not be keen to use automated tutorials that they cannot add to and remix based on their own styles and tastes.