Fitna is a 2008 short film made by a Dutch member of parliament to
support his fight against Islam. It shows shocking footage of terrorism,
violence and women’s oppression and claims that these are inherent to Islam. The
film caused immense controversy and mobilized people across the world to produce
and upload their own views to YouTube. In this article we analyze these videos
using different theoretical models of democratic interaction, and distinguishing
between antagonism, ‘agonism’ and dialogue. On the basis of a cybermetric
network analysis we find that the videos are mostly isolated reactions to the
film. Only 13 percent or fewer of the posters interacted with each other through
comments, subscriptions or ‘friendship’. These interactions could be qualified
as antagonistic or agonistic, but very rarely involved dialogue. We therefore
conclude that YouTube enabled a multiplication of views rather than an exchange
or dialogue between them.