Skip to main content

Home/ METU EDS 544/ Group items tagged critiques

Rss Feed Group items tagged

dozoran

Collection of all critiques to Multiple Intelligence Theory -in one page- - 3 views

  •  
    You will find all authors and their related work that criticizes MI theory. One notable and recent critique that Turkish academicians made: DECIPHERING THE THEORY OF MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES: AN ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE http://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol._2_No._11_[Special_Issue-June_2011]/32.pdf
  • ...2 more comments...
  •  
    After reading the article from Turkish authors I felt the need to look their affiliation. An it was not Faculty of "İlahiyat" but it was seriously Faculty of Education.
  •  
    Dincer, I had enough patience to glance through the article. I don't think these arguments have any scientific basis!!
  •  
    Agreed! But I posted this for us to see and be aware of some people in Turkish Education. Thanks for your time and comment.
  •  
    For the first time I see that a scientific theory is tried to be challenged by a divine source rather than a scientific source. In my opinion, scientific debates should rely on scientific data and reasoning. Since divine sources describe an eternal truth, such sources make scientific debates and progress meaningless. In that sense, I think that this article's applicability and validity is open to discussion. Thank you Dinçer, it was one of the most interesting articles that I have run across so far.
Evrim Baran

Not Every Child Is Secretly a Genius - The Chronicle Review - The Chronicle of Higher E... - 5 views

  •  
    Here is another critique on MI. Interesting insights are presented here. 
  •  
    The author contrasts the MI intelligence with single intelligence and says that single intelligence is not educable, rather it is an innate capacity. As an educator, this criticism for MI is useful for me only because I remember to be critical to the theory and begin to search for weakness of it. Otherwise the authors view of single intelligence (non-educable and innate) shows me, as an educator, no direction about my teaching. So I find the Gardner's view (though it may not be a theory) more compelling than the authors view even if I agree that there are problems with Gardner's word choices. Rather than "multiple intelligence theory" he could use "practices of multiple abilities".
Bilge Aslan

Davranışçı Yaklaşım Eleştirisi « Pygmalion Etkisi - 1 views

  •  
    This blog belongs to one of my frineds doing his M.A. degree on Curriculum and Instruction in Istanbul University. The critique totally belongs to him. 
Burcu Korkusuz

Comparison Table of Educational Warriors - 4 views

  •  
    This is our comparison table by Dinçer, Hatice, Sinem, Burcu, Defne :)
  • ...2 more comments...
  •  
    Thanks Educational Warriors for sharing the table. I see you don't have any critique on constructivism and humanism?
  •  
    Evrim Hocam, you said that weakness and criticique addresses the same things so we can omit one.Thats why I didn`t include criticique on the approaches.But if you think we should include that as well.I can re-write it hocam.
  •  
    Defne, It is better to address them in the table. Perhaps, you can add couple points there.
  •  
    Evrim Hocam, I addressed to the specific approaches in the table as you wished:)
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page