Skip to main content

Home/ Literacy of Cooperation/ Group items tagged control

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Lisa Tansey

James B. Glattfelder: Who controls the world? | Video on TED.com - 1 views

  •  
    Glattfelder follows the chain of transnational corporate ownership to determine "who controls the world" economically-speaking.  I.e., our economic commons. He defines the rather tight network of control as an emergent property rather than some global conspiracy.
Charlotte Pierce

Kevin Kelly -- Out of Control - 1 views

  •  
    In his book "Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World" Kevin Kelly has a chapter titled "Hive Mind."  Here is one of my favorite parts of that chapter: "For many years Mark Thompson, a beekeeper local to my area, had the bizarre urge to build a Live-In Hive -- an active bee home you could visit by inserting your head into it. He was working in a yard once when a beehive spewed a swarm of bees "like a flow of black lava, dissolving, then taking wing." The black cloud coalesced into a 20-foot-round black halo of 30,000 bees that hovered, UFO-like, six feet off the ground, exactly at eye level. The flickering insect halo began to drift slowly away, keeping a constant six feet above the earth. It was a Live-In Hive dream come true.
Lisa Tansey

Albert Einstein Institution - Publications - 005 From Dictatorship to Democracy - 0 views

  •  
    Gene Sharp founded the Albert Einstein Institute. His book From Dictatorship to Democracy has been used as a field manual in numerous liberation movements in Eastern Europe, in the Arab Spring and elsewhere. In his three volume The Politics of Nonviolent Action he examines the nature and control of political power and the methods and dynamics of nonviolent action. He identifies and document 198 specific methods of nonviolent action. Over half of these methods come under one or another heading of noncooperation. 
Lisa Tansey

Albert Einstein Institution - Advancing freedom through nonviolent action - 0 views

  •  
    Another recommendation from David Watkins re the Parable of the Tribes.  He says: Gene Sharp founded the Albert Einstein Institute. His book From Dictatorship to Democracy has been used as a field manual in numerous liberation movements in Eastern Europe, in the Arab Spring and elsewhere. In his three volume The Politics of Nonviolent Action he examines the nature and control of political power and the methods and dynamics of nonviolent action. He identifies and document 198 specific methods of nonviolent action. Over half of these methods come under one or another heading of noncooperation. In this NewStatesman article Sharp is described as the Machiavelli of non-violence.
Charlotte Pierce

Shame and honor drive cooperation « Jennifer Jacquet - 0 views

  •  
    Can the threat of being shamed or the prospect of being honoured lead to greater cooperation? We test this hypothesis with anonymous six-player public goods experiments, an experimental paradigm used to investigate problems related to overusing common resources. We instructed the players that the two individuals who were least generous after 10 rounds would be exposed to the group. As the natural antithesis, we also test the effects of honour by revealing the identities of the two players who were most generous. The non-monetary, reputational effects induced by shame and honour each led to approximately 50 per cent higher donations to the public good when compared with the control, demonstrating that both shame and honour can drive cooperation and can help alleviate the tragedy of the commons.
Charlotte Pierce

The Evolution of Cooperation* - 0 views

  • trategy of simple reciprocity which cooperates on the first move and then does whatever the other player did on the previous move
  • forgiveness
  • provocability
  • ...24 more annotations...
  • clarity of behavior
  • frontline soldiers often refrained from shooting to kill – provided their restraint was reciprocated by the soldiers on the other side.
  • reciprocate cooperation
  • mutual restraint possible was the static nature
  • individuals involved do not have to be rational
  • The use of reciprocity can be enough to make defection unproductive.
  • no central authority
  • For cooperation to prove stable, the future must have a sufficiently large shadow.
  • chance of meeting again
  • single individual who offers cooperation cannot prosper
  • Cooperation can begin with small clusters.
  • provocable
  • forgiving
  • overall level of cooperation tends to go up and not down
  • ratchet
  • participants know they will be dealing with each other again and again
  • Arms control could also evolve tacitly.
  • The foundation of cooperation is not really trust, but the durability of the relationship.
  • conditions are ripe for them to build a stable pattern of cooperation
  • value of provocability
  • respond sooner,
  • responding right away, it gives the quickest possible feedback
  • Once cooperation based upon reciprocity gets established in a population, it cannot be overcome even by a cluster of individuals who try to exploit the others.
  • mple reciprocity succeeds without doing better than anyone with whom it interacts. It succeeds by eliciting cooperation from others, not by defeating them
  •  
    Robert Axelrod Professor of Political Science and Public Policy, University of Michigan, AnnArbor. Dr. Axelrod is a member of the American National Academy of Sciencesand the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. His honors include a MacArthurFoundation Fellowship for the period 1987 through 1992. Under what conditions will cooperation emerge in a world of egoistswithout central authority? This question has intrigued people for a longtime. We all know that people are not angels, and that they tend to lookafter themselves and their own first. Yet we also know that cooperationdoes occur and that our civilization is based upon it
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page